Hi Mike,
On 01/12/14 15:28, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> Worse than unmaintained - this one was taken out of existence last
> Friday. I've already notified Paul Eggleton, so it should removed from
> the list soon.
Excellent, thanks for the update :-)
___
Ope
On 9-1-2014 19:45, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
suspected of being, unmaintai
Hi,
meta-erlang
>
maintained.
--
João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.com
Campinas-SP-Brasil
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Hi,
On Jan 9, 2014 8:45 PM, "Trevor Woerner" wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
> suspe
On 01/09/2014 10:45 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
suspected of being, unma
On 01/10/14 11:02, Philip Balister wrote:
> BTW, I maintain meta-sdr.
...and meta-ettus and meta-zynq?
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On 01/10/2014 10:51 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 01/10/14 09:01, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> This is all very interesting with people piping up that their layers
>> are maintained, but I'm not sure it helps solve the overall problem.
>
>> Also, if it does appear that a layer has gone "
Hi Paul,
On 01/10/14 09:01, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> This is all very interesting with people piping up that their layers
> are maintained, but I'm not sure it helps solve the overall problem.
> Also, if it does appear that a layer has gone "unmaintained" by
> popular consensus, what should actuall
Op 10 jan. 2014, om 15:01 heeft Paul Eggleton
het volgende geschreven:
> On Thursday 09 January 2014 13:45:23 Trevor Woerner wrote:
>> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
>> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
>> be possible
On Thursday 09 January 2014 13:45:23 Trevor Woerner wrote:
> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
> suspected of being,
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
> suspected of being, unmaintained?
>
>
>
> meta-hipos
>
> i
On 01/10/2014 02:45 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
suspected of being, unma
Hi Trevor,
On 01/09/2014 07:45 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
suspected of
On 9 January 2014 20:45, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
> suspected of
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Trevor Woerner
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:45 AM
> To: openembedded-core
> Subject: [OE-core] unmaintained la
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:45:38PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
>> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
>> > is the sorted l
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Trevor Woerner
wrote:
> On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
>>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Her
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
> suspec
On 10 January 2014 06:54, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Trevor Woerner
> wrote:
>> On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> At the la
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:45:38PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
> > wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
> > > is the s
On 01/09/2014 06:20 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
>>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
is
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:45:38PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
> > is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
> > b
On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
>> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
>>> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index
On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
be possible for those in the know to indica
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
> suspec
Hi everyone,
At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
suspected of being, unmaintained?
meta-aarch64
meta-acer
meta-ada
meta
26 matches
Mail list logo
