On 01/09/2014 06:20 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner >>> <trevor.woer...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here >>>> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it >>>> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are >>>> suspected of being, unmaintained? >>> >>> Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity >>> ? Versus an >>> opt-in query ? >> >> I agree.. see below for mine.. > > To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought > were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this > way works too. > > Interestingly enough, had I sorted the list on commit activity, > according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/?s=idle > meta-realtime hasn't been touched in 10 months which would make me > suspect it was abandoned.
This approach is a good test of which layer maintainers are paying attention to list traffic :) Philip > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
