On 10 January 2014 06:54, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Trevor Woerner > <trevor.woer...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner >>>> <trevor.woer...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here >>>>> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it >>>>> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are >>>>> suspected of being, unmaintained? >>>> >>>> Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity >>>> ? Versus an >>>> opt-in query ? >>> >>> I agree.. see below for mine.. >> >> To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought >> were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this >> way works too.
I maintain meta-games, though I have only very little time to give it - not much activity to add new games, just keeping existing things working. That's to say that I would consider passing main maintainership, and keeping working only on my own games myself, to someone more active if someone steps up. - ML _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
