On 9 May 2012 18:46, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> On 9 May 2012 17:49, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>
>> Who can definitively state what the legal RPROVIDE format is in OE?
>
> If we are to define it now, and selecting from existing alternatives,
> parenthesis could denote either:
>
> deb style) Single versio
On 5/9/12 10:47 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
The per-file "advanced" dependencies, which are not yet being used by ipkg
or deb, include a marker for rtld support. The libc on the system needs to
have a provide that it supports GNU_HASH, otherwise a miss
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> The per-file "advanced" dependencies, which are not yet being used by ipkg
> or deb, include a marker for rtld support. The libc on the system needs to
> have a provide that it supports GNU_HASH, otherwise a missing dependency
> occurs and the s
On 9 May 2012 17:49, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 5/8/12 9:09 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9 May 2012 04:36, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Marko Lindqvist
wrote:
>
>
>
> You should know th
On 5/8/12 9:09 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
On 9 May 2012 04:36, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
You should know that I'm just figuring out what to do with
"rtld(GNU_HASH)" that already exist for eglibc
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> On 9 May 2012 04:36, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> You should know that I'm just figuring out what to do with
>>> "rtld(GNU_HASH)" that already exist for eglibc. When building
>>> de
On 9 May 2012 04:36, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
>>
>>
>> You should know that I'm just figuring out what to do with
>> "rtld(GNU_HASH)" that already exist for eglibc. When building
>> deb-packets based image, that results in:
>> "reference to 'rtld':
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
>
>
> You should know that I'm just figuring out what to do with
> "rtld(GNU_HASH)" that already exist for eglibc. When building
> deb-packets based image, that results in:
> "reference to 'rtld': error in version: version number does not sta
On 9 May 2012 03:43, Khem Raj wrote:
> -RPROVIDES_uclibc += "libsegfault"
> +
> +RPROVIDES_uclibc += "libsegfault rtld(GNU_HASH)"
You should know that I'm just figuring out what to do with
"rtld(GNU_HASH)" that already exist for eglibc. When building
deb-packets based image, that results in:
"re
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc
b/meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc
index f5b6bf7..55ab0c9 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc
+++ b/meta/
10 matches
Mail list logo