On 9 May 2012 04:36, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Marko Lindqvist <cazf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> You should know that I'm just figuring out what to do with >> "rtld(GNU_HASH)" that already exist for eglibc. When building >> deb-packets based image, that results in: >> "reference to 'rtld': error in version: version number does not start >> with digit" >> >> I've confirmed that error message is caused by this by simply >> removing "(GNU_HASH)" -> eglibc build success > > yeah this is rpm brain damage actually that we are dealing with here. > I think rpm should be fixed for this. I am not entirely sure why this > would be needed on current OE-Core lets say if its needed it should then > be made specific when someone is using rpm for packaging.
I've not yet figured out what all this tries to achieve, but are you saying that it might be acceptable solution for eglibc too to simply remove "(GNU_HASH)" if nobody from rpm world vetoes such patch? - ML _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
