On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Marko Lindqvist <cazf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9 May 2012 04:36, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Marko Lindqvist <cazf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> You should know that I'm just figuring out what to do with >>> "rtld(GNU_HASH)" that already exist for eglibc. When building >>> deb-packets based image, that results in: >>> "reference to 'rtld': error in version: version number does not start >>> with digit" >>> >>> I've confirmed that error message is caused by this by simply >>> removing "(GNU_HASH)" -> eglibc build success >> >> yeah this is rpm brain damage actually that we are dealing with here. >> I think rpm should be fixed for this. I am not entirely sure why this >> would be needed on current OE-Core lets say if its needed it should then >> be made specific when someone is using rpm for packaging. > > I've not yet figured out what all this tries to achieve, but are you > saying that it might be acceptable solution for eglibc too to simply > remove "(GNU_HASH)" if nobody from rpm world vetoes such patch?
yes. We need to find why this PROVIDE is needed at all in current OE _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
