Thank you for spotting this ! :)
Alex
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Cristian Iorga
wrote:
> oe-selftest --list-classes crashes because
> of a bad indent (see below). Fixed.
>
> systemd-build$ oe-selftest --list-classes
> 2015-04-22 12:12:39,141 - selftest - INFO - Listing all available tes
Despite the header, this is the single patch in this submission.
Thank you,
Alex
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Alex DAMIAN
wrote:
> From: Alexandru DAMIAN
>
> Toaster will log all the files that it can find in the
> deploy images directory, and list them, considering that
> they may be arti
Sorry for the mix-up, you're right.
I'll re-post to correct mail list.
Alex
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Koen Kooi
wrote:
>
> > Op 28 okt. 2014, om 15:09 heeft Alex DAMIAN
> het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > From: Alexandru DAMIAN
> >
> > In managed mode, Toaster tries to discover layers
This is just one patch, sorry about the confusing headline. It should read
[PATCH 01/01].
Alex
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Alex DAMIAN
wrote:
> From: Alexandru DAMIAN
>
> In managed mode, Toaster tries to discover layers
> that are being checked-out on disk.
>
> In base layers, the toaste
There are no other patches in this series, it's the only patch.
I'm sorry about the misleading Subject line.
Cheers,
Alex
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Alex DAMIAN
wrote:
> From: Alexandru DAMIAN
>
> This patch fixes an issue where the toaster postfuncs were
> added to the task signature,
Yep, there is a counterpart change submitted to bitbake.
Alex
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 15:28 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> > On 03/17/2014 08:04 AM, Alex DAMIAN wrote:
> > > From: Marius Avram
> > >
> > >
Yep, tasks that were looked up, and actual filenames attempted.
Alex
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:41 +0000, Damian, Alexandru wrote:
> > I would think against it, because
>
> > -
I would think against it, because
- it's very inefficient to send a Skipped event for each missed task than
to collect all the data and send it in one shot
- it's faster to send the event from the sstate.bbclass than to return the
task ids and then call again a python function to generate the ssta
Just a heads-up, this is a stand-alone patch, not a series, despite the
subject line :(
Alex
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Alex DAMIAN wrote:
> From: Alexandru DAMIAN
>
> Toaster needs buildstats to be enabled in order to
> collect task statistics. The toaster.bbclass didn't
> have a guard
weston.spec clearly describes the dependency.
And I found it while trying to compile. It's needed.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Alex DAMIAN wrote:
> > From: Alexandru DAMIAN
> >
> > Weston 1.1.0 has a build time dependency on
Please see comments below,
Cheers,
Alex
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Iorga, Cristian
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> See my comments below.
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
>
> From: Damian, Alexandru [mailto:alexandru.dam...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:31 PM
embedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Alex DAMIAN
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 5:47 PM
> To: richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org; tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com;
> Burton, Ross; paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com;
> openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Damian, Alexa
I guess it's up to the patch maintainer to decide :).
Alex
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 05:56 AM, Alex DAMIAN wrote:
>
>> From: Alexandru DAMIAN
>>
>> bluez4 uses readline to be build, but the dependency is not listed
>> This is listed in the configuration l
I'm gonna take out the attr dependency altogether on advice from Saul and
Richard
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:56 AM, Alex DAMIAN
> wrote:
>
> > From: Alexandru DAMIAN
> >
> > We have a build dependency, so list it out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex
One should follow the wayland website for HOWTO-s and testing
instructions.
Opening a terminal emulator and starting "weston" is the easiest way
to get started, regardless if one is under X or in console.
I don't think the patch comment is the proper place to document this,
should I add a wiki pa
Incoming reordered patches.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 21 December 2012 12:38, Damian, Alexandru
> wrote:
> > Actually, I'm thinking like this:
> >
> > - wayland, weston - initial commits
> > - mesa-dri - only patches.
>
Actually, I'm thinking like this:
- wayland, weston - initial commits
- mesa-dri - only patches.
It makes sense in my mind to add first the commits and then enable the
recipe change,
especially when it's not gonna work by default anyway (since mesa-git isn't
enabled).
Alex
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 20 December 2012 16:48, Alex DAMIAN wrote:
> > +PROVIDES += "wayland-egl libgbm libglapi"
>
> Remove this.
Mesa-dri provides these packages, why shouldn't we let the system know ?
> > # this needs to be lower than -1 because all mesa
Ok, I'll add the print. And re-submit.
Alex
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/2012 11:21 AM, Damian, Alexandru wrote:
> > IMHO, if the system has to fatal() here, something VERY wrong is going
> on.
> >
> > This isn't y
IMHO, if the system has to fatal() here, something VERY wrong is going on.
This isn't your general debug option, this is a last-resort emergency
rescue. I suppose that if you need to debug this, the system is so
problematic you need to deep-dive into it anyway.
I suggest taking it as it is now, a
I'm working on it now. Expect the patches shortly.
Alex
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 7 November 2012 00:01, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Please split the patch in two: one fixing udevd and another with new
> > features; please tag it properly as v3 so it is easy to
h and disregard the first one.
Alex
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Damian, Alexandru <
alexandru.dam...@intel.com> wrote:
> Just a heads-up, actually I've submitted the wrong file in the first place
> :(
>
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Damian,
Just a heads-up, actually I've submitted the wrong file in the first place
:(
Alex
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Damian, Alexandru <
alexandru.dam...@intel.com> wrote:
> I submitted a new patch in a separate mail, with proper description.
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
I submitted a new patch in a separate mail, with proper description.
Alex
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 16:32 +0200, Alex DAMIAN wrote:
> > From: Ross Burton
> >
> > udevd moved location and isn't in $PATH an
Hi all,
I sent patch v4 with a small change modifying the udev's default runtime
directory
from /run/ to the more traditional /var/run/.
I've opened two bugs https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3179and
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3181 to track the issue
and
to
This patch still stands.
I took a look at meta-oe. IMHO, the way the build works here is the right
way.
I had no problems rebasing it to the latest HEAD,
df5f9a3e6dfcf8e8f57132843a024b44c0bd90fc,
and rebuilding.
Tested as follows:
- build core-image-sato
- running qemux86 image
- udevd is starte
Hi,
I recommend changing the liburcu licence as follows, following a GPLv3
file addition in the build macros:
LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+ & MIT-style & GPLv3"
LICENSE_${PN} = "LGPLv2.1+ & MIT-style"
Cheers,
Alex
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
> From: Fahad Usman
>
> update lttng-module
Done https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2752
Alex
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Paul Eggleton <
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 12 July 2012 11:56:16 Damian, Alexandru wrote:
> > Solved by do_clean on the packages.
> >
> > S
Solved by do_clean on the packages.
Still Alex doesn't know what triggers the error.
-
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Damian, Alexandru <
alexandru.dam...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I started to see this error today, anybody seen this before ?
>
> Cheers,
>
Hi guys,
I started to see this error today, anybody seen this before ?
Cheers,
Alex
NOTE: Creating RPM package for python-man
| DEBUG: Python function write_specfile finished
| DEBUG: SITE files ['endian-little', 'bit-32', 'ix86-common',
'common-linux', 'common-glibc', 'i586-linux', 'common']
|
e top level
autom4te: m4 failed with exit status: 1
I'm gonna downgrade to autoconf 2.64 and see what happens.
Alex
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 06:06:55PM +0300, Damian, Alexandru wrote:
> > I guess the problem is no lmld, (skips ove
ed, 2012-07-04 at 17:50 +0300, Damian, Alexandru wrote:
> > The question wasn't why it fails, but why sometimes it goes through,
> > why sometimes fail, and why is it retriggered
> > without any changes to the config or files (run 5 times the
> > core-image-sato-sdk
* confdefs.h */
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 17:32 +0300, Mihai Lindner wrote:
> > On 7/4/2012 3:55 PM, Damian, Alexandru wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > From time to tim
MIhai gratiously provided the insight, the debug lines should be
FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${base_libdir}/udev/udev/.debug/"
FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${base_libdir}/udev/udev/.debug/*"
(notice base_libdir instead of libexecdir)
Cheers,
Alex
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:19 P
Hi guys,
>From time to time I get errors building gcc (although I didn't trigger a
rebuild!) when runnign
bitbake core-image-sato-sdk
The error is attached:
/home/ddalex/ssd/yocto/build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/gcc-4.7.1+svnr188658-r2/temp/log.do_configure.20668
What is causing this, is this a k
Hi Saul,
Some packages don't need upgrade, even if they are in the list, because the
detection was wrong.
How do we handle those ?
I'm talking here about:
- u-boot-mkimage, the 2012.04.1 version is already in the tree
- js, the 1.6 (target) is older than current version
- mobile-broadband-provide
Hi guys,
I'm trying to run a udev package upgrade (See attached patch).
I get this error,
ERROR: QA Issue: non debug package contains .debug directory: udev path
/work/i586-poky-linux/udev-182-r0/packages-split/udev/lib/udev/udev/.debug/v4l_id
ERROR: QA Issue: non debug package contains .debug d
37 matches
Mail list logo
