Yep, tasks that were looked up, and actual filenames attempted. Alex
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 15:41 +0000, Damian, Alexandru wrote: > > I would think against it, because > > > - it's very inefficient to send a Skipped event for each missed task > > than to collect all the data and send it in one shot > > - it's faster to send the event from the sstate.bbclass than to return > > the task ids and then call again a python function to generate the > > sstate file names - basically replicating the sstate.bbclass code in > > bitbake > > - the queueTaskSkipped event has a different semantic than what we > > need here to return a whole batch of data; creating a new event type > > from scratch is a bit pointless since the inheritance would need to be > > broken > > - knotty can receive MetadataEvents just as well as sceneTaskSkipped > > event, or any variation of it > > I guess I'd like to understand which information from this even you're > particularly interested in? > > Do I understand correctly that you want the actual filenames attempted? > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > -- Alex Damian Yocto Project SSG / OTC
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
