Re: [OE-core] Package re-order fallouts?

2012-08-28 Thread Samuel Stirtzel
2012/8/29 Khem Raj : > > On Aug 28, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Samuel Stirtzel > wrote: > >> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the >> package order has been changed. >> This causes failures with non symlink .so files in -dev packages for >> various meta-kde recipes. >> >> What

Re: [OE-core] Package re-order fallouts?

2012-08-28 Thread Khem Raj
On Aug 28, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the > package order has been changed. > This causes failures with non symlink .so files in -dev packages for > various meta-kde recipes. > > What is the preferred way to fix this?

Re: [OE-core] Package re-order fallouts?

2012-08-28 Thread Khem Raj
On Aug 28, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > > The package re-ordering happened in OE-Core and _not in Angstrom_ how > is this Angstrom related? > I misunderstood I think you are referring to commit b41b2bc584756956a48c9c5f91e7337e821105b2 Author: Saul Wold Date: Thu Jun 28 13:

Re: [OE-core] Package re-order fallouts?

2012-08-28 Thread Samuel Stirtzel
2012/8/29 Samuel Stirtzel : > 2012/8/28 Khem Raj : >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Samuel Stirtzel >> wrote: >>> 2012/8/28 Paul Eggleton : On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the > package order h

Re: [OE-core] Package re-order fallouts?

2012-08-28 Thread Samuel Stirtzel
2012/8/28 Khem Raj : > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Samuel Stirtzel > wrote: >> 2012/8/28 Paul Eggleton : >>> On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the package order has been changed. >>> >>> You say "ne

Re: [OE-core] sstate doc?

2012-08-28 Thread Stewart, David C
Rich - check the Yocto Project Reference Manual, available in the documentation tab on the Yoctoproject.org website. Looks like section 3.2.3 documents it. Dave Sent from my Blackberry - Original Message - From: Rich Pixley [mailto:rich.pix...@palm.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 0

[OE-core] sstate doc?

2012-08-28 Thread Rich Pixley
Where can I find documentation on the shared state system? --rich ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] task-core-basic: drop portmap

2012-08-28 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> libpcre \ >> -portmap \ >> rpcbind \ >> sysfsutils \ >> tcp-wrappers \ > > I came across this while digging back through the history in master. Does this > mean we ought to be switching to rpcbind in our other tasks w

Re: [OE-core] Package re-order fallouts?

2012-08-28 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > 2012/8/28 Paul Eggleton : >> On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: >>> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the >>> package order has been changed. >> >> You say "next", do you mean denzil-next or

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] base-files: provide a mechanism to skip creation of the hostname file

2012-08-28 Thread Burton, Ross
On 28 August 2012 21:01, Mark Asselstine wrote: >> But surely this should be running very early in the boot, and a >> DHCP-assigned name should be running afterwards? > > That hasn't been what I have observed, and doesn't cover the command line > case. If you have an NFS root this would also not b

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] base-files: provide a mechanism to skip creation of the hostname file

2012-08-28 Thread Mark Asselstine
On August 28, 2012 20:16:30 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 28 August 2012 19:53, Mark Asselstine wrote: > > hostname.sh doesn't leave much room for priority > > > > ---snip--- > > if test -f /etc/hostname > > then > > > > hostname -F /etc/hostname > > > > fi > > ---snip--- > > > > looking a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] base-files: provide a mechanism to skip creation of the hostname file

2012-08-28 Thread Burton, Ross
On 28 August 2012 19:53, Mark Asselstine wrote: > hostname.sh doesn't leave much room for priority > > ---snip--- > if test -f /etc/hostname > then > hostname -F /etc/hostname > fi > ---snip--- > > looking at this you can see my logic, don't create the /etc/hostname file get > rid of the o

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] nativesdk: Switch to using nativesdk as a prefix, not a suffix

2012-08-28 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > As discussed on the mailing lists, using a suffix to package names is > hard and has lead to many recipes having to do PKGSUFFIX games. Its > looking extremely hard to scale nativesdk much further without hacking > many recipes. > > By compa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] base-files: provide a mechanism to skip creation of the hostname file

2012-08-28 Thread Mark Asselstine
On August 28, 2012 19:38:04 Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 14:20 -0400, Mark Asselstine wrote: > > + if [ "${hostname}" != "none" ]; then > > This magic string value seems a bit unwholesome. Can't you just check > against the empty string? The 'none' was suggested by a colleague

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] base-files: provide a mechanism to skip creation of the hostname file

2012-08-28 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 14:20 -0400, Mark Asselstine wrote: > + if [ "${hostname}" != "none" ]; then This magic string value seems a bit unwholesome. Can't you just check against the empty string? Also, if the problem is that the static hostname set here is overriding the one from dhcp or the

[OE-core] [PATCH V2] base-files: provide a mechanism to skip creation of the hostname file

2012-08-28 Thread Mark Asselstine
The existence of a /etc/hostname file causes any hostname provided on the kernel command line or via dhcp to be overwritten by the initscripts 'init.d/hostname.sh'. This change allows you to set a value of 'none' for 'hostname' which will skip the creation of the /etc/hostname file by the base-file

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] task-self-hosted: remove e2fsprogs-fsck from task list

2012-08-28 Thread Saul Wold
Matches changes made to the e2fsprogs PACKAGE list Added PR Bump Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-self-hosted.bb |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-self-hosted.bb b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-self-h

[OE-core] [PATCH] task-self-hosted: remove e2fsprogs-fsck from task list

2012-08-28 Thread Saul Wold
Matches changes made to the e2fsprogs PACKAGE list Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-self-hosted.bb |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-self-hosted.bb b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-self-hosted.bb index 61

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] task-core-basic: drop portmap

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 28 August 2012 17:22:02 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 2 jun. 2012, om 04:24 heeft Christopher Larson het volgende geschreven: > > Both rpcbind and portmap are RPC port mappers. Having both is redundant. > > Chose rpcbind over portmap as rpcbind supports ipv6, nfs4, and builds > > without the g

[OE-core] [PATCH] nativesdk: Convert to use classextend.py

2012-08-28 Thread Richard Purdie
This patch converts the nativesdk class itself from operating as a suffix to a prefix (see the proceeding patch for the related changes outside this class). The big benefit here is that we can reuse the generic class extension code. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- diff --git a/meta/classes/na

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] package_rpm.bbclass: fix the arch (replace "-" with "_")

2012-08-28 Thread Robert Yang
rpm can't use the "-" as the arch, which causes problem, e.g., when MACHINE = "beagleboard": * The arch should be armv7a-vfp-neon, but rpm only takes the armv7a, this is incorrect since it is mixed with real arch armv7a. * The nativesdk's arch should be i686-nativesdk (or x86_64-nativesdk), b

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] package_rpm.bbclass: fix the arch (replace "-" with "_")

2012-08-28 Thread Robert Yang
Test info: MACHINE = beagleboard/mpc8315e-rdb/qemux86 PACKAGE_CLASSES = package_rpm $ bitbake core-image-minimal core-image-sato meta-toolchain \ meta-toolchain-sdk adt-installer meta-ide-support $ bitbake package-index $ runqemu qemux86 (when MACHINE=qemux86) All of them are OK. Note:

[OE-core] [PATCH] nativesdk: Switch to using nativesdk as a prefix, not a suffix

2012-08-28 Thread Richard Purdie
As discussed on the mailing lists, using a suffix to package names is hard and has lead to many recipes having to do PKGSUFFIX games. Its looking extremely hard to scale nativesdk much further without hacking many recipes. By comparison, using a prefix like multilib does works much better and doe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: allow for more flexibility related to hostname

2012-08-28 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 28 aug. 2012, om 15:45 heeft Mark Asselstine het volgende geschreven: > On August 28, 2012 08:47:33 Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 27 aug. 2012, om 17:24 heeft Mark Asselstine > het volgende geschreven: >>> Current logic used to create the /etc/hostname file is fairly >>> restrictive and doesn't a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] task-core-basic: drop portmap

2012-08-28 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 2 jun. 2012, om 04:24 heeft Christopher Larson het volgende geschreven: > Both rpcbind and portmap are RPC port mappers. Having both is redundant. Chose > rpcbind over portmap as rpcbind supports ipv6, nfs4, and builds without the > glibc rpc headers, which have been obsoleted in glibc 2.14.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] dpkg: upgrade to 1.16.8

2012-08-28 Thread Saul Wold
On 08/28/2012 07:03 AM, Constantin Musca wrote: On 08/28/2012 05:02 PM, Constantin Musca wrote: autofoo.patch: removed - the patch is not used check_version: adapted to the new version - adapt the linux-wrs kernel version, which has character '_' - remove the first-char-digit-check (

[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST 00/15] Misc Fixes

2012-08-28 Thread Saul Wold
Richard, This includes some build related fixes for perf along with the cleanup's in the archiver from Robert. There are also 2 changes for meta-yocto pending (one left over from Tom bsp-yocto set, and a local.conf.sample.extended for the achiver class changes). I removed the kernel updates and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] dpkg: upgrade to 1.16.8

2012-08-28 Thread Constantin Musca
On 08/28/2012 05:02 PM, Constantin Musca wrote: autofoo.patch: removed - the patch is not used check_version: adapted to the new version - adapt the linux-wrs kernel version, which has character '_' - remove the first-char-digit-check (as the 1.15.8.5 version does) dpkg-de

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] dpkg: upgrade to 1.16.8

2012-08-28 Thread Constantin Musca
autofoo.patch: removed - the patch is not used check_version: adapted to the new version - adapt the linux-wrs kernel version, which has character '_' - remove the first-char-digit-check (as the 1.15.8.5 version does) dpkg-deb-avoid-fflush.patch: removed - the patch

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2012-08-28 Thread Saul Wold
On 08/26/2012 09:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, Here's some changes that I've staged over the past week or so, everything checks out here, and there are some good changes in this set of -stable updates, and and the linker fix from Khem. I've also got a small tools fix here as well,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: allow for more flexibility related to hostname

2012-08-28 Thread Mark Asselstine
On August 28, 2012 08:47:33 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 27 aug. 2012, om 17:24 heeft Mark Asselstine het volgende geschreven: > > Current logic used to create the /etc/hostname file is fairly > > restrictive and doesn't allow for easy customization since the > > variable 'hostname' is local to the base

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] task-core-basic: drop portmap

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 01 June 2012 19:24:54 Christopher Larson wrote: > Both rpcbind and portmap are RPC port mappers. Having both is redundant. > Chose rpcbind over portmap as rpcbind supports ipv6, nfs4, and builds > without the glibc rpc headers, which have been obsoleted in glibc 2.14. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [OE-core] Package re-order fallouts?

2012-08-28 Thread Samuel Stirtzel
2012/8/28 Paul Eggleton : > On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: >> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the >> package order has been changed. > > You say "next", do you mean denzil-next or master? master Meant the next branch of the setup-scripts: htt

Re: [OE-core] Package re-order fallouts?

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the > package order has been changed. You say "next", do you mean denzil-next or master? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _

[OE-core] Package re-order fallouts?

2012-08-28 Thread Samuel Stirtzel
Hi, after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the package order has been changed. This causes failures with non symlink .so files in -dev packages for various meta-kde recipes. What is the preferred way to fix this? Currently done something like: unset FILES_SOLIBSDEV and add a

Re: [OE-core] RFC: OE-Core task rework

2012-08-28 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 10:46:49 Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi all, > > There have been a few requests to review the task recipes (i.e. package > groups) provided by OE-Core, and indeed these have not really been looked at > seriously since OE-Core was created. Ideally I think we want them to be >