On Friday 01 June 2012 19:24:54 Christopher Larson wrote: > Both rpcbind and portmap are RPC port mappers. Having both is redundant. > Chose rpcbind over portmap as rpcbind supports ipv6, nfs4, and builds > without the glibc rpc headers, which have been obsoleted in glibc 2.14. > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <kerg...@gmail.com> > --- > meta/recipes-extended/tasks/task-core-basic.bb | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/tasks/task-core-basic.bb > b/meta/recipes-extended/tasks/task-core-basic.bb index 8bab0db..a810d37 > 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/tasks/task-core-basic.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/tasks/task-core-basic.bb > @@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ RDEPENDS_task-core-sys-services = "\ > nfs-utils \ > pciutils \ > libpcre \ > - portmap \ > rpcbind \ > sysfsutils \ > tcp-wrappers \
I came across this while digging back through the history in master. Does this mean we ought to be switching to rpcbind in our other tasks which currently bring in portmap (e.g. task-base-nfs, task-core-apps-console)? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
