Mark Hatle wrote on 2011-04-29:
> (adding oe-core back to the list as it got dropped off my previous reply)
>
> On 4/28/11 4:04 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 10:19 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> On 4/28/11 4:22 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:08:03PM +0800,
On 04/28/2011 09:30 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 04/28/2011 02:05 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi Darren,
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
The following logging mechanisms are to be used in bash functions of recipes.
They are intended to map one to one in intention and output fo
On 04/28/2011 02:05 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Hi Darren,
>
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> The following logging mechanisms are to be used in bash functions of recipes.
>> They are intended to map one to one in intention and output format with the
>> python recipe logg
On 04/28/2011 02:25 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:51 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>> On 04/25/2011 10:14 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> Right, so for clarification, for 2.4 kernels, images should be built
>>> using just th
On 04/28/2011 08:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 03/21/2011 03:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 03/21/2011 11:23 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
Ubuntu has moved eglibc to /usr/lib/${arch}-linux-gnu and
/lib/${arch}-linux-gnu so we need that to be added to glibpth
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 03:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> On 03/21/2011 11:23 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>> Ubuntu has moved eglibc to /usr/lib/${arch}-linux-gnu and
>>> /lib/${arch}-linux-gnu so we need that to be added to glibpth in
>>> Configure.
>>>
>>>
On 03/21/2011 03:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 03/21/2011 11:23 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
Ubuntu has moved eglibc to /usr/lib/${arch}-linux-gnu and
/lib/${arch}-linux-gnu so we need that to be added to glibpth in
Configure.
Currently we set LD=ld in environment for recipes inheriting native
class. This o
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 01:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Koen Kooi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why not move those srcrevs into the recipe? IIRC these ones aren't
>>> affected by RPs concerns
>>
>> I am ok doing that but here
>>
>> ht
On 04/27/2011 01:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Why not move those srcrevs into the recipe? IIRC these ones aren't affected by
RPs concerns
I am ok doing that but here
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-April/001536.html
it
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> Checksums and timestamps are not enough to determine a logical progression of
> the components.
>
> We need something that informs the user where these changes fit in the grand
> scheme of things. Are they newer or older then a recipe of the sa
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> I've started working on getting bitbake and OE-Core building on MacOS X. So
>> far
>> what I have are some pretty hacky patches.. but they should be a reasonable
>> start.
>>
>
> You might
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 16:12 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> I've started working on getting bitbake and OE-Core building on MacOS X. So
> far
> what I have are some pretty hacky patches.. but they should be a reasonable
> start.
>
> I've pushed my changes to the git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> I've started working on getting bitbake and OE-Core building on MacOS X. So
> far
> what I have are some pretty hacky patches.. but they should be a reasonable
> start.
>
You might be interested in
http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openem
(adding oe-core back to the list as it got dropped off my previous reply)
On 4/28/11 4:04 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 10:19 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 4/28/11 4:22 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:08:03PM +0800, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
Hi Guys,
>>>
I've started working on getting bitbake and OE-Core building on MacOS X. So far
what I have are some pretty hacky patches.. but they should be a reasonable
start.
I've pushed my changes to the git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
repository and the "mhatle/macosx/bitbake" and "mhatle/macosx/
On 04/28/2011 03:13 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2011 18:56:09 Darren Hart wrote:
>> Is the SED_* tag a common search/replace mechanism in OE recipes? It's
>> fine, I'm just wondering if there is an accepted best practice for this
>> sort of thing. I know we do some sed replac
The bulk of this patch is based on Chris Larson's collection.inc,
but refactored for use inside bitbake, and for layers.
Adds two new configuration options:
LAYER_UNPACKDIR - directory to unpack downloaded layers for use in
configuration.
LAYER_REMOTE_STASH - location to store downloaded layers
> * Maybe need to split into "bootstrap" steps (e.g where pseduo is
established, layers downloaded etc)
So for the most part, the last product we shipped was largely arranged
in this manner. We were using collections, but in many cases layers is
just a reimplementation at a lower level(which
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> I got my OMAP target to build with GCC-4.6.0 using the latest
> Poky tree after a fresh rebuild. Sadly, the Linux kernel (2.6.37.3)
> does not run correctly when built with this compiler. It
> fails when enumerating the USB bus :-(
>
> Are t
Missed prefix mail. Resent due to limited response.
> * Maybe need to split into "bootstrap" steps (e.g where pseduo is
> established, layers downloaded etc)
So for the most part, the last product we shipped was largely arranged
in this manner. We were using collections, but in many cases layer
I got my OMAP target to build with GCC-4.6.0 using the latest
Poky tree after a fresh rebuild. Sadly, the Linux kernel (2.6.37.3)
does not run correctly when built with this compiler. It
fails when enumerating the USB bus :-(
Are there known issues with the Linux kernel on ARM and GCC-4.6?
--
On 04/28/2011 01:30 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 25 apr 2011, om 19:10 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Hi Koen,
>>
>> On 04/23/2011 07:47 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Over the holidays I was trying to build some externel kernel modules
>>> and they failed to build because
From: Mei Lei
This pull request will fix some bugs in meta/lib/oe/distro_check.py.
The recipe meta-ide-support's alias is Poky, but not defined in
distro_exceptions, this will lead an error.
The compare_in_distro_packages_list function omit a split process, this will
lead to a form issue.
Chan
From: Mei Lei
The recipe meta-ide-support's alias is Poky, but not defined in
distro_exceptions, this will lead an error.
The compare_in_distro_packages_list function omit a split process, this will
lead to a form issue.
Change the log file generate way, use symbolic links link to the latest lo
Op 28 apr 2011, om 12:13 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2011 18:56:09 Darren Hart wrote:
>> Is the SED_* tag a common search/replace mechanism in OE recipes? It's
>> fine, I'm just wondering if there is an accepted best practice for this
>> sort of thing. I k
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 18:56:09 Darren Hart wrote:
> Is the SED_* tag a common search/replace mechanism in OE recipes? It's
> fine, I'm just wondering if there is an accepted best practice for this
> sort of thing. I know we do some sed replacements of /usr/bin and /etc.
Is there a more approp
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:51 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On 04/25/2011 10:14 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >
> > Right, so for clarification, for 2.4 kernels, images should be built
> > using just the modutils_2.4.27.bb recipe. For 2.6 kernels, image
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:08:03PM +0800, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here is the design of network based PR service, please help to review and
> give you comment. Thanks a lot!
Hi,
looks good, just wondering if we can use the same mechanism for
LOCALCOUNT numbers in SRCPV, we can even us
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 11:23 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 01:17 AM, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 0:29:21 -0700
> > Saul Wold wrote:
> >
> >> From: Khem Raj
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> This is initial set of patches for testing them out
> >> The patches need documentation is
Hi Saul,
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> This has been reviewed and build on x86 and ARM, I have worked also to build
> full world, it's almost there, qemu on the target needs a few more tweaks,
> it's
> closer!
Thanks, I merged apart from 3 patches which I've replied to wi
Hi Darren,
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> The following logging mechanisms are to be used in bash functions of recipes.
> They are intended to map one to one in intention and output format with the
> python recipe logging functions of a similar naming convention: bb.plain(),
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:30 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Khem Raj
>
> inherit gettext should do it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc |6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/util-linu
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Khem Raj
>
> Checking for gettext is not needed when --disable-nls is used
>
> Let user know what variant of gettext is missing e.g. gettext-native,
> gettext-nativesdk etc, reveals a bit more for user
>
> Check for virtual/gettext
>
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Khem Raj
>
> Ensure gettext and gettext-native are removed from DEPENDS when
> not using NLS
>
> Use append instead of += to get gettext dependecies processed
> correctly in all cases
>
> Dont remove gettext-native for native recipes a
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Khem Raj
>
> Hi
>
> This is initial set of patches for testing them out
> The patches need documentation is pending
> Some patches especially uclibc related are not
> needed they must be dropped.
>
> This is not the final version yet.
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Khem Raj
>
> Cosmetic change to make syntax highlighters happy
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
I'll take the patch but shouldn't someone fix the syntax highlighters as
the syntax is obviously correct and works ;-).
Cheers,
Richard
___
Op 25 apr 2011, om 19:10 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
> Hi Koen,
>
> On 04/23/2011 07:47 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Over the holidays I was trying to build some externel kernel modules
>> and they failed to build because linux/bounds.h wasn't in sysroots.
>>
>
>
> Accord
Adding oe-core list to CC:
Op 28 apr 2011, om 09:08 heeft Lu, Lianhao het volgende geschreven:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here is the design of network based PR service, please help to review and
> give you comment. Thanks a lot!
>
> By changing the BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER from "basic" to "basichash", the
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
