On 04/28/2011 02:05 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > Hi Darren, > > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >> The following logging mechanisms are to be used in bash functions of recipes. >> They are intended to map one to one in intention and output format with the >> python recipe logging functions of a similar naming convention: bb.plain(), >> bb.note(), etc. >> >> For the time being, all of these print only to the task logs. Future >> enhancements may integrate these calls with the bitbake logging >> infrastructure, >> allowing for printing to the console as appropriate. The interface and >> intention >> statements reflect that future goal. Once it is in place, no changes will be >> necessary to recipes using these logging mechanisms. > > This looks good but could you do a search and replace of any existing > users of the oe* functions and then remove them from base.bbclass > please? At the very least they should be calling the bb* equivalents. > I'd like to clean up this kind of thing as we go.
Sure thing. Is a follow-up patch acceptable or do you want me to resubmit these in one series? -- Darren > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
