On 04/28/2011 09:30 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 04/28/2011 02:05 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi Darren,
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
The following logging mechanisms are to be used in bash functions of recipes.
They are intended to map one to one in intention and output format with the
python recipe logging functions of a similar naming convention: bb.plain(),
bb.note(), etc.
For the time being, all of these print only to the task logs. Future
enhancements may integrate these calls with the bitbake logging infrastructure,
allowing for printing to the console as appropriate. The interface and intention
statements reflect that future goal. Once it is in place, no changes will be
necessary to recipes using these logging mechanisms.
This looks good but could you do a search and replace of any existing
users of the oe* functions and then remove them from base.bbclass
please? At the very least they should be calling the bb* equivalents.
I'd like to clean up this kind of thing as we go.
Sure thing. Is a follow-up patch acceptable or do you want me to
resubmit these in one series?
Since we have pulled this set, a follow-up patch would be most excellent!
Thanks
Sau!
--
Darren
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
