https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378449
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378449
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Verner ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #16)
> Pointing to lines of code is bad, he pretends like he understands the code,
> which he doesn't, so it makes him less credible.
I know some user c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379296
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378449
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376300
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Verner ---
Oh, sorry, I missed that...
Now that I tried pringint it, my system completely locked up :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376300
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Verner ---
Created attachment 104028
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104028&action=edit
How it displays the pdf when forms are hidden
Works fine here
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376300
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Verner ---
Created attachment 104027
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104027&action=edit
How it displays the pdf when forms are shown
Works fine here...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376300
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376459
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373855
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
vatar still appears next to
it? Should I be worried that someone has taken over my account? Or is this a
bug in reviewboard? Or is this how reviewboard functions?
- Jonathan Verner
On Nov. 3, 2016, 7:30 a.m., Jonathan Verner wrote:
>
> ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367071
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366785
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365993
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
e and people (including me)
have a lot of other things to do, but still: is there anything else that needs
to be fixed in this patch? Is my explanation of the usecase clear and
convincing enough?
- Jonathan Verner
On April 6, 2016, 8:01 p.m., Jonathan Verner
annotation revisions.
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/04/11/2f84d42c-e317-4d3e-968b-8b873945d51a__test.pdf
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365843
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365806
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Verner ---
P.S. It works for me (Kubuntu 14.04, Qt: 4.8.6, KDE Development Platform:
4.14.13, Okular: 0.20.3)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365806
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
/uploaded/files/2016/04/11/2f84d42c-e317-4d3e-968b-8b873945d51a__test.pdf
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361644
Bug ID: 361644
Summary: Improve review workflow
Product: okular
Version: 0.24.0
Platform: Compiled Sources
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
can be edited and
properly saved back.
File Attachments (updated)
Test file with annotation revisions.
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/04/11/2f84d42c-e317-4d3e-968b-8b873945d51a__test.pdf
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
back.
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
t.cpp a044895c1935c587552e875a98627e58d19ed443
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/diff/
Testing
---
Tested both manually on several files and also provided a simple automatic test
in mainshelltest.cpp.
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing
org/r/127541/#comment64092>
`m_fileformatsscanned` has to be valid at this moment and even if it were
not, the else block would fail (This is not strictly related to the feature,
but as I was refactoring the code anyway, I decided to get rid of this.).
- Jonathan Verner
On April 5, 2
il. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/#review94259
---
On April 5, 2016, 7:07 a.m., Jonathan Verner wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generat
tests/mainshelltest.cpp a044895c1935c587552e875a98627e58d19ed443
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/diff/
Testing
---
Tested both manually on several files and also provided a simple automatic test
in mainshelltest.cpp.
Thanks,
Jonathan V
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361292
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Verner ---
I tried implementing the feature; see:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/diff/
Testing
---
Tested both manually on several files and also provided a simple automatic test
in mainshelltest.cpp.
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361292
Bug ID: 361292
Summary: Import annotations from a different file
Product: okular
Version: 0.24.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360201
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359242
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358764
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358634
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319839
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Verner ---
(In reply to Walter Rudametkin from comment #3)
> Hi,
>
> Is there anything missing for your patch to be applied? I'd really like to
> see this in Okular.
>
> Regards,
It is not fully t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358371
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Verner ---
> Now that you mention it, I just checked with evince and have the same
> troubles there. Should I maybe file this as an XFCE bug?
>
> I appear to have poppler library version 0.30.0
>
> $ pd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358371
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Verner ---
(In reply to wgzimmer-zueri from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jonathan Verner from comment #2)
> > Works for me, here (Ubuntu 14.04, Okular 0.20.3). When I open the document,
> > the forms have b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358371
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Verner ---
Created attachment 96814
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96814&action=edit
Okular 0.20.3 showing the form fields
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358371
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356816
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351306
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348644
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Verner ---
How about:
"Save as" ... saves the document under a new name including all the changes
(annotations, form contents, etc.), provided the document backend supports
saving changes. Note that, due to th
> On June 11, 2015, 11:16 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > Please note that the long term solution is to completely change the logic.
> > https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=251&t=122750
>
> Jonathan Verner wrote:
> aaah... :-) Now I see that there is even a b
try to add the unit tests, but
unfortunately, due to real life (tm), I probably won't have time till the end
of october :-(
- Jonathan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/1236
viewboard.kde.org/r/124069/#review81377
---
On June 11, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Jonathan Verner wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> ht
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315552
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Verner ---
It was pointed out to me by Luigi Toscano that there was some discussion of
reworking the whole 'saving annotations' logic (see
https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=251&t=122750). Looking at the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348642
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315552
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348642
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Verner ---
No problem :-)
Note that now I found that this has already been reported (bug #315552) so it
should probably be marked as a duplicate. When reporting this wishlist I didn't
find the duplicate bugs...
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348642
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Verner ---
I tried implementing the first part (without the option in the settings). The
relevant changes are posted to reviewboard for review here:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124069/
--
You are receiving this mail
l as the menu action that they work.
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348644
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Verner ---
O.K., so I looked at the source code and it seems the situation is as I
guessed. It also turns out that the 'Save Copy As' has a slight advantage over
using plain cp in two cases:
-- the file is a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348644
Bug ID: 348644
Summary: Explain difference between 'Save as...' and 'Save copy
as...' in the handbook (and possibly remove the
second)
Product: okular
Version: 0.20.2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348642
Bug ID: 348642
Summary: Add a Save menu action to complement the Save As ...
Product: okular
Version: 0.20.2
Platform: Kubuntu Packages
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345836
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319839
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
/r/123676/diff/
Testing
---
I manually tested both the --unique and the --unique-per-file options.
Both behave as expected and do not interfere with each other.
I am not sure how to write an automated test, though.
Thanks,
Jonathan Verner
_
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345789
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343101
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342548
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341244
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341118
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329740
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338088
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Verner ---
Thanks for clarifying. Online discussion has the drawback that one can't see
non-verbal hints and without them, as I said, your second sentence sounded
a bit harsh to me :-)
As for the feature, I won'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338088
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281813
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Verner 2011-09-15
11:13:53 ---
Sorry, I misinterpreted your comment. But this is good news :-) I will have to
look at poppler again.
(In reply to comment #11)
>
> As Albert said, currently poppler (t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281813
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Verner 2011-09-15
09:50:54 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Is it a good idea to include a rendered formula? This way, we cannot adjust
> font size and color easily...
As Albert said, it would have the benefi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281813
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277350
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Verner 2011-07-08
17:40:58 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> The only difference I can see here is the attitude of the maintainers and I
> think this is probably to do with the attitude to the shell - I presum
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277350
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Verner 2011-07-08
12:06:57 ---
Why don't you redirect the output, e.g. run okular as follows
$ okular file.pdf >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment
Sorry,
I have forgotten to attach the promised patch. So here goes...
Jonathan Verner
Index: cmake/modules/FindLIBFONTCONFIG.cmake
===
--- cmake/modules/FindLIBFONTCONFIG.cmake (revision 0)
+++ cmake/modules/FindLIBFONTCONFIG.cmake
Hi,
so I've given up on the GSOC project, but I still have some interest
in saving annotations from Okular :-)
> Given that slowly poppler is starting to support editing, it would be a
> better idea to just continue the work there
Unfortunately, I am not sure I would be up to this task. I will
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271940
Summary: Freetext annotations covered by Yellow rectangles
Product: okular
Version: 0.12.2
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Hello,
my name is Jonathan Verner and I am a PhD student of Mathematics in Prague.
I was contemplating to submit a GSOC project to enable okular to store
annotations in pdf files. My idea was to use the podofo library to write
the annotations back into the file. It could either be implemented
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Additional Comments From jonathanv post cz 2008-03-25 21:21 ---
O.K. So I've prepared some packages whi
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Additional Comments From jonathanv post cz 2008-03-24 13:04 ---
I have started to work on a quick and d
77 matches
Mail list logo
