Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 113973: Proof of concept magnifying glass found in old kdvi (or current xdvi)

2014-02-22 Thread Michal Humpula
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113973/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 6:01 p.m.) Review request for Okular. Changes -

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 113973: Proof of concept magnifying glass found in old kdvi (or current xdvi)

2014-02-22 Thread Michal Humpula
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113973/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 5:41 p.m.) Review request for Okular. Changes -

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 113973: Proof of concept magnifying glass found in old kdvi (or current xdvi)

2014-02-22 Thread Michal Humpula
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113973/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 5:27 p.m.) Review request for Okular. Changes -

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 330820] Scaling to fit print margins incorrectly scales cropped page

2014-02-22 Thread Stephen Mollett
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330820 --- Comment #7 from Stephen Mollett --- (In reply to comment #6) > It's a different bug, so yes, sure, please do. False alarm - it's the PPDs which are being far too conservative. They specify 18/36-point margins for most of the printers I have access

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 113973: Proof of concept magnifying glass found in old kdvi (or current xdvi)

2014-02-22 Thread Michal Humpula
> On Feb. 19, 2014, 11:04 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > ui/pageview.cpp, line 393 > > > > > > Yes, what about remembering the size of last time? Well, it sholdn't be resizeable. But I was thinking about dif

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 115759: Fix for Bug 326207

2014-02-22 Thread Jaan Vajakas
> On Feb. 15, 2014, 3:13 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > tests/searchtest.cpp, line 64 > > > > > > please use kDebug and remove the iostream include > > Jaan Vajakas wrote: > Actually I wanted something li

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 115759: Fix for Bug 326207

2014-02-22 Thread Jaan Vajakas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115759/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 2:51 p.m.) Review request for Okular. Changes -

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 115759: Fix for Bug 326207

2014-02-22 Thread Jaan Vajakas
> On Feb. 15, 2014, 3:13 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > tests/searchtest.cpp, line 64 > > > > > > please use kDebug and remove the iostream include > > Jaan Vajakas wrote: > Actually I wanted something li

Re: [Okular-devel] Review Request 115759: Fix for Bug 326207

2014-02-22 Thread Jaan Vajakas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115759/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 12:50 p.m.) Review request for Okular. Changes