> On Feb. 15, 2014, 3:13 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > tests/searchtest.cpp, line 64
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115759/diff/1/?file=244162#file244162line64>
> >
> >     please use kDebug and remove the iostream include
> 
> Jaan Vajakas wrote:
>     Actually I wanted something like QCOMPARE or an exception, so that the 
> test were halted and error message shown. But QCOMPARE unfortunately doesn't 
> work inside functions that are not tests themselves and when I tried 
> exception throwing I got a compiler error that exceptions are disabled (and I 
> don't know how the Qt test framework would handle them even if they were 
> enabled). Then I chose stderr instead of kDebug since kDebug output can be 
> disabled in kdebugdialog but I thought the test's reason of failure should 
> always be shown (like the QCOMPARE error messages). But this is an 
> unimportant error message anyway (it can only appear if the tests in 
> searchtest.cpp themselves are incorrectly modified), so I don't oppose kDebug 
> either. Is it a good style to never use std::cout and std::cerr, even in 
> tests?
> 
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>     We just don't use iostreams much. If you need QCOMPARE just make the 
> function non static and bring it to the SearchTest object as non slot (so 
> it's not a test itself) and it should work.
> 
> Jaan Vajakas wrote:
>     Now in revision r2 I use QCOMPARE. Actually from my tests with Qt 4.8.5 
> it seemed there is no difference in the behavior of QCOMPARE, whether it is 
> called from a class member function or a global function: in either case it 
> prints an error message and returns from the function, but does not abort the 
> calling test function (i. e. does not behave like throwing an exception). But 
> either way this is undocumented behavior, as the documentation ( 
> http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qtest.html#QCOMPARE ) says "Note: This macro 
> can only be used in a test function that is invoked by the test framework.". 
> So actually now I am thinking that perhaps it would be better if I refactor 
> my function into a macro – then QCOMPARE would be used in accordance with the 
> documentation.

Now in diff r3 I refactored searchtest.cpp so that QCOMPARE is used in 
accordance with the Qt documentation.


- Jaan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115759/#review49831
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 22, 2014, 2:51 p.m., Jaan Vajakas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115759/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 2:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 326207
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326207
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Here is a patch to fix Bug 326207. It was a simple bug in the XY Cut layout 
> recognition code that made it too eager to see columns everywhere. I also 
> removed the dependence of the layout analysis algorithms on the display DPI 
> (introduced by the recently added feature of using KScreen) to make their 
> behavior more predictable and reproducible. I added tests for this bug and 
> also refactored SearchTest a little to use QVectors instead of bare arrays.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/textpage.cpp a95f7c6 
>   tests/searchtest.cpp caceb6f 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115759/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> added automatic tests and tested manually on some PDF files
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jaan Vajakas
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Reply via email to