Re: [OAUTH-WG] [scim] Simple Federation Deployment server to server

+1, this seems a better fit for openid. — Justin > On Apr 6, 2016, at 9:05 AM, Brian Campbell wrote: > > OpenID ... ? > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Anthony Nadalin > wrote: > Good question, since SCIM does not really provide an authorization model and >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [scim] Simple Federation Deployment server to server

OpenID ... ? On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Anthony Nadalin wrote: > Good question, since SCIM does not really provide an authorization model > and Oauth does not do provisioning this is sort of caught in the middle, so > if I had to pick I would pick Oauth as this is a generic server to server

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [scim] Simple Federation Deployment server to server

Good question, since SCIM does not really provide an authorization model and Oauth does not do provisioning this is sort of caught in the middle, so if I had to pick I would pick Oauth as this is a generic server to server issue From: Hardt, Dick [mailto:d...@amazon.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 6