Re: [OAUTH-WG] dpop terminogly

Hello you want to better help me understand what is this you referring too? > On Apr 4, 2021, at 5:15 PM, Nikos Fotiou wrote: > > Hi I am wondering if the following terminology is more appropriate for the > DPoP draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fett-oauth-dpop-04): > - Since a DPoP pr

[OAUTH-WG] dpop terminogly

Hi I am wondering if the following terminology is more appropriate for the DPoP draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fett-oauth-dpop-04): - Since a DPoP proof is a JWT encoded in a JWS may be it is better to say "DPoP proof payload" instead of "DPoP proof body" (end of page 4). - For the same

[OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-12: (with COMMENT)

Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Ple

[OAUTH-WG] OAuth Interim Meeting - April 5th - RAR

All, The coming OAuth WG Interim meeting is this coming* Monday, April 5th, at 12:00 pm EDT.* The meeting will be focused on the RAR document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-rar/ The following link has links to the slide and draft and will be used to capture the notes and atten