Andrew Pinder, on 14 Jun, wrote:
> In message <20140613221516.gc1...@platypus.pepperfish.net>
> on 13 Jun 2014 Rob Kendrick wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:42:54PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
> > > > Couple people try moving it elsewhere (ie, outside !Boot.Resources),
> > > > and config
David Pitt, on 14 Jun, wrote:
[snip - !Cache memory issues]
Have spent an entertaining morning with this the penny finally dropped.
All the NetSurf needs to run its cache is a value for Cache$Dir pointing to
the chosen location.
--
David Pitt
On 14/06/14 13:48, David Pitt wrote:
> > All the NetSurf needs to run its cache is a value for Cache$Dir
> > pointing to the chosen location.
Indeed. The original proposal for Cache by Rob Kendrick[1] simply set
two variables in its !Run file. These were:
Caches$Write - Expands to where you
In message <539c4cfe.6020...@netsurf-browser.org>
on 14 Jun 2014 Michael Drake wrote:
> We recently decided to make use of "!Cache" as we assumed it would be
> suitable and correct. (None of the core developers are actually using
> RISC OS at the moment, so we hadn't checked it actually worked.
On 14/06/14 14:30, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>> We recently decided to make use of "!Cache" as we assumed it would be
>> suitable and correct. (None of the core developers are actually using
>> RISC OS at the moment, so we hadn't checked it actually worked.)
> If you give some clues as to how to te
In article <539c509c.8090...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
> Our options are to get Cache from
> http://www.snowstone.org.uk/riscos/
> fixed, and continue using it, or create our own simpler solution.
Having had a very *quick* look, it seems !Cache is implementing a
method of bein
On 14 Jun, Michael Drake wrote in message
<539c509c.8090...@netsurf-browser.org>:
>
>
> On 14/06/14 14:30, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>
> > > We recently decided to make use of "!Cache" as we assumed it would be
> > > suitable and correct. (None of the core developers are actually using
> > > RI
In article ,
Steve Fryatt wrote:
> I don't run NetSurf during the boot sequence
Neither do I.
--
Chris Johnson
On 14 Jun 2014 Steve Fryatt wrote:
> On 14 Jun, Michael Drake wrote in message
> <539c509c.8090...@netsurf-browser.org>:
>>
>>
>> On 14/06/14 14:30, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>>
We recently decided to make use of "!Cache" as we assumed it would be
suitable and correct. (None of the
In message
on 14 Jun 2014 Steve Fryatt wrote:
> I don't run NetSurf during the boot sequence -- are all the people seeing
> issues doing that? What are people's Next slots configured to during the
> boot process?
On completion of booting, my Next slot is set to 640k. I don't know
how to tell
10 matches
Mail list logo
