On 6 Nov 2018 David Pitt wrote:
> Richard Porter, on 6 Nov, wrote:
>> Anyone else getting this? I've had it from one or two addresses, for
>> example: http://www.natwest.com/global/customer-charter/g1/ideas-bank.ashx
>>
>> gives me the error "Couldn't resolve hostname" yet the host name appears
On 06/11/2018, Richard Porter wrote:
> Anyone else getting this? I've had it from one or two addresses,
> for example:
> http://www.natwest.com/global/customer-charter/g1/ideas-bank.ashx
>
> gives me the error "Couldn't resolve hostname" yet the host name appears
> to be OK. What's more if I delet
Richard Porter, on 6 Nov, wrote:
> Anyone else getting this? I've had it from one or two addresses, for
> example: http://www.natwest.com/global/customer-charter/g1/ideas-bank.ashx
>
> gives me the error "Couldn't resolve hostname" yet the host name appears
> to be OK. What's more if I delete the
Anyone else getting this? I've had it from one or two addresses,
for example:
http://www.natwest.com/global/customer-charter/g1/ideas-bank.ashx
gives me the error "Couldn't resolve hostname" yet the host name appears
to be OK. What's more if I delete the last element NetSurf does resolve
the hos
In article <7fed4f7354@abbeypress.net>, Jim Nagel
wrote:
> I see this more and more often of late: large grey areas on a web
> page as displayed by Netsurf. Drag a menu (or other window) over
> the grey, and the trail goes white. You never know what content
> is never shown.
> Example:
> h
I see this more and more often of late: large grey areas on a web page
as displayed by Netsurf. Drag a menu (or other window) over the grey,
and the trail goes white. You never know what content is never shown.
Example: http://www.cnet.com/products/hp-color-laserjet-cp2025/specs/
Is it becau
I get the infamous "NetSurf is running out of memory" error when
clicking the following URL:
http://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/
NetSurf #417, ARMini/RISC OS 5.19. NS 2.9 works.
Typing in the .co.uk equivalent (which blogspot.com addresses now
redirect to) also fails, so it must be something in
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 14:07 +, Richard Porter wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2009 Michael Drake wrote:
>
> > Let's stay on topic (NetSurf), please.
>
> OK, what about Google maps?
It contained an unclosed comment. We reported it to Google and they've
fixed it. This is not a bug in NetSurf.
John.
Richard Porter wrote:
OK, what about Google maps?
You mean some of the most complex javascript ever written and
specifically tailored for each major browers it runs on?
Would you like to guess which side of hell freezing over
it will work on Netsurf?
Cheers
---Dave
--
Email: dr...@druck.org
On 18 Feb 2009 Michael Drake wrote:
> Let's stay on topic (NetSurf), please.
OK, what about Google maps?
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
Disclaimer: Please imagine about 50 lines of point
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> A friend of mine makes use of the Dolphin stuff; the synthesiser that
> shipped with it was pretty dreadful.
We don't like to talk about that, it's utter sh*te, but we managed to ease
out the director responsible last year, and are rapidly elimating all trace
of it.
> Fort
In article <6553812f50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2009 David J. Ruck wrote:
> > The sort of modern natural voice synthesisers we are using in screen
> > readers for the visiually impared, have all sorts of parameters which
> > you can use to change the empha
On 18 Feb 2009 David J. Ruck wrote:
> The sort of modern natural voice synthesisers we are using in screen
> readers for the visiually impared, have all sorts of parameters which you
> can use to change the emphaisis. They actually read passages of text
> superbly well with, and honestly, sometime
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:21:08 +
"David J. Ruck" wrote:
> The sort of modern natural voice synthesisers we are using in screen
> readers for the visiually impared, have all sorts of parameters which
> you can use to change the emphaisis. They actually read passages of
> text superbly well with,
On 18 Feb 2009 JJ van Poll wrote:
> In message <502f57db9easg...@inspire.net.nz>
> Keith Hopper wrote:
>> In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
>>Tim Hill wrote:
>>> In article , Richard Porter
>>> wrote:
On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> The element which should be
On 18 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article , Richard Porter
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reaso
Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article ,
>Richard Porter wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I'm trying to imagine just how you would intonate 'emphasised' and
> > 'strong' so as to differentiate them. In fact I don't really know what
> > 'strong' means in this context.
>
> Neither do I, in general;
In message <502f57db9easg...@inspire.net.nz>
Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article , Richard Porter
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> In article , Richard Porter
> wrote:
> > On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> > > The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
> > > the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reason for the others being
> > > deprecated
In article ,
Richard Porter wrote:
[snip]
> I'm trying to imagine just how you would intonate 'emphasised' and
> 'strong' so as to differentiate them. In fact I don't really know what
> 'strong' means in this context.
Neither do I, in general; however, some combination of pauses,
risi
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> > The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
> > the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reason for the others being
> > deprecated
they're not
[Snip]
--
Tim Hill,
www.timil.com
On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
> the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reason for the others being deprecated
> is a desire to separate styling from the reason that a content needs a
> particular style - 'i' and 'b' imply a pa
In article <502eafeecaasg...@inspire.net.nz>, Keith Hopper
wrote:
> In article <920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>, Roger Darlington
> wrote:
> > On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
> > > In article , Richard Porter
> > > wrote:
> [snip]
> > > Yes, but Netsurf still inserts a spa
In article <4cd5fa2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> On 16 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
> > In article <920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
> >Roger Darlington wrote:
> >> On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
> >> > In article ,
> >> >Richard Porter wro
On 16 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article <920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
>Roger Darlington wrote:
>> On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
>> > In article ,
>> >Richard Porter wrote:
> [snip]
>> > Yes, but Netsurf still inserts a space after an end tag -
>
>> It does
In article <920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
> > In article ,
> >Richard Porter wrote:
[snip]
> > Yes, but Netsurf still inserts a space after an end tag -
> It doesn't if that end tag is .
> So a line like this w
On 16 Feb 2009, Tim Hill wrote:
> In article , Roger Darlington
> wrote:
>> On 3 Feb 2009, Tim Hill wrote:
>> >
>> > Just to follow-up this issue of Netsurf generating extra space, I
>> > have found an even simpler case:
>> >
>> > .(italic normal).
>> >
>> > I refer to the extra space w
In article , Roger Darlington
wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2009, Tim Hill wrote:
> >
> > Just to follow-up this issue of Netsurf generating extra space, I
> > have found an even simpler case:
> >
> > .(italic normal).
> >
> > I refer to the extra space which coincides with the .
> >
> And doesn'
On 3 Feb 2009, Tim Hill wrote:
>
> Just to follow-up this issue of Netsurf generating extra space, I have
> found an even simpler case:
>
> .(italic normal).
>
> I refer to the extra space which coincides with the .
>
And doesn't it also miss out the space between and 'normal' - it
d
On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article ,
>Richard Porter wrote:
>> On 1 Feb 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
>
>> > I thought browsers ignored white space and in no way thought that would
>> > be the problem. Other browsers obviously must not translate white space
>> > into an extra newline wher
Just to follow-up this issue of Netsurf generating extra space, I have
found an even simpler case:
.(italic normal).
I refer to the extra space which coincides with the .
Keith Hopper mentioned that ...
> This bug was reported a couple of years ago and still seems to occur
> under cert
In article <5026fac702asg...@inspire.net.nz>, Keith Hopper
wrote:
> In article , Richard Porter
> wrote:
> > On 1 Feb 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
[Snip]
> Netsurf still inserts a space after an end tag - so that
> an end tag immediately followed by a visible or invisible character can
> throw onto
In article ,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
> > I thought browsers ignored white space and in no way thought that would
> > be the problem. Other browsers obviously must not translate white space
> > into an extra newline where none is needed. Sometimes Netsurf does.
>
On 1 Feb 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
> I thought browsers ignored white space and in no way thought that would
> be the problem. Other browsers obviously must not translate white space
> into an extra newline where none is needed. Sometimes Netsurf does.
Any white space should translate into a single sp
In article <692fe22650.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
> > I have just noticed an oddity, even with the latest build. Please
> > will someone check that I'm not going mad and I haven't done
> > something inadvertent to the HTML in the extract her
On 1 Feb 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
> I have just noticed an oddity, even with the latest build. Please will
> someone check that I'm not going mad and I haven't done something
> inadvertent to the HTML in the extract here:
> http://www.timil.com/riscos/netsurf_query.htm
> This file is an extracted par
I have just noticed an oddity, even with the latest build. Please will
someone check that I'm not going mad and I haven't done something
inadvertent to the HTML in the extract here:
http://www.timil.com/riscos/netsurf_query.htm
This file is an extracted part of the very old index page which live
On 12 Aug 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 12 Aug 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
>>> On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> [snip]
>>
This fault is extremely sensitive to what else is on the page.
>>
>>> Try running the
On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
> > On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [snip]
>
> > > This fault is extremely sensitive to what else is on the page.
>
> > Try running the html through Tidy. The RISC OS port is
On 12 Aug 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>> This fault is extremely sensitive to what else is on the page.
> Try running the html through Tidy. The RISC OS port is at
> http://www.archifishal.co.uk/software/riscos/tidy.shtml and a use
On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> This fault is extremely sensitive to what else is on the page.
Try running the html through Tidy. The RISC OS port is at
http://www.archifishal.co.uk/software/riscos/tidy.shtml and a user guide
by Dave Raggett is at http://www.w3
On 12 Aug 2008 Gavin Wraith wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> On 11 Aug 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
>> It is definitely not mismatched < and > but I have narrowed down the
>> problem. One of the forms has an 'action' attribute which, including
>> encoded ampersands, quotes, etc.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
> It is definitely not mismatched < and > but I have narrowed down the
> problem. One of the forms has an 'action' attribute which, including
> encoded ampersands, quotes, etc. is 257 characters long. If I move the
> cl
On 11 Aug 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I've found a very curious problem. At the bottom of a long table which
>>contains several forms I get a spurious "<" cha
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've found a very curious problem. At the bottom of a long table which
>contains several forms I get a spurious "<" character. I have made a
>change but I can't se
I've found a very curious problem. At the bottom of a long table which
contains several forms I get a spurious "<" character. I have made a
change but I can't see a missing ">" or missing quote or anything that
would likely to cause it. When I stick in a &
46 matches
Mail list logo
