On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 03:27:59PM +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
> Sure makes one wish for that "Javasccript on/off" button on the Netsurf
> button bar that we've oft wished for!
Please remember that there is no RISC OS front end maintainer for
NetSurf anymore - nobody is working on the RISC OS front
In article <57f8148b3bd...@triffid.co.uk>, Dave
wrote:
> In article <5e2d0df857@6.abbeypress.net>, Jim Nagel
> wrote: [Snippy]
> > Have never found a way of programming Keystroke to do this. If
> > anyone has succeeded, please export the relevant Keystroke Selection
> > file & share it.
>
On 23 Sep, Brian Howlett wrote:
> Titanium here, JS enabled - works but vv slow with Netsurf 4851 and the
> previous version I had installed, 4845.
Actually, I may have to take that back - although it certainly worked in
4845, it eventually had a problem in 4851 - it just prints the JS to the
N
On 23 Sep, Dave wrote:
> I can confirm...
> #4850 with Javascript enabled, google.co.uk doesn't work.
> With Javascript disabled, google does work okay.
> VRPC-DL running RISC OS 6.20
Titanium here, JS enabled - works but vv slow with Netsurf 4851 and the
previous version I had installed, 4845
In article <5e2d0df857@6.abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
[Snippy]
> Have never found a way of programming Keystroke to do this. If anyone
> has succeeded, please export the relevant Keystroke Selection file &
> share it.
Must confess I've tried with Keystroke a lot of times but never s
Dave Sine Surnomine wrote on 23 Sep:
> #4850 with Javascript enabled, google.co.uk doesn't work.
> With Javascript disabled, google does work okay.
You're right!
Sure makes one wish for that "Javasccript on/off" button on the Netsurf
button bar that we've oft wished for! (Ancient Fresco had one
In article ,
David Pitt wrote:
> In message <20190923044637.GK1816@somnambulist.local>
> Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:27:52 +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
> >> For the past few days, telling Netsurf to go to http://google.co.uk
> >> results in an endless loop and no joy
In message <20190923044637.GK1816@somnambulist.local>
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:27:52 +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
>> For the past few days, telling Netsurf to go to http://google.co.uk
>> results in an endless loop and no joy. What's this all about?
>>
>> The Netsurf
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:27:52 +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
> For the past few days, telling Netsurf to go to http://google.co.uk
> results in an endless loop and no joy. What's this all about?
>
> The Netsurf URL bar changes from what I typed to this:
> http://www.google.co.uk/#spf=1569197185
In message <20151109232325.gd5...@kyllikki.org>
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:31:58PM +, David Pitt wrote:
> > Geoffrey Baxendale, on 9 Nov, wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I find that clicking in the search box on Google UK with JS enabled
> > > crashes Netsu
On 10 Nov 2015 "Chris Young"
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:23:25 +, Vincent Sanders wrote:
>> I think i fixed this, can people try and let me know?
> Working for me now, thanks Vince.
Confirmed here too. Many thanks.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Os) and family
Prestbury,
Vincent Sanders, on 9 Nov, wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:31:58PM +, David Pitt wrote:
> > Geoffrey Baxendale, on 9 Nov, wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I find that clicking in the search box on Google UK with JS enabled
> > > crashes Netsurf CI 3055. It's OK with JS off. (RISC OS 6.2
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:23:25 +, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> I think i fixed this, can people try and let me know?
Working for me now, thanks Vince.
Chris
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:31:58PM +, David Pitt wrote:
> Geoffrey Baxendale, on 9 Nov, wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I find that clicking in the search box on Google UK with JS enabled
> > crashes Netsurf CI 3055. It's OK with JS off. (RISC OS 6.2 on Kinetic)
> >
> > Has anyone else seen this or
In message
David Pitt wrote:
> Geoffrey Baxendale, on 9 Nov, wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I find that clicking in the search box on Google UK with JS enabled
> > crashes Netsurf CI 3055. It's OK with JS off. (RISC OS 6.2 on Kinetic)
> >
> > Has anyone else seen this or is it just me?
>
> S
Geoffrey Baxendale, on 9 Nov, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I find that clicking in the search box on Google UK with JS enabled
> crashes Netsurf CI 3055. It's OK with JS off. (RISC OS 6.2 on Kinetic)
>
> Has anyone else seen this or is it just me?
Same here on two instances of OS4.39 VRPC on Windows 7, but
In article <54c34a2274joh...@ukgateway.net>, John Williams
wrote:
> In article <54c3467e90ris...@gotadsl.co.uk>, Richard Ashbery
> wrote:
> > I've just tried Google again with Javascript off and a search
> > works normally. Anyone able to confirm?
> Yes, it's fine again!
> Perhaps my feedba
On 13 May 2015 as I do recall,
Richard Ashbery wrote:
> In article <54c2328532joh...@ukgateway.net>, John Williams
> I've just tried Google again with Javascript off and a search works
> normally. Anyone able to confirm?
>
Excellent - I'm amazed. I was about to report a total lack of
In message <54c34dbdb8brian.jord...@btinternet.com>
Brian Jordan wrote:
> In article <54c3467e90ris...@gotadsl.co.uk>,
>Richard Ashbery wrote:
>> In article <54c2328532joh...@ukgateway.net>, John Williams
>> wrote:
>> > In article <1c3b90c054.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard P
In article <54c3467e90ris...@gotadsl.co.uk>,
Richard Ashbery wrote:
> In article <54c2328532joh...@ukgateway.net>, John Williams
> wrote:
> > In article <1c3b90c054.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
> > wrote:
> > > I think it's absolutely essential that we have a javascript
> >
In article <54c3467e90ris...@gotadsl.co.uk>,
Richard Ashbery wrote:
> I've just tried Google again with Javascript off and a search works
> normally. Anyone able to confirm?
Yes, it's fine again!
Perhaps my feedback was noted! Message-ID: <54c0f9056fjoh...@ukgateway.net>
> I have used the S
In article <54c2328532joh...@ukgateway.net>, John Williams
wrote:
> In article <1c3b90c054.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
> wrote:
> > I think it's absolutely essential that we have a javascript
> > on/off button on the toolbar. If javescript is off google won't
> > work and if i
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 16:05:47 +0100, Chris Newman wrote:
> In article <6fb323c254@abbeypress.net>,
>Jim Nagel wrote:
> > Richard Porter wrote on 8 May:
> > > I think it's absolutely essential that we have a javascript on/off
> > > button on the toolbar. If javescript is off google won'
In article <6fb323c254@abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> Richard Porter wrote on 8 May:
> > I think it's absolutely essential that we have a javascript on/off
> > button on the toolbar. If javescript is off google won't work and if
> > it's on streetmap.co.uk won't work.
> I fourth the
Bernard Boase wrote on 8 May:
> One suggestion would be to use https://startpage.com instead.
> It claims to:
> - be the world's most private search engine,
> - use Google in the background on your behalf anyway, and
> - not to record the user's IP address.
> We don't have to wait for Google to m
Richard Porter wrote on 8 May:
> I think it's absolutely essential that we have a javascript on/off
> button on the toolbar. If javescript is off google won't work and if
> it's on streetmap.co.uk won't work.
I fourth the motion.
--
Jim Nagelwww.archivemag.co.uk
On 9 May 2015, Richard Ashbery wrote:
> In article <54c0f71aa9li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
>>> But that doesn't work on Netsurf :-( It just oscillates the same
>>> :-(
>> Sorry, I've confused myself by togling JS once too many times.
>> The search script on my www site does wo
In article <54c0f71aa9li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
> > But that doesn't work on Netsurf :-( It just oscillates the same
> > :-(
> Sorry, I've confused myself by togling JS once too many times.
> The search script on my www site does work with JF off: Relevant
> bit is
> act
On 8 May, b.bo...@bcs.org typed:
> One suggestion would be to use https://startpage.com instead.
On 9 May, r...@minijem.plus.com typed:
> Also have you tried clicking "Advanced"? I think you can supply a
> domain to search but it becomes unusable on NetSurf.
Agreed.
Even where startpage.com wo
On 9 May 2015 Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> The search script on my www site does work with JF off: Relevant bit is
>
> http://www.google.com/custom>
>
>
>
>
> Search WWW
>
>
>
> Save that as search/html, re-type is as faf (html) and use it
Why only one radio button? The script I
On 9 May 2015 Chris Dewhurst wrote:
> Like Tim Hill I make use of duckduckgo.com. And there is
> https://uk.search.yahoo.com
> which works with Netsurf.
The problem I find with Yahoo! is that I can't download images. That
used to be no problem with Google. Also you have to be very careful to
On 9 May 2015, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> In article <3145b6c054.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
>Roger Darlington wrote:
>> On 8 May 2015, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
>>> Another way of using Google is, for example
>>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?&q=Acacia
>>> Just double click o
On 9 May 2015 Harriet Bazley wrote:
> The only contact details I could find was tweeting @google - looks as if
> they do respond to individual mentions on Twitter, though it mostly seems to
> be people complaining about disappearing Google+ accounts.
I got this link from a device alert after sig
On 9 May 2015, Alan Calder wrote:
> In article ,
>Roger Darlington wrote:
>> On 8 May 2015, Bernard Boase wrote:
>>> On 8 May, li...@torrens.org.uk typed:
Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
>>> One suggestion would be to use https:
On 9 May 2015, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> In article <3145b6c054.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
>Roger Darlington wrote:
>> On 8 May 2015, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
>>> Another way of using Google is, for example
>>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?&q=Acacia
>>> Just double click o
In message <54c0f71aa9li...@torrens.org.uk>
"Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote:
[snip]
>
>
> Sorry, I've confused myself by togling JS once too many times.
>
> The search script on my www site does work with JF off: Relevant bit is
>
>
>
> http://www.google.com/custom>
>
>
>
>
>
In article ,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> On 8 May 2015, Bernard Boase wrote:
> > On 8 May, li...@torrens.org.uk typed:
> >> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> >> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> > One suggestion would be to use https://startpage.com instead.
[Snip]
> It g
On 9 May 2015 Harriet Bazley [mailto:
li...@orange.wingsandbeaks.org.uk] wrote:
> The only contact details I could find was tweeting @google - looks as if
> they do respond to individual mentions on Twitter, though it mostly seems to
> be people complaining about disappearing Google+ accounts.
In article <60f3f4c054.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> I found a writable icon and wrote what I know about their broken code
> in it (which is nothing at all apart from what someone said on here).
I have used the Send feedback link on the bottom of a search page to s
In article <3145b6c054.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> On 8 May 2015, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> > Another way of using Google is, for example
> > http://www.google.co.uk/search?&q=Acacia
> > Just double click on the link. Works from Pluto, StronEd and anything
On 8 May 2015, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
I have found,on my mobile, an address to write to to tell google about
problems with their search engine.:
https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/6223687?hl=
On 8 May 2015, Bernard Boase wrote:
> On 8 May, li...@torrens.org.uk typed:
>> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> One suggestion would be to use https://startpage.com instead.
But that doesn't work on the fastest Netsurf that I use (r12638)
On 8 May 2015, Frank de Bruijn wrote:
> In article <54c08f864b...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
>> wrote:
>>> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>>> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
>> If you mean Google
On 8 May 2015 as I do recall,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> > Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> >
> > Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> >
>
> It has been reported in the tracker as bug number 2314.
On 8 May 2015 Bernard Boase wrote:
> On 8 May, li...@torrens.org.uk typed:
>> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> One suggestion would be to use https://startpage.com instead.
> It claims to:
> - be the world's most private search engine,
>
In article <9118c3c054.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
[Snip]
> I use Google to provide a search facility on my own web site. Which of
> any of the other search engines or front ends allow you to create a
> form which specifies a particular site?
https://duckduckgo.com/s
On 8 May, li...@torrens.org.uk typed:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
One suggestion would be to use https://startpage.com instead.
It claims to:
- be the world's most private search engine,
- use Google in the background on your behalf any
On 8 May 2015 Frank de Bruijn wrote:
> In article <54c08f864b...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
>> wrote:
>>> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>>> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
>> If you mean Google
On 8 May 2015, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Another way of using Google is, for example
> http://www.google.co.uk/search?&q=Acacia
> Just double click on the link. Works from Pluto, StronEd and anything else
> which will launch a URL.
But that doesn't work on Netsurf :-(
It just oscillates t
Another way of using Google is, for example
http://www.google.co.uk/search?&q=Acacia
Just double click on the link. Works from Pluto, StronEd and anything else
which will launch a URL.
Once on the search, you can delete the search term and type in another.
So it seems to be only from the first p
In article <54c08f864b...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
> wrote:
> > Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> > Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> If you mean Google Search, in its stead I've been using DuckDuck
In message <3d8ea4c054.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore wrote:
> On 8 May 2015, george greenfield
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> So a temporary workaround might be to enable JS, hotlist all
>> regularly-visited/needed sites, then disable JS and avoid using the
>> search page
On 8 May 2015, george greenfield
wrote:
[snip]
> So a temporary workaround might be to enable JS, hotlist all
> regularly-visited/needed sites, then disable JS and avoid using the
> search page entirely.
How is it possible to transfer an address, from the Google search page,
to the NetSurf hotl
In message
Tony Moore wrote:
> On 8 May 2015, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Which version of NetSurf are we talking about here? I'm on 3.4 (Dev
>> CI #2771) on RO 5.22 and haven't seen any problems with Google.
>
> Try tuning off JavaScript.
>
> Tony
With JS off, accessin
In message
on 8 May 2015 Tony Moore wrote:
> On 8 May 2015, Andrew Pinder wrote:
> [snip]
>> Which version of NetSurf are we talking about here? I'm on 3.4 (Dev
>> CI #2771) on RO 5.22 and haven't seen any problems with Google.
> Try tuning off JavaScript.
Sorry, I wasnt paying enough att
On 8 May 2015, Andrew Pinder wrote:
[snip]
> Which version of NetSurf are we talking about here? I'm on 3.4 (Dev
> CI #2771) on RO 5.22 and haven't seen any problems with Google.
Try tuning off JavaScript.
Tony
In message <20150508125407.ga2...@kyllikki.org>
on 8 May 2015 Vincent Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
>> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>>
>> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
>>
> It has been reported in the tracker
In article <20150508125407.ga2...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> It has been reported in the tracker as bug number 2314. Google have
> changed the non javascript portion of their reply (the noscript entry)
> to comtain completely broken html that simply causes the browser to
> refresh
In article <54c08ebfb1joh...@ukgateway.net>,
John Williams wrote:
> Or one of those "record your button presses and menu items" programs we
> used to have in the olden days.
It's called KeyStroke, Alisdair Jørgensen, originally sold by Quantum
software, now PD. It could indeed record such a t
In article <20150508125407.ga2...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> > Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> >
> > Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
> >
[Snip]
> We cannot do anything about this in
In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>, Richard Torrens (lists)
wrote:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
If you mean Google Search, in its stead I've been using DuckDuckGo with
RISC OS for some time.
https://duckduckgo.com/html/
--
w
On 8 May 2015 Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
I think it's absolutely essential that we have a javascript on/off
button on the toolbar. If javescript is off google won't work and if
it's on streetmap.co.uk w
In article <54c08c6513li...@torrens.org.uk>,
Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
It still works if you put JS on - but, of course, that bu**ers up StreetMap.
Now more than ever we need that magic JS ON/JS OFF
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Yesterday Google stopped working with Netsurf.
>
> Has anyone any cures or suggestions?
>
It has been reported in the tracker as bug number 2314. Google have
changed the non javascript portion of their reply (the noscript
On 31 Mar 2015, Harriet Bazley wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2015 as I do recall,
> Roger Darlington wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2015, Harriet Bazley wrote:
> [snip]
>>> For example, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VL5wUgW0RssC&pg=PA24
>>> The intended display is hidden as
>>
>>> .viewport div img
On 31 Mar 2015 as I do recall,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2015, Harriet Bazley wrote:
[snip]
> > For example, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VL5wUgW0RssC&pg=PA24
> > The intended display is hidden as
>
> > .viewport div img {display:none;}
> >
> > .html_page_image {
>
On 18 Feb 2015, Harriet Bazley wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2015 as I do recall,
> Roger Darlington wrote:
>>
>> I suppose someone knows that Google Books does not show the pages any
>> longer in any version of Netsurf I have. One 2 years old, NS 3.2, and
>> a test build from today.
>>
>> It use
In article ,
Roger Darlington wrote:
> You wouldn't have thought Google would have changed the code so that
> it doesn't actually do anything on Netsurf now - didn't they donate
> some money to Netsurf once? Perhaps its time for them to now donate
> some code for it that enables it to read
On 17 Feb 2015 as I do recall,
Roger Darlington wrote:
>
> I suppose someone knows that Google Books does not show the pages any
> longer in any version of Netsurf I have. One 2 years old, NS 3.2, and
> a test build from today.
>
> It used to work fine, but Google must have put some spa
David Pitt, on 2 Jun, wrote:
> Alan Calder, on 2 Jun, wrote:
>
> > In article , David Pitt
> > wrote:
> > > Cristopher Dewhurst, on 2 Jun, wrote:
> >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Using Netsurf v1940, seems to be ok here (Raspberry Pi RISC OS 5.21)
> > > > Maybe a temporary glitch with Google, or
Alan Calder, on 2 Jun, wrote:
> In article , David Pitt
> wrote:
> > Cristopher Dewhurst, on 2 Jun, wrote:
>
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Using Netsurf v1940, seems to be ok here (Raspberry Pi RISC OS 5.21)
> > > Maybe a temporary glitch with Google, or perhaps something fixed in NS
> > > between 1932
In article , David Pitt
wrote:
> Cristopher Dewhurst, on 2 Jun, wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Using Netsurf v1940, seems to be ok here (Raspberry Pi RISC OS 5.21)
> > Maybe a temporary glitch with Google, or perhaps something fixed in NS
> > between 1932 and 1940?
> 1940 still hangs here.
Don't know a
Cristopher Dewhurst, on 2 Jun, wrote:
> Hi
>
> Using Netsurf v1940, seems to be ok here (Raspberry Pi RISC OS 5.21) Maybe
> a temporary glitch with Google, or perhaps something fixed in NS between
> 1932 and 1940?
1940 still hangs here.
>
> Chris
>
> In message <7f015b1154.harr...@blueyonder.
Hi
Using Netsurf v1940, seems to be ok here (Raspberry Pi RISC OS 5.21)
Maybe a temporary glitch with Google, or perhaps something fixed in NS
between 1932 and 1940?
Chris
In message <7f015b1154.harr...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> Of recent weeks I've increasingly foun
On 2 Jun, Richard Porter wrote:
> I haven't noticed any particular problems with it.
Same here - been working fine - currently on #1940 on Iyonix RO 5.20
with JS on.
--
Brian Howlett
-
People who live in glass houses should undress in
In message
David Pitt wrote:
>David Pitt, on 2 Jun, wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>> I will dig a bit more.
>
>Bug 2136 now submitted.
>
>
Thanks for submitting the bug. Something I hadn't got round to doing as
I thought it might have been just me that was suffering from this
effect.
Regards,
-
David Pitt, on 2 Jun, wrote:
[snip]
> I will dig a bit more.
Bug 2136 now submitted.
--
David Pitt
On 2 Jun 2014 Harriet Bazley wrote:
> Of recent weeks I've increasingly found that Google searches are not
> rendering in Netsurf, especially when you try to view a second or
> subsequent page of search results: the window just hangs there with the
> progress indicator moving instead of the usual
Peter Young, on 2 Jun, wrote:
> On 2 Jun 2014 David Pitt wrote:
>
> > Harriet Bazley, on 2 Jun, wrote:
>
> > > Of recent weeks I've increasingly found that Google searches are not
> > > rendering in Netsurf, especially when you try to view a second or
> > > subsequent page of search results: t
On 2 Jun 2014 David Pitt wrote:
> Harriet Bazley, on 2 Jun, wrote:
>> Of recent weeks I've increasingly found that Google searches are not
>> rendering in Netsurf, especially when you try to view a second or
>> subsequent page of search results: the window just hangs there with the
>> progress
Harriet Bazley, on 2 Jun, wrote:
> Of recent weeks I've increasingly found that Google searches are not
> rendering in Netsurf, especially when you try to view a second or
> subsequent page of search results: the window just hangs there with the
> progress indicator moving instead of the usual alm
In message <7f015b1154.harr...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Harriet Bazley wrote:
>Of recent weeks I've increasingly found that Google searches are not
>rendering in Netsurf, especially when you try to view a second or
>subsequent page of search results: the window just hangs there with the
>progr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I've noticed the same, thought it was just me
Cheers
Malcolm
On Jun 2, 2014, Harriet Bazley wrote:
>Of recent weeks I've increasingly found that Google searches are not
>rendering in Netsurf, especially when you try to view a second or
>subsequent
In article <7f015b1154.harr...@blueyonder.co.uk>,
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing this, or is it my ISP?
> (Netsurf v1932, JS disabled)
I was experiencing it yesterday with 1929/1930, JS disabled. Plusnet.
Thought it was just me!
John
--
| John Williams
| joh..
In message
Tony Moore wrote:
>On 30 Apr 2014, Graham Pickles wrote:
>
>> Recently I have had problem on my laptop using Google to search for
>> items. The problem appears to be intermittent. I enter the search
>> criteria into Google and Netsurf indicates 'Fetching, Fetching,
>> Proc
On 30 Apr 2014, Graham Pickles wrote:
> Recently I have had problem on my laptop using Google to search for
> items. The problem appears to be intermittent. I enter the search
> criteria into Google and Netsurf indicates 'Fetching, Fetching,
> Processing' but goes no further (i.e. message remain
On 24 Feb 2014, John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> For the past several years I have used NetSurf for finding images on
> the web via Google Images search.
>
> Google puts up a page of images for the search term. Then a click on
> an image used to bring up a web page with an option to see the impage
>
In message
Allan Bennett wrote:
> There is a "Tell us how we're doing" feedback button - very quick to
> complete, though I don't know how much notice they will take...
I took a screenshot, transferred it to a PC, posted it and submitted
feedback, highlighting the screenshot.
--
Je
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:55:32 +0100, John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> I am trying to find a cloud based application for sharing files across
> several systems.
>
> These are: Iyonix RISC OS, HTC phone Android, 10" Tablet Android,
> Raspberry Pi linux and RISC OS, and an Intel machine running Lubuntu
Jess Hampshire wrote
> John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>> Is this a good case for faking the User-Agent string?
> Possibly a good case for dismissing Google plus as an irrelevance.
> Facebook can be used with NS
I am trying to find a cloud based application for sharing files across
seve
In message
John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> Is this a good case for faking the User-Agent string?
Possibly a good case for dismissing Google plus as an irrelevance.
Facebook can be used with NS
--
Jess
In message
John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> A web page with the subject message appears when I try to access
> Google+ from NetSurf.
> https://plus.google.com/
> Clicking on learn more the next page says:
> Google+ is supported in the following browsers:
> Windows: Chrome, Firefox 3.6
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:56:54AM +0100, John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> A web page with the subject message appears when I try to access
> Google+ from NetSurf.
> https://plus.google.com/
> Clicking on learn more the next page says:
>
> Google+ is supported in the following browsers:
> Windows
To: netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
Subject: Re: google custom search using Netsurf v2.7
In article <277c4e0a52.michaelb...@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>, Michael
Bell wrote:
> In message <520a42849bt...@netsurf-browser.org> Michael Drake
>wrot
In article <277c4e0a52.michaelb...@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>, Michael
Bell wrote:
> In message <520a42849bt...@netsurf-browser.org> Michael Drake
>wrote:
> > In article
> > <5b13461198a73e4181c24862591b2b7776b...@ch1prd0102mb121.prod.exchangel
> > abs.com>, Mr Robin Lawrence wrote:
On 29 Aug 2011 Michael Bell wrote:
> In message <520a42849bt...@netsurf-browser.org>
> Michael Drake wrote:
>> In article
>> <5b13461198a73e4181c24862591b2b7776b...@ch1prd0102mb121.prod.exchangel
>> abs.com>,
>>Mr Robin Lawrence wrote:
>>> Hi there I haven't used my Iyonix for
In message <520a42849bt...@netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake wrote:
> In article
> <5b13461198a73e4181c24862591b2b7776b...@ch1prd0102mb121.prod.exchangel
> abs.com>,
>Mr Robin Lawrence wrote:
>> Hi there I haven't used my Iyonix for a while and today I tried to use
>> Netsurf v2.
In article
<5b13461198a73e4181c24862591b2b7776b...@ch1prd0102mb121.prod.exchangelabs.com>,
Mr Robin Lawrence wrote:
> Hi there I haven't used my Iyonix for a while and today I tried to use
> Netsurf v2.7 with google custom search and I got the message about
> Java.. I looked at google
On 28 Jul 2011, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:18:39AM +0100, Roger Darlington wrote:
>>
>> Using Netsurf, r12629, but also tried a different one, when entering
>> any text in the Google Search box, I get:
>>
>>
>> ""
>> 403 Thats an error.
>>
>> Your client does not have pe
On 28 Jul 2011, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:18:39AM +0100, Roger Darlington wrote:
>>
>> Using Netsurf, r12629, but also tried a different one, when entering
>> any text in the Google Search box, I get:
>>
>>
>> ""
>> 403 Thats an error.
>>
>> Your client does not have pe
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
