Re: Odd behaviour ?

2008-10-29 Thread Frank de Bruijn
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Torrens (lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How come, if the domain name is illegal, it has been accepted for > registration? It isn't illegal. The restriction that the first character of a host name cannot be a digit was removed years ago. See RFC 1123, section

Re: Odd behaviour ?

2008-10-29 Thread Tim Hill
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:41:24 + (GMT) Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Snip] > If you didn't want me to reply here, you should have sent your message > to me, and not the list. Merely my polite way of saying 'this i

Re: Odd behaviour ?

2008-10-29 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:41:24 + (GMT) Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How come, if the domain name is illegal, it has been accepted for > > > registration? I did a whois on it. > > Because registrars are lax. Hostname segments should not begin with > > digits, and this makes it diffi

Re: Odd behaviour ?

2008-10-29 Thread Tim Hill
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:53:28 + (GMT) "Torrens (lists)" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How come, if the domain name is illegal, it has been accepted for > > registration? I did a whois on it. > Because registrars are l

Re: Odd behaviour ?

2008-10-29 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:53:28 + (GMT) "Torrens (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How come, if the domain name is illegal, it has been accepted for > registration? I did a whois on it. Because registrars are lax. Hostname segments should not begin with digits, and this makes it difficult t

Re: Odd behaviour ?

2008-10-29 Thread Torrens (lists)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:49:34 + (GMT) > "Torrens (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Netsurf 2.0 (Dev) (21 Oct 2008 18:15) r5612 > > > > http://0404.co.uk/ behaves most oddly. > > > > It seems to be the html line

Re: Odd behaviour ?

2008-10-29 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:49:34 + (GMT) "Torrens (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Netsurf 2.0 (Dev) (21 Oct 2008 18:15) r5612 > > http://0404.co.uk/ behaves most oddly. > > It seems to be the html line > http://0404.co.uk/";> > that is causing this... Aside from the illegality of the

Odd behaviour ?

2008-10-29 Thread Torrens (lists)
Netsurf 2.0 (Dev) (21 Oct 2008 18:15) r5612 http://0404.co.uk/ behaves most oddly. It seems to be the html line http://0404.co.uk/";> that is causing this...