Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread John Williams
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try subscribing to cia.navi.cx/stats/project/NetSurf/.rss A useful suggestion - but: It involves having Ticker being constantly loaded or invoked. The current message bears today's date - but lists (today

Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 11 Nov 2007 Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11 Nov 2007, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:01 +, John Williams wrote: >> >>> I have experienced difficulties finding out about new builds because >>> (presumably) my ISP (NTL) caches pages. The mor

Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread Tony Moore
On 11 Nov 2007, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:01 +, John Williams wrote: > > > I have experienced difficulties finding out about new builds because > > (presumably) my ISP (NTL) caches pages. The more often I check, the > > less likely, it seems, to find the

Re: Anomaly, feature - or bug?

2007-11-11 Thread Richard Porter
On 11 Nov 2007 Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:59 +, Richard Torrens (RiscOS) wrote: >>> I presume the original poster was referring to viewing said pages in an >>> offline mode, whereby the SSIs won't be executed and NetSurf will see the >>> 'raw', original HTML code? >> >> C

Re: Anomaly, feature - or bug?

2007-11-11 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:59 +, Richard Torrens (RiscOS) wrote: > > I presume the original poster was referring to viewing said pages in an > > offline mode, whereby the SSIs won't be executed and NetSurf will see the > > 'raw', original HTML code? > > Correct. > > But my feeling is that log

Re: Anomaly, feature - or bug?

2007-11-11 Thread Richard Torrens (RiscOS)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Richard Torrens (RiscOS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> muttered: > > Server Side Includes... > But they're handled by the server, so if the server is working > correctly, the b

Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread John Williams
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There have been no builds since the 5th of November. Additionally, NTL > no longer transparently proxy and cache its users. What date are you > seeing on the page? I see that one fine, it was previous versions, and par

Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:01 +, John Williams wrote: > I have experienced difficulties finding out about new builds because > (presumably) my ISP (NTL) caches pages. The more often I check, the less > likely, it seems, to find them! > > Could the Builds page (http://www.netsurf-browser.org/bui

New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread John Williams
I have experienced difficulties finding out about new builds because (presumably) my ISP (NTL) caches pages. The more often I check, the less likely, it seems, to find them! Could the Builds page (http://www.netsurf-browser.org/builds/) have something in its header to prevent this, please? I do

Re: Anomaly, feature - or bug?

2007-11-11 Thread Richard Porter
On 11 Nov 2007 Paul Vigay wrote: > In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Richard Torrens (RiscOS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> muttered: >> Server Side Includes... > But they're handled by the server, so if the server is working correctly, > the browser won't actually see the original c

Re: Anomaly, feature - or bug?

2007-11-11 Thread Paul Vigay
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Torrens (RiscOS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> muttered: > Server Side Includes... But they're handled by the server, so if the server is working correctly, the browser won't actually see the original code, merely the HTML that the server sends