On 5 Oct 2007 Jess Hampshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You mean open up the tiny fraction of sites which provide an
> The question is how tiny that fraction is. And how many are useful
> sites we are norm
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean open up the tiny fraction of sites which provide an
The question is how tiny that fraction is. And how many are useful
sites we are normally locked out of either by lack of plug-ins,
javascript or pro
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:46 +0100, Jess Hampshire wrote:
>> Would making Netsurf able to function as a WAP / WML browser be a
>> major task?
>>
>> Many heavy duty websites provide WML alternatives for use with m
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:46 +0100, Jess Hampshire wrote:
> Would making Netsurf able to function as a WAP / WML browser be a
> major task?
>
> Many heavy duty websites provide WML alternatives for use with mobile
> phones (without javascript).
Are there still that many WAP sites out there? Mo
On 5 Oct 2007 Jess Hampshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would making Netsurf able to function as a WAP / WML browser be a
> major task?
> Many heavy duty websites provide WML alternatives for use with mobile
> phones (without javascript).
> Since many RISC OS machines are more similar processin
Would making Netsurf able to function as a WAP / WML browser be a
major task?
Many heavy duty websites provide WML alternatives for use with mobile
phones (without javascript).
Since many RISC OS machines are more similar processing power to
mobile phones than typical desktop PCs and many site
