In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean open up the tiny fraction of sites which provide an
The question is how tiny that fraction is. And how many are useful
sites we are normally locked out of either by lack of plug-ins,
javascript or processor power?
> alternative excrutingly poor WAP experiance aimed at phones screens
> 1/100th the resolution I'm using on my 22" monitor?
But with a similar processor power to a Risc PC.
> While it might be useful to have WML capability for authors to test
> WAP sites, as alternative to the web it is not worth persuing.
I think it depends on how much work it is.
--
Jess Iyonix
contact http://jess.itworkshop-nexus.net
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
