Review: Needs Information netstack-core
Great work on this changelist Salvatore! This was much needed. I do have a few
questions, while not directly related to this branch, they did bring up
questions in my mind around our official API Spec? I felt the Error codes
weren't correct and looking at
bove mentioned bug in order to make sure relevant
> adjustments, both in code and specification are agreed and applied as soon
> as possible.
>
> ** **
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,
>
> Salvatore
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://lau
rect, and then start a discussion around fixing the API, as I mentioned
> at the end of today's meeting.
>
> What's your opinion? Should we first sync code and spec and then merge unit
> tests. Alternatively we could sync the unit tests alone with the API spec,
> and merge them.
Review: Approve netstack-core
Great work Salvatore! We are getting there. I am approving this for merge to
trunk as this branch is definitely a step in the right direction.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~netstack/quantum/quantum-unit-tests/+merge/68308
Your team Netstack is subscribed to branch
The proposal to merge lp:~netstack/quantum/quantum-unit-tests into lp:quantum
has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~netstack/quantum/quantum-unit-tests/+merge/68308
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~netstack/quantum/quantum-unit-t
s.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Santhosh
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~
> Dan Wendlandt
> Nicira Networks,
; receive your feedback.
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,
>
> Salvatore
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com]
> *Sent:* 30 July 2011 04:04
> *To:* Somik Behera
> *Cc:* Salvatore Orlando; Santhosh Kumar M; netstack@lists.launchpad.net
>
/bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/813433
>
> ** **
>
> I agree with Somik that we can start merging the unit tests branch, as long
> as no other concern emerges from the review currently in progress.
>
> ** **
>
> Salvatore
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Somik Be
Thanks Salvatore!
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Salvatore Orlando <
salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi Somik,
>
> ** **
>
> Please see my replies inline.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Somik Behera [mailto:so...@nicira.com]
> *Sent:* 05 August 20
e grayed out based on the operation the user is
allowed to perform, delete operation on already attached port will detach
and then delete the port automagically.
Otherwise, I am looking forward to the dashboard stuff completing soon!
Thanks,
Somik
--
Somik Behera | Nicira Networks, Inc. | so..
s.
>
> Thanks
> Arvind
>
> --
> Mailing list:
> https://launchpad.net/~**netstack<https://launchpad.net/%7Enetstack>
> Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe :
> https://launchpad.net/~**netstack<https://launchpad.net/%7Enetstack>
> More hel
The embedded image was garbled, so I have attached a link to the image.
Somik
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Somik Behera wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I spent some time on and offline with Nova, Swift & Keystone PTLs
> understanding current Keystone use-cases and championing
gt; model.
>
> 3. Quantum API v1.1
>
> a. Synchronous vs Asynchronous behaviour and concept of “Operational
> Status”
>
> b. Improvements such as Filtering, Rate Limiting, Resource Links,
> pagination
>
> 4. Cloud Bridgi
discussion or do a unconference session as having a robust UI will
definitely help Quantum's adoption as well as Demo's :)
Thanks,
Somik
--
Somik Behera | Nicira Networks, Inc. | so...@nicira.com |
office: 650-390-6790 | cell: 512-577-6645
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net
define the agenda of the
>> session.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Salvatore
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* netstack-bounces+salvatore.orlando=
>> eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:
>> netstack-bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.la
nformation from Nova - 10 min
Please do let me know, if there are additional points of discussion around
integration workflows, and I'll attempt
to ensure those topic get adequate discussion time coverage.
Thanks,
Somik
--
Somik Behera | Nicira Networks, Inc. | so...@nicira.com |
office:
Hello All,
Here's the etherpad with tasks based on today's workflow and UI requests for
Essex release. The next step is to create blueprints for the tasks and find
owners for blueprints.
Etherpad - http://etherpad.openstack.org/quantum-essex-workflow-ui
Thanks,
Somik
--
Somik Beher
nchpad.net/~netstack
> Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
--
Somik Behera | Nicira Networks, Inc. | so...@nicira.com |
office: 650-390-6790 | cell: 512-577-6645
--
Mailing lis
onality, please come
forward and volunteer!
Here are wireframe references of the upcoming Essex Dashboard release -
http://www.slideshare.net/PaulTashima/openstack-dashboard-wireframes-20110928
Thanks,
Somik
--
Somik Behera | Nicira Networks, Inc. | so...@nicira.com |
office: 650-390-6790 | cel
I use the trunk version of Keystone.
>
> Thanks,
> Doude.
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Somik Behera wrote:
> > Hi Doude,
> >
> > Keystone will be merged back with additional enhancements to ensure that
> > Quantum and Keystone are usable out of th
/authorization-support-for-quantum
Design wiki -- http://wiki.openstack.org/QuantumAuthZ
Thanks,
Somik
--
Somik Behera | Nicira Networks, Inc. | so...@nicira.com |
office: 650-390-6790 | cell: 512-577-6645
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Public bug reported:
As per our public Quantum 1.0 API specification, our success return
codes on create call is HTTP 200 OK
Reference - http://docs.openstack.org/incubation/openstack-
network/developer/quantum-api-1.0/quantum-api-guide-trunk.pdf
Current Behavior:
The success code is hard-coded
22 matches
Mail list logo