There is a test framework.. it's tox (take a look at tox.ini). To run the
tests use tox -v:
$ tox -v
...
Ran 148 tests in 1.379s
Thanks,
Brad
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Deepak Garg wrote:
> I think the test framework should be very close to other openstack
> projects and hence you may si
Yeah, I think its fine to delete the check. Feel free to remove the check
in your environment and reply back if anything else breaks -- I'll also
submit a nova patch for it.
Thanks,
Brad
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 11:51 AM, David Lapsley wrote:
> > On
+1 for all three of them from me too
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:44 PM, hitesh wadekar wrote:
> It's my pleasure to work with you all.
>
> +1 for all,
>
> Thanks,
> Hitesh Wadekar
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Ram Durairaj (radurair) <
> radur...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot Bob, Ma
Also, make sure to remove any normal bridges (br100 and virbr0) prior
to installing the openvswitch packages.
Thanks,
Brad
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Jason Kölker wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:17 -0700, hitesh wadekar wrote:
>> I am sure somebody would have already been come across th
27;, u'affect_auto_assigned': False}, u'_context_auth_token':
> u'685a55a68baf4e1ea311a5b2ff3c5b89', u'_context_strategy': u'keystone',
> u'_context_is_admin': False, u'_context_project_id':
> u'5b5a2c42b5874058962c6f543
Another thing to check .. when I run devstack by default my network
doesn't get associated with a host [host is NULL in the database].
Make sure the host for that network is set to the hostname of the
compute node.
Thanks,
Brad
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Brad Hall wrote:
> Can y
6 172.241.1.2
> ERROR: Associate floating ip failed (HTTP 500)
>
> So validation is happening.
>
> Thanks,
> Darragh.
>
>
> From: Brad Hall
> To: Darragh OReilly
> Cc: "netstack@lists.launchpad.net"
> Sent: Monday, 27 Feb
Hi Darragh,
Try passing in the instance id of the vm (or the uuid).. it sounds
like its failing to figure out what instance you mean to associate
with.
Thanks,
Brad
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Darragh OReilly
wrote:
>
>
> When I try to associate a floating IP from the dash I get:
> Error:
Hi Yapeng,
There is probably bug where ovs is only installed if "quantum" is
specified in enabled_services -- I'll take a look at it today.
Thanks,
Brad
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Yapeng Wu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't know if anyone tried to use devstack to test out the multi-node
> setup
I still vote for #2. I don't think there will be a ton of duplication so we're
probably ok in that regard. Also, it sounds like following suit will make life
easier for the ci folks. I think #3 will be painful (both in initial work and
maintenance).
If we do #2 then we could put quantum-clie
Hi Andy,
I'll take a look at this and get back to you.
Thanks,
Brad
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am not able to get lp:nova and lp:quantum to work together, even with the
> FakePlugin.
>
> (euca-run-instances fails. Using standard libvirt settings except
>
t that you are now planning to collapse the separate
> setup_*.py files into a single setup.py. Does this mean you've completely
> given up on structuring quantum into separately packaged common, client,
> server, and *_plugin components? If not, how will it work?
>
> -Bob
>
>
Hey Robert,
Good catch! I'll file a bug to move the extensions to the cisco
plugin directory.
Thanks,
Brad
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Robert Kukura wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 07:07 PM, Brad Hall wrote:
>>
>> OK, the changes are in. The directory tree is now back to
OK, the changes are in. The directory tree is now back to the old
structure which should make life easier for the distros for packaging.
Thanks,Brad
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Brad Hall wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.. Here is a review for the changes:
> https://review.opensta
can be easy solved using a --build-base
>> parameter for each one, but it's not as straight as in "python setup_xX.py
>> install"
>> Ghe Rivero
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:28 AM, ghe. rivero wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow! That was quick! I&#x
Thanks for the feedback.. Here is a review for the changes:
https://review.openstack.org/#change,1886
Thanks,
Brad
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Dan Wendlandt (d...@nicira.com) wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:03 PM, ghe. rivero wrote:
>> > Absolutly. I only hope t
Hi Chris,
Glad to see the packaging is in place for the diablo Quantum release
-- that's fantastic.
As for the directory structure, I agree that the current layout is
cumbersome. The reason it was done was for ease of packaging; but if
the distros are going to package it using spec/deb files any
Thanks for triaging this. I added distribute==0.6.24 to tools/pip
requires so hopefully others won't run into this.
Thanks,
Brad
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Salvatore Orlando
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> After pulling from quantum master I saw run_tests.sh was only running the
> tests in client.li
unces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net
> [mailto:netstack-bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net]
> On Behalf Of Dan Wendlandt
> Sent: 19 October 2011 01:01
> To: Brad Hall
> Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Netstack] Changing the upd
Per the discussion on IRC I'm sending out a mail to clarify the work
that needs to be done (short-term) for nova networking parity.
The general idea is that the functionality already exists in nova
(aside from pieces related to Melange integration) so we might as well
leverage it in the short term
Yeah, I think it sounds useful.
Thanks,
Brad
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Salvatore Orlando
wrote:
> Is this something we might consider for Quantum as well as concerns resource
> extensions?
>
> Salvatore
>
> -Original Message-
> From: openstack-bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix.
Hey Everyone,
Since the change to make the create() calls take a parameter of k/v
pairs has gotten approval I wanted to propose a change to make the
update calls do the same. The review is here:
https://review.openstack.org/#change,929 .. I've posted this review in
order to get feedback and to ha
+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
>> Brad Hall
>> Sent: 18 October 2011 07:11
>> To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net
>> Subject: [Netstack] Code coverage status
>>
>> Hey Everyone,
>>
>> After this change goes in (https://rev
2011 at 11:15 PM, Edgar Magana (eperdomo)
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>> Good job here... I already +1
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
>> [mailto:netstack-bou
Hey Everyone,
After this change goes in (https://review.openstack.org/#change,677
[1]), you'll be able to generate code coverage numbers for our tests
by using run_tests.sh -c. We're actually doing fairly good so far
(sorry, gmail screws up the font):
NameStmts Mis
Hey Netstackers,
I've got some outstanding reviews that could use another +1 please :)
https://review.openstack.org/#change,839
https://review.openstack.org/#change,835
https://review.openstack.org/#change,677
https://review.openstack.org/#change,666
Thanks,
Brad
--
Mailing list: https://launc
I haven't read the entire proposal yet but I wanted to clarify
something quickly (inline)..
Thanks,
Brad
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Salvatore Orlando
wrote:
> Hi Sumit,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> First of all please keep in mind that the wiki page started with the
> following di
As the first one to completely mess this up (I clicked approve on a
review (+2) when there wasn't a (+1) yet) I figured I'd send out a
link describing the protocol in case anyone other than me missed this
in the documentation.
>From http://wiki.openstack.org/GerritJenkinsGithub:
Any Openstack dev
in
> the vendors Plugins.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Edgar
>
> -Original Message-
> From: netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
> [mailto:netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
> Brad Hall
> Sent: Tuesday, Octob
y for a plugin to register any extra params it
would like to take..)
> Salvatore
Thanks for taking a look!
-Brad
>> -Original Message-
>> From: netstack-
>> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net
>> [mailto:netstack-
>> bounces+salva
Ping :) Reviews/comments appreciated.
Thanks,
Brad
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Brad Hall wrote:
> I've created a branch to address this here:
> https://review.openstack.org/#change,665
>
> Currently I've only add param dicts to the create calls but maybe it
> mak
Hey Tyler,
Replies inline..
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Tyler Smith wrote:
> Comments inline:
>
>> I kind of liked having everything in one directory before
>> (quantum/...) and that's the way that nova does it but I see how the
>> way you've split it makes it easier for packaging. Not a bi
Oops, ignore the thw -> the comment.. there is a quantumcore package
on pypi that I mistakenly thought was ours :)
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Brad Hall wrote:
> Thanks again for al the work on this Tyler. It seems to be getting
> closer and I'm looking forward to having thi
Thanks again for al the work on this Tyler. It seems to be getting
closer and I'm looking forward to having this all packaged so that
distribution is easier. Comments inline..
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Tyler Smith wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've gotten the packaging issues we discussed t
Hey All,
As discussed in the irc meeting today the way to be notified of any
new reviews is to add yourself as a watcher to the project in gerrit.
The page for that is here:
https://review.openstack.org/#settings,projects .. and for the project
enter "openstack/quantum" then click the check boxes
param structure, eg. (key, value) pair. We actually
> proposed this earlier as it makes extension much easier.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Best,
> Ying
>
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: netstack-bounces+yinliu2=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
>&g
I created a review for this based on when the branch got imported to
github: https://review.openstack.org/#change,655. I'm not sure what
the process is supposed to be for this so I just did it manually.
Please sanity check the review if you've had changes merged into the
diablo branch in the past
Hey Dan,
Replies below..
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Brad Hall wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > o QuantumManager.allocate_for_instance was failing because the JSON
>> > response from Quantum
Hey Salvatore,
Replies inline..
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Salvatore Orlando
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have installed an Openstack testbed with Quantum (OVS Plugin) and standard
> nova IPAM. Hypervisor backend is XenServer.
Thanks for trying it out.. sorry that you ran into issues.
>
> Alth
Hello Netstackers,
I've been working with the extensions framework lately and wanted to
know how data extensions are supposed to work. What I want to do is
something like this:
A hypothetical device that I'm writing a plugin for has a property on
the port called "foo" and I want to be able to cr
And we're migrated! Thanks to James Blair for taking care of it.
Please read the workflow link below and get your environments set up.
If you have any questions/issues send them to the mailing list and
we'll figure it out.
Thanks,
Brad
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Brad H
Reminder: this is happening tomorrow morning! I'll send another email
when it's done..
Thanks,
Brad
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Brad Hall wrote:
> Hey everyone..
>
> I just wanted to send a heads up based on the IRC meeting this week
> that we'll be moving to
Hey everyone..
I just wanted to send a heads up based on the IRC meeting this week
that we'll be moving to github friday (9/16) at 9am-ish PST. If there
is any big concerns please raise them now before it's too late :) For
any setup questions or hurdles please send them to the list so that
other
Hey Tyler,
As a general comment: It feels like we're diverging quite a bit from
the way that the nova directory tree is set up. Are we sure that we
want to do that? My vote is to keep it similar so that it is more
familiar to someone who has previously worked on or used nova.
A couple of commen
Hey Tyler,
Thanks for pushing this.. I'll try it out today and send feedback.
Thanks,
Brad
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Tyler Smith wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I just pushed the plugin changes. The bzr repo is intact; I used bzr mv/cp,
> etc. Merging changes isn't a walk in the park, but it's no
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~netstack/quantum/quantum-unit-tests/+merge/68308
Your team Netstack is subscribed to branch
lp:~netstack/quantum/quantum-unit-tests.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://
This looks great so far. I haven't done a thorough review of the code
but from a quick initial inspection it looks like the direction we
want to go. It certainly makes the tests a lot cleaner :)
Thanks for doing this!
-Brad
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Tyler Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have
47 matches
Mail list logo
