On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:20:22PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Hmm, I'm still confused...
>
> Dan
Don't worry, you are not the only one being confused...
Anyway, I made some decisions, for a change ;-) Wireless
Extensions 21 will be the big switch over when ESSID length are t
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:07 -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:33:00AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > Jean,
> >
> > You mean it would be wise to _not_ commit this patch, right?
>
> Yeah, it depend which way you look at it. I was talking of the
> reverse patch ;-
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:33:00AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Jean,
>
> You mean it would be wise to _not_ commit this patch, right?
Yeah, it depend which way you look at it. I was talking of the
reverse patch ;-)
> John: if that's the case (and I think it is?), please back that pat
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:18 -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:06:33PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:28:43PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:28:44PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'll post a revert
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:06:33PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:28:43PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:28:44PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll post a revert patch for the patch I originally sent so that we go
> > > back to th
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:28:43PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:28:44PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > I'll post a revert patch for the patch I originally sent so that we go
> > back to the original behavior.
>
> Sorry, I may have overreacted. I think that'
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:13:16AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:01:44PM -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> It is spelled very clearly on my web site :
> ---
> # The HostAP driver is the reference implementat
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:28:44PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> I'll post a revert patch for the patch I originally sent so that we go
> back to the original behavior.
Sorry, I may have overreacted. I think that's a worthwhile
change, let's just plan it properly.
> Dan
Jean
-
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:13 -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:01:44PM -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > > ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
> > > adjusting the length o
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:01:44PM -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
> > adjusting the length of the ESSID before reporting it in their
> > SIOCGIWESSID handlers.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 11:07:10AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 17:01 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> 1) The patch preserves the null-termination of the ESSID, it just
> doesn't return the expanded length to acco
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 17:01 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
> > adjusting the length of the ESSID before reporting it in their
> > SIOCGIWESSID handlers. Breaks
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
> adjusting the length of the ESSID before reporting it in their
> SIOCGIWESSID handlers. Breaks stuff like wpa_supplicant. Note that ipw
> drivers, which seem t
Hi,
ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
adjusting the length of the ESSID before reporting it in their
SIOCGIWESSID handlers. Breaks stuff like wpa_supplicant. Note that ipw
drivers, which seem to currently be the "most correct", don't have this
problem.
Signe
14 matches
Mail list logo
