On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:18 -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:06:33PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:28:43PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:28:44PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > > > > I'll post a revert patch for the patch I originally sent so that we go > > > > back to the original behavior. > > > > > > Sorry, I may have overreacted. I think that's a worthwhile > > > change, let's just plan it properly. > > > > Is this resolved? Does Dan still need to send a patch? > > > > John > > I personally think it would be wise to push this patch until > we figure out how we plan to go forward. Somebody will need to > evaluate the impact on userspace apps (list on my web page), and send > a friendly warning to all those developpers.
Jean, You mean it would be wise to _not_ commit this patch, right? John: if that's the case (and I think it is?), please back that patch out... Thanks! Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
