On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 13:00 +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Joe Perches
> > Sent: 06 October 2016 12:39
> > On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 09:41 +, David Laight wrote:
> > > From: Joe Perches
> > > > No worries, and bool is the same ,size as u8.
> > > That is not guaranteed at all.
> > > One of the A
From: Joe Perches
> Sent: 06 October 2016 12:39
> On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 09:41 +, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Joe Perches
> > > No worries, and bool is the same ,size as u8.
> > That is not guaranteed at all.
> > One of the ARM ABI defined bool to be the size of int.
>
> Really? What kernel
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 09:41 +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Joe Perches
> > No worries, and bool is the same ,size as u8.
> That is not guaranteed at all.
> One of the ARM ABI defined bool to be the size of int.
Really? What kernel has sizeof(_Bool) != 1 ?
From: Of Joe Perches
...
> No worries, and bool is the same size as u8.
That is not guaranteed at all.
One of the ARM ABI defined bool to be the size of int.
David
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 09:02 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I believe you are wrong. bit addressability does not matter, cpu can
> > definitely get the bit values.
> >
> > u8 foo:1;
> > u8 bar:1;
> > u8 baz:1;
> >
> > should take 1 byte, where
> >
>
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 09:02 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I believe you are wrong. bit addressability does not matter, cpu can
> definitely get the bit values.
>
> u8 foo:1;
> u8 bar:1;
> u8 baz:1;
>
> should take 1 byte, where
>
> bool foo, bar, baz;
>
> will take more like 3.
Definitely true.
On Wed 2016-10-05 15:28:51, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 00:13 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2016-10-05 12:15:34, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 21:11 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > On Wed 2016-10-05 10:53:16, Joe Perches wrote:
> []
> > > > > trivia:
> > >
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 00:13 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-10-05 12:15:34, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 21:11 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Wed 2016-10-05 10:53:16, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > > > trivia:
> > > > It's generally faster to use bool instead of u8 foo:1;
>
On Wed 2016-10-05 12:15:34, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 21:11 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2016-10-05 10:53:16, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 13:14 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > > > Hi Pavel,
> > > >
> > > > > bluetooth.h is not part of user API, so __
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 21:11 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-10-05 10:53:16, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 13:14 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > > Hi Pavel,
> > >
> > > > bluetooth.h is not part of user API, so __ variants are not neccessary
> > > > here.
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed 2016-10-05 10:53:16, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 13:14 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> > > bluetooth.h is not part of user API, so __ variants are not neccessary
> > > here.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/net/blue
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 13:14 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> > bluetooth.h is not part of user API, so __ variants are not neccessary
> > here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> > b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
[]
> >
Hi Pavel,
> bluetooth.h is not part of user API, so __ variants are not neccessary
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
>
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> index bfd1590..aea0371 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> +++ b/
bluetooth.h is not part of user API, so __ variants are not neccessary
here.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
index bfd1590..aea0371 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetoot
14 matches
Mail list logo
