Hi Pavel,

> bluetooth.h is not part of user API, so __ variants are not neccessary
> here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h 
> b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> index bfd1590..aea0371 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@
> 
> #define BT_SECURITY   4
> struct bt_security {
> -     __u8 level;
> -     __u8 key_size;
> +     u8 level;
> +     u8 key_size;
> };
> #define BT_SECURITY_SDP               0
> #define BT_SECURITY_LOW               1
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct bt_security {
> 
> #define BT_POWER      9
> struct bt_power {
> -     __u8 force_active;
> +     u8 force_active;
> };
> #define BT_POWER_FORCE_ACTIVE_OFF 0
> #define BT_POWER_FORCE_ACTIVE_ON  1
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct bt_power {
> 
> #define BT_VOICE              11
> struct bt_voice {
> -     __u16 setting;
> +     u16 setting;
> };
> 
> #define BT_VOICE_TRANSPARENT                  0x0003
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static inline const char *state_to_string(int state)
> 
> /* BD Address */
> typedef struct {
> -     __u8 b[6];
> +     u8 b[6];
> } __packed bdaddr_t;
> 

can you leave these out please. They are meant to become UAPI eventually.

> /* BD Address type */
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ typedef struct {
> #define BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC      0x01
> #define BDADDR_LE_RANDOM      0x02
> 
> -static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_valid(__u8 type)
> +static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_valid(u8 type)
> {
>       switch (type) {
>       case BDADDR_BREDR:
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_valid(__u8 type)
>       return false;
> }
> 
> -static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_le(__u8 type)
> +static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_le(u8 type)
> {
>       switch (type) {
>       case BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC:
> @@ -278,15 +278,16 @@ struct sock *bt_accept_dequeue(struct sock *parent, 
> struct socket *newsock);
> 
> /* Skb helpers */
> struct l2cap_ctrl {
> -     __u8    sframe:1,
> +     u8      sframe:1,
>               poll:1,
>               final:1,
>               fcs:1,
>               sar:2,
>               super:2;
> -     __u16   reqseq;
> -     __u16   txseq;
> -     __u8    retries;
> +
> +     u16     reqseq;
> +     u16     txseq;
> +     u8      retries;
>       __le16  psm;
>       bdaddr_t bdaddr;
>       struct l2cap_chan *chan;
> @@ -302,7 +303,7 @@ typedef void (*hci_req_complete_skb_t)(struct hci_dev 
> *hdev, u8 status,
> #define HCI_REQ_SKB   BIT(1)
> 
> struct hci_ctrl {
> -     __u16 opcode;
> +     u16 opcode;
>       u8 req_flags;
>       u8 req_event;
>       union {
> @@ -312,10 +313,10 @@ struct hci_ctrl {
> };
> 
> struct bt_skb_cb {
> -     __u8 pkt_type;
> -     __u8 force_active;
> -     __u16 expect;
> -     __u8 incoming:1;
> +     u8 pkt_type;
> +     u8 force_active;
> +     u16 expect;
> +     u8 incoming:1;
>       union {
>               struct l2cap_ctrl l2cap;
>               struct hci_ctrl hci;
> @@ -365,7 +366,7 @@ out:
>       return NULL;
> }
> 
> -int bt_to_errno(__u16 code);
> +int bt_to_errno(u16 code);

The rest looks good to me.

Regards

Marcel

Reply via email to