On Wed 2016-10-05 12:15:34, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 21:11 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2016-10-05 10:53:16, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 13:14 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > > > Hi Pavel,
> > > > 
> > > > > bluetooth.h is not part of user API, so __ variants are not neccessary
> > > > > here.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h 
> > > > > b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> > > 
> > > []
> > > > > struct bt_skb_cb {
> > > > > -     __u8 pkt_type;
> > > > > -     __u8 force_active;
> > > > > -     __u16 expect;
> > > > > -     __u8 incoming:1;
> > > > > +     u8 pkt_type;
> > > > > +     u8 force_active;
> > > > > +     u16 expect;
> > > > > +     u8 incoming:1;
> > > > >       union {
> > > > >               struct l2cap_ctrl l2cap;
> > > > >               struct hci_ctrl hci;
> > > 
> > > 
> > > trivia:
> > > 
> > > It's generally faster to use bool instead of u8 foo:1;
> > 
> > Ok, but I'm not changing that in this patch.
> > (And actually, bool will take a lot more memory, right?)
> 
> No worries, and bool is the same size as u8.

Exactly what I'm talking about :-). One byte vs. one bit, right?

                                                                        Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to