On 12/5/05, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:17:24 -0200
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Agreed, I was quite annoyed when this happened to me:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ip r s
> > Object "r" is unknown, try "ip help".
> > [EMAIL PROT
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:17:24 -0200
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/23/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:00:37 +0100
> >
> > > So everytime I use "ip r" it will give me a warning? I h
On 11/23/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:00:37 +0100
>
> > So everytime I use "ip r" it will give me a warning? I hope
> > not, since I am used to using it this way. Ambiguousy is not
> > a problem IMO, I didn't
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would rather reduce the surprise factor to new users, than worry
> about keeping total compatibility with lazy typists. Not everyone reads
> the source to know what the order is.
>
> Maybe just a nattering warning as a compromise.
One question tha
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:00:37 +0100
> So everytime I use "ip r" it will give me a warning? I hope
> not, since I am used to using it this way. Ambiguousy is not
> a problem IMO, I didn't discover this behaviour by reading
> the source, but still never wo
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:00:37AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> So everytime I use "ip r" it will give me a warning? I hope
> not, since I am used to using it this way. Ambiguousy is not
> a problem IMO, I didn't discover this behaviour by reading
> the source, but still never wondered why "i
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:36:22PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
I would rather reduce the surprise factor to new users, than worry
about keeping total compatibility with lazy typists. Not everyone reads
the source to know what the order is.
Maybe just a nattering warning
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:36:22PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> I would rather reduce the surprise factor to new users, than worry
> about keeping total compatibility with lazy typists. Not everyone reads
> the source to know what the order is.
>
> Maybe just a nattering warning as a comp
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:10:55 +1100
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 07:30:40AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > What about 'ip r'? I've seen quite a few uses of that since it
> > always referred to 'ip route'.
> >
> > I'd prefer if we can just keep the existing beh
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 07:30:40AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> What about 'ip r'? I've seen quite a few uses of that since it
> always referred to 'ip route'.
>
> I'd prefer if we can just keep the existing behaviour rather than
> making it an error.
Another reason to keep things like 'ip m' an
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I added them back as well as better ambiguous command matching.
> i.e. ip m
> is now an error.
What about 'ip r'? I've seen quite a few uses of that since it
always referred to 'ip route'.
I'd prefer if we can just keep the existing behaviour rathe
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:50:45 +0100
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Antonio Dias wrote:
> > Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>It was broken in a CVS version, not sure if it ever was released. No one
> >>wants to remove it.
> >
> >
> > Alright but... it was removed!
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >No, the change you quoted at the beginning of this thread fixed
> >shortcuts, which means instead of address you can also use
> >"a", "ad", "add", and so on. Actually the ordering of this list
> >also matters to keep full compatibility, I need to rechec
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Antonio Dias wrote:
Hum... to me seens like your patch will restore those lost objects but
will discard shortcuts "addr", "maddr" and "neigh" and I think this will
cause problems too.
No, the change you quoted at the beginning of this thread fixed
shortcuts, which mean
Antonio Dias wrote:
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed, it seems quite a few commands got lost. This patch restores
them.
Index: ip/ip.c
===
RCS file: /repos/iproute2/ip/ip.c,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed, it seems quite a few commands got lost. This patch restores
> them.
> Index: ip/ip.c
> ===
> RCS file: /repos/iproute2/ip/ip.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -u -r1.10 ip.c
> -
Antonio Dias wrote:
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was broken in a CVS version, not sure if it ever was released. No one
wants to remove it.
Alright but... it was removed! See:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ip -V
ip utility, iproute2-ss051107
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ip
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was broken in a CVS version, not sure if it ever was released. No one
> wants to remove it.
Alright but... it was removed! See:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ip -V
ip utility, iproute2-ss051107
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ip -4 addre
jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would agree. This is a bad idea which has actually already bitten me.
Here it took me some time to figure it out why, after iproute2 upgrade
and a reboot, my ethernet adapters didn't get their addresses as usual.
Only after a diff between my old iproute2 packag
Antonio Dias wrote:
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick McHardy
* Fix ip command shortcuts
Is there a good reason to remove "ip address" command alias for "ip
addr"? IMHO this is nonsense and will break scripts. Again IMHO this
should be explicit listed in the changel
On Tue, 2005-22-11 at 00:01 -0300, Antonio Dias wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Patrick McHardy
> > * Fix ip command shortcuts
>
> Is there a good reason to remove "ip address" command alias for "ip
> addr"? IMHO this is nonsense and will break scripts. Again IMHO
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick McHardy
> * Fix ip command shortcuts
Is there a good reason to remove "ip address" command alias for "ip
addr"? IMHO this is nonsense and will break scripts. Again IMHO this
should be explicit listed in the changelog in the place of th
Update to iproute2 is available. Most of the changes were to repair the
things that broke with the introduction of the batch mode to the ip command.
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.14-051107.tar.gz
For info on CVS ans other info see:
http://linux-net.
23 matches
Mail list logo
