On 11/23/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:00:37 +0100 > > > So everytime I use "ip r" it will give me a warning? I hope > > not, since I am used to using it this way. Ambiguousy is not > > a problem IMO, I didn't discover this behaviour by reading > > the source, but still never wondered why "ip r" shows me routes > > and not rules. Its just something you get used to. > > I totally agree and I've seen more than a handfull > of folks typing "ip r add ..." and similar while watching > over their shoulder. This isn't isolated usage, it's > quite common.
Agreed, I was quite annoyed when this happened to me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ip r s Object "r" is unknown, try "ip help". [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q iproute2 iproute2-ss050901-79426cl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# When for years I enjoyed using it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ip r s 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.4 metric 10 default via 192.168.1.2 dev eth0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q iproute2 iproute2-2.6.10-2mdk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
