On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:17:24 -0200 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/23/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:00:37 +0100 > > > > > So everytime I use "ip r" it will give me a warning? I hope > > > not, since I am used to using it this way. Ambiguousy is not > > > a problem IMO, I didn't discover this behaviour by reading > > > the source, but still never wondered why "ip r" shows me routes > > > and not rules. Its just something you get used to. > > > > I totally agree and I've seen more than a handfull > > of folks typing "ip r add ..." and similar while watching > > over their shoulder. This isn't isolated usage, it's > > quite common. > > Agreed, I was quite annoyed when this happened to me: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ip r s > Object "r" is unknown, try "ip help". > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q iproute2 > iproute2-ss050901-79426cl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# > > When for years I enjoyed using it: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ip r s > 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.4 metric 10 > default via 192.168.1.2 dev eth0 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q iproute2 > iproute2-2.6.10-2mdk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# The old behaviour is back (in CVS). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
