On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 10:50 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:41:06PM +0300, Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) wrote:
> > +#define B100T1_PMAPMD_CTL 0x0834
> > +#define B100T1_PMAPMD_CONFIG_ENBIT(15)
> > +#define B100T1_PMAPMD_MASTER
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 16:23 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > It is purely a C45 device.
>
> > Even if the PHY will be based on the same IP or not, if it is a C45
> > PHY, it will be supported by this driver. We are not talking about
> > 2 or
> > 3 PHYs. This driver will support all future C45 PHYs. T
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 14:57 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:02:07PM +0300, Radu Nicolae Pirea (NXP
> OSS) wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 21:36 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:41:06PM +0300, Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
> > >
On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 21:36 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:41:06PM +0300, Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) wrote:
> > Add driver for tja1103 driver and for future NXP C45 PHYs.
>
> So apart from c45 vs c22, how does this differ to nxp-tja11xx.c?
> Do we really want two different driver
On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 21:18 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 09.04.2021 20:41, Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) wrote:
> > Add driver for tja1103 driver and for future NXP C45 PHYs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
> >
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 6 +
> > drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
