On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 16:23 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > It is purely a C45 device. > > > Even if the PHY will be based on the same IP or not, if it is a C45 > > PHY, it will be supported by this driver. We are not talking about > > 2 or > > 3 PHYs. This driver will support all future C45 PHYs. That's why we > > named it "NXP C45". > > So if in future you produce C45 multi-gige PHYs, which have nothing > in > common with the T1 automative PHY, it will still be in this driver? Yes. C45 is robust and, if the PHY interface is standard, you can support Base-T, Base-T1, and so on in the same register interface. > > Andrew
Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driver for tja1103
Radu Nicolae Pirea (NXP OSS) Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:49:17 -0700
- [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driver for tja110... Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driver f... Heiner Kallweit
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driv... Radu Nicolae Pirea (NXP OSS)
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driver f... Jakub Kicinski
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driver f... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driv... Radu Nicolae Pirea (NXP OSS)
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add ... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: ... Radu Nicolae Pirea (NXP OSS)
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [PATCH] phy: ... Radu Nicolae Pirea (NXP OSS)
- Re: [PATCH] p... Andrew Lunn
- Re: Re: [PATC... Christian Herber
- Re: Re: [PATC... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [PATCH] p... Christian Herber
- Re: [PATCH] p... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [PATCH] p... Christian Herber
- Re: [PATCH] p... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driver f... kernel test robot
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driver f... Russell King - ARM Linux admin
- Re: [PATCH] phy: nxp-c45: add driv... Radu Nicolae Pirea (NXP OSS)