On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:17:24 -0200
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/23/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:00:37 +0100
> >
> > > So everytime I use "ip r" it will give me a warning? I h
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 01:23:09PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains an attempt to properly build hostap.o without
> #incude'ing C files.
Looks good. However, I did not test this now since this did not apply to
netdev-2.6 (it does not have hostap_main.c). Did the hostap.c to
hostap_
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> sk98lin: fix checksumming code
> sk98lin: add permanent address support
> sk98lin: avoid message confusion with skge
I have an Asus P4P800 "Deluxe" with 3c940 LOM.
If I ping the box I get the following:
Dec 4 2
On 12/4/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:03:07 -0200
>
> > Dave can we expect a rebase of 2.6.16.git to get these
> > things there?
>
> Done, the net-2.6.16 tree has been rebased.
Thanks Dave.
- Arnaldo
This patch against 2.6.14 converts the natsemi driver to use NAPI. It
was originally based on one written by Harald Welte, though it has since
been modified quite a bit, most extensively in order to remove the
ability to disable NAPI since none of the other drivers seem to provide
that functionali
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 11:06:02PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
If there is a DNAT in the way, this will jump to the very start of
the stack. So if we have a hostile IPsec peer, and the DNAT rules
are such that this can occur, then we could be in trouble (especially
because p
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 11:09:09PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> Thanks, I've added the correct patch now :) Unless I missed something,
> it was still missing a call to dst_output after the last transform
> in xfrm4_output_finish, unless we keep the loop in dst_output.
Good catch. The lines
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 11:06:02PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> >I'm worried about this bit. This looks like it'll go back to the top
> >of the IP stack with the existing call chain. So could grow as the
> >number of transforms increase.
>
> Its not so bad. It adds ip_xfrm_transport_hook an
Herbert Xu wrote:
before tunnel mode transforms and added a missing dst_output call
for the final packet.
This shouldn't be necessary if you apply it on top of my previous
patch which made xfrm[46]_output process the first SA and all subsequent
transport mode SAs. I've included that patch here
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:31:36PM +, Patrick McHardy wrote:
@@ -145,7 +149,17 @@ int xfrm4_rcv_encap(struct sk_buff *skb,
netif_rx(skb);
return 0;
} else {
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER
+ __skb_push(skb, skb->data - skb->nh
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:03:07 -0200
> Dave can we expect a rebase of 2.6.16.git to get these
> things there?
Done, the net-2.6.16 tree has been rebased.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 02:33:18PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >WIRELESS_EXT < 18 will never be true in the kernel.
> >
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >---
> >
> > drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c | 434 --
> > drivers/ne
Adrian Bunk wrote:
WIRELESS_EXT < 18 will never be true in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c | 434 --
drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/acx_struct.h |5
drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/common.c |4
On 11/23/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:00:37 +0100
>
> > So everytime I use "ip r" it will give me a warning? I hope
> > not, since I am used to using it this way. Ambiguousy is not
> > a problem IMO, I didn't
Hello,
>
> I would suggest trying the latest released driver 6.2.15. It
> performance enhancements added, which should help.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000
Finally i can build and insert the new module. :-)
But the performance problem is still here.
This is the /sys/block/nbd#/stat f
Hi,
can some of you help me to solve the following problem?
I'm using IEEE DIS protocol, that use UDP broadcast packets to send protcol
messages (PDUs).
The host that receive the messages has 2 network interfaces:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:8D:E3:19
inet addr:1
16 matches
Mail list logo
