or re-compilation.
What's your opinion on this ? any comment is welcome.
Thank you
- Jonathan Lu
---
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name
[2] http://download.java.net/jdk8/docs/api/java/net/IDN.html
[3] http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/
[
l.x.mcma...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 20/02/14 03:15, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks a lot for your comments.
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Michael McMahon <
> michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> I think it's a good
Hello,
Could I have following patch reviewed for bug 8034954 ?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/JDK-8043954/
The patch is to fix a behavior difference of connect() API for AIX platform,
according to the documentation,
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_aix_71/com.ibm.aix.commtrf
urrent implementation (just curious)?
>
The change is now an improvement.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Lu
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Could I have following patch reviewed for bug 8034954 ?
> &g
Hi Alan,
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Alan Bateman
wrote:
> On 04/06/2014 07:31, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>
>> Hi Volker,
>>
>> Thanks for your comment! an updated webrev was made at
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/JDK-8043954.2/
>>
>> Would it make
Hi Alan,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Alan Bateman
wrote:
> On 05/06/2014 11:37, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>
>
> If getsockopt(SO_ERROR) failed, I did not find any explicit docs about
> the behavior.
> but as I tested with some C code snippet, the value of sockopt_arg would
&
ression tests without specific issues.
>
> So thumbs up from me!
>
> Regards,
> Volker
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Jonathan Lu
> wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Alan Bateman
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
= netaddrP;
Best regards!
Jonathan Lu
netaddrP);
+if (count == -1) {
return NULL;
}
}
And from my point of view, such scenario may also appear in other parts,
maybe a more thorough check is needed for all modules.
Regards!
- Jonathan Lu
On 08/29/2011 04:40 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Jonathan,
I think the chan
/webrev.1/
Thanks,
Michael.
On 29/08/11 15:33, Michael McMahon wrote:
Jonathan,
Bug id 7084560 has been created to track this. That fix looks fine
to me.
Thanks,
Michael.
On 29/08/11 10:20, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for reminding, I checked the source under src/windows folder
and
Aha, got it, thanks!
Jonathan.
On 09/07/2011 04:19 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Jonathan,
The tests were fine amd the fix was pushed last week.
Michael.
On 07/09/11 09:14, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi Michael,
Any news about the testing results of this patch?
Thanks
Jonathan
On 08/29/2011 11:02
Hi net-devs,
I've got a problem on AIX operating system when IPv6 is enabled,which
can be easily reproduced by attached test case NetworkInterfaceTest.java.
On AIX paltform, the /proc file system behaves differently from Linux,
so we cannot just read required lines from /proc/net/if_inet6 but t
On 10/19/2011 06:03 PM, Steve Poole wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:14 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi net-devs,
I've got a problem on AIX operating system when IPv6 is enabled,which
can be easily reproduced by attached test case NetworkInterfaceTest.java.
On AIX paltform, the /proc file s
On 10/20/2011 01:24 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
On 10/19/2011 06:03 PM, Steve Poole wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:14 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi net-devs,
I've got a problem on AIX operating system when IPv6 is enabled,which
can be easily reproduced by attached test
On 10/20/2011 02:35 PM, Steve Poole wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 13:24 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote:
On 10/19/2011 06:03 PM, Steve Poole wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:14 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi net-devs,
I've got a problem on AIX operating system when IPv6 is enabled,which
can be e
On 10/20/2011 09:16 PM, Neil Richards wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 17:12 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote:
On 10/20/2011 02:35 PM, Steve Poole wrote:
Thanks Steve, I've updated the test case and patch, see the attachments.
I've added IBM portions copyright comment to both headers.
- Jonathan
Hello Chris,
On 10/25/2011 05:41 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 10/25/11 08:31 AM, Charles Lee wrote:
Hi guys,
I am reading some native code in the jdk repos. I find that in
Inet4AddressImpl.c (folder solaris), gethostbyname is used. Meanwhile in
the Inet6AddressImpl.c. getaddrinfo is used. My q
Hi Sean,
Patch committed
Changeset: 15a6b0bceb1e
Author:zhouyx
Date: 2012-07-06 10:36 +0800
URL:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/15a6b0bceb1e
7181353: Update error message to distinguish native OOM and java OOM in net
Reviewed-by: chegar
! src/solaris/native/java/net/Inet4Ad
On 08/17/2012 04:14 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 16/08/12 10:21, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Chris and Alan,
Thank you for taking time to help this issue. I have built using
latest openjdk 8 repo on Windows 64 and Linux 32/64. Since it's a macro
change in path "src/solaris", I only did jtreg t
Hi Frank,
Patch pushed @ http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/883feced1cdd
Best regards!
- Jonathan
On 12/11/2012 09:49 AM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi All,
Thank you all. I will have Jonathan help to commit.
Best regards,
Frank
On 12/10/2012 6:12 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 10/12/2012 08
20 matches
Mail list logo
