[mailto:vyom.tew...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:26 AM
To: Chris Hegarty ; Mark Sheppard
; net-dev ; Kaczmarek, Eric
; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Kharbas, Kishor ;
Aundhe, Shirish ; Lu, Yingqi
Subject: Re: RFR 8153674: Expected SocketException not thrown when calling
bind() with
Thank you for your help, Alan!
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 9:55 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Volker Simonis
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Kharbas, Kishor ;
Aundhe, Shirish ; Kaczmarek, Eric
Thank u very much, Alan!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:18 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 16/02/2016 18:03, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> I am wondering if you got chances to review the latest patch? Thank you!
>>
>> T
Hi Alan,
I am wondering if you got chances to review the latest patch? Thank you!
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: net-dev [mailto:net-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:47 AM
To: Alan Bateman ; Volker Simonis
; Michael
Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 10:38 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Volker Simonis
; Michael McMahon
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Kharbas, Kishor ;
Aundhe, Shirish ; Kaczmarek, Eric
Subject: Re: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
addition, we corrected couple formatting issues.
Please let us know your feedback and comments.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 6:38 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Volker Simonis
; Michael McMahon
Cc: net-dev
addReusePortOption() to be both thread safe and package private.
Please let us know your feedback and comments.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 4:29 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Viswanathan
consistent with the rest of
the code.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 9:56 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Volker Simonis
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Kharbas, Kishor ;
Aundhe, Shirish
...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 7:38 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Volker Simonis
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Kharbas, Kishor ;
Aundhe, Shirish ; Kaczmarek, Eric
Subject: Re: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
On 05/01/2016 18:56, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>
your help,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 8:00 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Volker Simonis
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Kharbas, Kishor ;
Aundhe, Shirish ; Kaczmarek, Eric
Subject: Re: Patch
...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:30 PM
To: Volker Simonis ; Alan Bateman
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Kharbas, Kishor ;
Aundhe, Shirish ; Kaczmarek, Eric
Subject: RE: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
One more
: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 11:26 AM
To: Alan Bateman
Cc: Lu, Yingqi ; Kaczmarek, Eric
; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Kharbas, Kishor ;
Aundhe, Shirish ; net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016
, really appreciate the quick responses and helpful feedback from both of
you :-)
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 10:43 AM
To: Alan Bateman
Cc: Lu, Yingqi ; Kaczmarek, Eric
; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Kharbas
: Lu, Yingqi
Cc: Viswanathan, Sandhya ;
net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Kharbas, Kishor ; Aundhe,
Shirish ; Kaczmarek, Eric
Subject: Re: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
On 21/12/2015 17:53, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. Here is the link to the mo
PORT to be disabled by default for both
ServerSocketChannelImpl and SocketChannelImpl. Leave the feature enablement to
the users.
14. Updated the copyright date.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-----
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 10:25 PM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Alan Bateman ;
Micha
ryone.
13. Make SO_REUSEPORT to be disabled by default for both
ServerSocketChannelImpl and SocketChannelImpl. Leave the feature enablement to
the users.
14. Updated the copyright date.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: net-dev [mailto:net-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of
Thank you very much for your help, Alan!
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:46 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Michael McMahon
; Volker Simonis
Cc: Kaczmarek, Eric ; net-dev@openjdk.java.net;
Kharbas, Kishor
OpenJDK9. We will
surely continue working with the community to address opens/issues until it is
completely ready to be merged into the source code tree.
Please let us know what you think.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 1:02 PM
To: '
OK, will do.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 1:01 PM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Volker Simonis
Cc: Michael McMahon ; Kaczmarek, Eric
; net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Kharbas, Kishor
Subject: Re: Patch for adding
that block and leave it to the user.
Please let me know!
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 10:38 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi
Cc: Alan Bateman ; Michael McMahon
; Kaczmarek, Eric ;
net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Kharb
mo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 9:51 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Alan Bateman ;
Michael McMahon
Cc: Kaczmarek, Eric ; net-dev@openjdk.java.net;
Kharbas, Kishor
Subject: Re: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
Hi Lucy,
thanks for updating the change and sorry for the late rev
API
is the SO_REUSEPORT option itself in StandardSocketOptions.
- Michael
On 07/12/15 17:04, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
Hi Alan and Michael,
Thank you very much for your detailed feedback. Before I start modify the code,
I want to make sure I understand correctly. Regarding the following comment, do
you
ption/getOption
should be fine.
I will work on this today. Hopefully can send out an update tomorrow.
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 7:04 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Kharbas, Kishor ;
Kaczmarek, Eric
Subjec
Hi All,
A quick check here. Does anyone get a chance to try the most recent patch? Any
feedback and comments?
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 11:25 PM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Volker Simonis
Cc: Kaczmarek, Eric ; net-dev@openjdk.java.net;
Kharbas, Kishor
Subject: RE
...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:12 PM
To: Volker Simonis
Cc: Kaczmarek, Eric ; net-dev@openjdk.java.net;
Kharbas, Kishor
Subject: RE: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
Here is an update.
Changes are already completed locally. All the
to the Thanksgiving holiday schedule, we will send updated webrev package
on Monday.
Thank you all for your help and happy thanksgiving!
Lucy
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:23 PM
To: 'Volker Simonis'
Cc: Michael McMahon ; Alan Bateman
; Kharbas, Kishor
Yes, it should work! I already located the issues. Good catch!
I will submit an update as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:17 PM
To: Lu, Yingqi
Cc: Michael McMahon ; Alan Bateman
; Kharbas, Kishor
can.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Volker Simonis [mailto:volker.simo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:46 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi
Cc: Michael McMahon ; Alan Bateman
; Kharbas, Kishor ;
net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Kaczmarek, Eric
Subject: Re: Patch for adding
_DGRAM sockets, SO_REUSEADDR allows
>multiple sockets to receive UDP multicast datagrams addressed to
>the bound port number. For all SOCK_DGRAM sockets bound to the
>same local address, SO_REUSEADDR must be set before calling
>bind().
>
>S
ael.x.mcma...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 3:42 AM
To: Volker Simonis ; Alan Bateman
Cc: Kharbas, Kishor ; net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Lu,
Yingqi
Subject: Re: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
How about the following for the apidoc in j.n.StandardSocketOptions?
We can then refe
, November 22, 2015 12:25 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Kharbas, Kishor
; net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
On 21/11/2015 02:08, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
Hi Alan,
Please let me know if there is anything we can do at the meantime to help. We
are more than happy to
this socket option
* after the socket is bound has no effect.
*
* @see https://lwn.net/Articles/542629/";>
* @see ServerSocket#setReusePort
*/
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2015 12:25 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi ;
Hi Alan,
Please let me know if there is anything we can do at the meantime to help. We
are more than happy to help.
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 2:53 PM
To: Lu, Yingqi ; Kharbas, Kishor
; net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Michael
set/get reuseport. The file is located at
./jdk/test/java/net/Socket/setReusePort/Basic.java
Please let us know your comments and feedback!
Thanks,
Lucy
From: net-dev [mailto:net-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 12:21 PM
To: Alan Bateman
Hi Alan and Michael,
Thank very much to both of you for your feedback.
Currently, I think the only platform that does not have SO_REUSEPORT is
Windows. As Michael mentioned, API allows this possibility by throwing
SocketException with message "Invalid option". Older kernel that does not
suppor
OpenJDK so that
users can take advantage of it.
Thanks,
Yingqi (Lucy) Lu
From: Michael McMahon [mailto:michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 9:12 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi; Kharbas, Kishor; net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option
Hi
Yes, that was our first version of the patch.
We just completed the second version which will be uploaded soon, hopefully
today. In the new version, we implemented the SO_REUSEPORT as an extended
socket option (jdk.net.ExtendedSocketOptions) instead of the standard socket
option.
Once we are d
Hi Michael,
Thank you very much for your email.
The version 1 of the patch is already uploaded at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcberg/jdk/6432031/webrev.01/. The link is also
available from https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6432031.
We just completed the version 2 which implements the SO
38 matches
Mail list logo
