Hi Alan, I heard that the feature freeze for OpenJDK9 is approaching. Given the significant performance impact (up to 1.93x with Hadoop Distributed File System) this feature provides and the status of the existing work, we would be really interested in see this feature to be approved for OpenJDK9. We will surely continue working with the community to address opens/issues until it is completely ready to be merged into the source code tree.
Please let us know what you think. Thanks, Lucy -----Original Message----- From: Lu, Yingqi Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 1:02 PM To: 'Alan Bateman' <alan.bate...@oracle.com>; Volker Simonis <volker.simo...@gmail.com> Cc: Michael McMahon <michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com>; Kaczmarek, Eric <eric.kaczma...@intel.com>; net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Kharbas, Kishor <kishor.khar...@intel.com> Subject: RE: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option OK, will do. Thanks, Lucy -----Original Message----- From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 1:01 PM To: Lu, Yingqi <yingqi...@intel.com>; Volker Simonis <volker.simo...@gmail.com> Cc: Michael McMahon <michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com>; Kaczmarek, Eric <eric.kaczma...@intel.com>; net-dev@openjdk.java.net; Kharbas, Kishor <kishor.khar...@intel.com> Subject: Re: Patch for adding SO_REUSEPORT socket option On 07/12/2015 18:59, Lu, Yingqi wrote: > Oh, I got it now. You want SO_REUSEPORT to be disabled by default for both > ServerSocketChannelImpl and SocketChannelImpl. > > I am actually OK either way. Alan/Michael, what is your take on this? If we > all think "default off" is the correct/better way to go, we can just simply > remove that block and leave it to the user. > Off by disabled make sense to me. -Alan
