On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 01:05:22 GMT, Bernd wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Enrich the APIs specification
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/ssl/SSLConfiguration.java line 410:
>
>> 408
> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280494
Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request increment
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:58:37 GMT, Bernd wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Copyright correction
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 763:
>
>> 761:
>> 762:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:26:56 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Copyright correction
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 94:
>
>> 92:
>> 93:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:54:53 GMT, Bernd wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Copyright correction
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 92:
>
>> 90: private int
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:50:49 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
>> You should also define the interaction with the system properties (probably
>> as an @implNote). Does `getSignatureSchemes` ever return the value of the
>> system properties? Does the `setSignatureSchemes` API always override the
>> prope
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:17:25 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Copyright correction
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 709:
>
>> 707: *
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:58:55 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This change adds Channel Binding Token (CBT) support to HTTPS
>> (java.net.HttpsURLConnection) when used with the Negotiate (SPNEGO,
>> Kerberos) authentication scheme. When enabled, the implementation
>> preemptively inclu
> Hi,
>
> This change adds Channel Binding Token (CBT) support to HTTPS
> (java.net.HttpsURLConnection) when used with the Negotiate (SPNEGO, Kerberos)
> authentication scheme. When enabled, the implementation preemptively includes
> a CBT with authentication requests over Kerberos. The feature
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:56:07 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>
> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
> is treated as the default route address.
> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not accepted
> as a vaild psuedo IP
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:44:16 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 710:
>>
>>> 708: * Signature Schemes section of the Java Cryptography
>>> 709: * Architecture Standard Algorithm Name Documentation, and may also
>>> 710: * in
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:17:28 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Copyright correction
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 710:
>
>> 708: *
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:56:07 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>
> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
> is treated as the default route address.
> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not accepted
> as a vaild psuedo IP
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 07:21:56 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
>> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
>> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-
-Original Message-
From: net-dev On Behalf Of Michael McMahon
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2022 16:14
To: net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8280498: [aix]: jdk/java/net/Inet4Address/PingThis.java
fails
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:46:32 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> If it defeats t
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:11:04 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>> Or is it possible to change the implementation on AIX so the test passes
>>> without change?
>>
>> * Digging into the java guts to map "0.0.0.0" to "127.0.0.1" seems too far
>> to me - as I believe interfaces are not suppossed to be
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:46:32 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> If it defeats the purpose, then it needs to be skipped.
>>
>> * When I was trying to understand the test, it seemed to be that it
>> _assumed_ that "0.0.0.0" was 'converted' to 127.0.0.1.
>> * If there is an international standard (ISO, P
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:37:00 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Or is it possible to change the implementation on AIX so the test passes
>> without change?
>
> If it defeats the purpose, then it needs to be skipped.
>
> * When I was trying to understand the test, it seemed to be that it _assumed_
> t
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:30:01 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/net/Inet4Address/PingThis.java line 62:
>>
>>> 60: else {
>>> 61: addrs.add("0.0.0.0");
>>> 62: }
>>
>> This conflicts with the purpose of the test. Maybe this test needs to be
>>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:26:51 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> > Does the label being removed mean the site knows I now have an _oca_?
>
> Yes. The oca label was removed by the bot. It also did sent the mail to the
> associated ML
> (https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2022-January/01738
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:28:43 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>>
>> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
>> is treated as the default route address.
>> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not accepted
>> as a vaild psu
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:52:12 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> Does the label being removed mean the site knows I now have an _oca_?
Yes. The oca label was removed by the bot. It also did sent the mail to the
associated ML
(https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2022-January/017386.html).
Y
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:56:07 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>
> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
> is treated as the default route address.
> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not accepted
> as a vaild psuedo IP
Hi, I went to the ticket you opened – and it seems I need to do something
additional – as I cannot login to comment (should I need to).
Thx again for opening the ticket.
From: Thomas Stüfe
Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2022 11:23
To: Alan Bateman
Cc: Michael Felt ; ppc-aix-port-dev
; net-
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:59:25 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>>
>> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
>> is treated as the default route address.
>> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not accepted
>> as a vaild psu
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:59:25 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>If above is sufficient for the JBS issue - fantistic - otherwise I'll
try and get something less chatty from code.
That would be nice.
>> * and of course, we need you to sign the OCA.
> where is that?
https://openjdk.java.net/contribute/ o
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:56:07 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>
> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
> is treated as the default route address.
> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not accepted
> as a vaild psuedo IP
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:56:07 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>
> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
> is treated as the default route address.
> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not accepted
> as a vaild psuedo IP
with IP "0.0.0.0"
- it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
is treated as the default route address.
- IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not accepted
as a vaild psuedo IPv6 address. '::1' must be used instead.
ping: bind: The socket name
Please find enclosed a simple test fix for:
8280868: LineBodyHandlerTest.java creates and discards too many clients
The LineBodyHandlerTest.java creates and discards many clients (64).
The test has been observed failing intermittently on some systems (Windows 10)
while trying to open the client's
30 matches
Mail list logo
