Re: RFR 15 8243099: SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID support

2020-05-21 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Vladimir, That looks good. Give me time to send that to our test system and I'll report back. best regards, -- daniel On 21/05/2020 18:07, Ivanov, Vladimir A wrote: Thanks Daniel, the exception was updated. Could you please review: Bug ID:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8245569 We

Re: [JBS] {Updated} (JDK-8245517) java/net/SocketOption/AfterClose.java fails with Invalid value 'READ_ONLY'

2020-05-21 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Vladimir, The changes look good to me. I imported your patch and sent it to our test systems. Please wait until I report back that all is clear before pushing. best regards, -- daniel On 21/05/2020 19:10, Ivanov, Vladimir A wrote: Hello everyone, seems, the test java/net/SocketOption/Afte

RE: [JBS] {Updated} (JDK-8245517) java/net/SocketOption/AfterClose.java fails with Invalid value 'READ_ONLY'

2020-05-21 Thread Ivanov, Vladimir A
Hello everyone, seems, the test java/net/SocketOption/AfterClose.java was updated in parallel with SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID changes. To support new option this test should be updated. Could you please review changes at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sviswanathan/Vladimir/8245517/webrev.00/ ? Thanks, Vla

RE: RFR 15 8243099: SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID support

2020-05-21 Thread Ivanov, Vladimir A
Thanks Daniel, the exception was updated. Could you please review: Bug ID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8245569 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sviswanathan/Vladimir/8245569/webrev.00/ Thanks, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Viswanathan, Sandhya Sent: Thursday, May 21

RE: RFR 15 8243099: SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID support

2020-05-21 Thread Viswanathan, Sandhya
Hi Daniel, Vladimir just pointed our that I missed pushing the SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID tests (forgot to do hg add). I will create a separate JBS entry for tests. Vladimir could do this change as part of that. Best Regards, Sandhya -Original Message- From: net-dev On Behalf Of Daniel Fuchs

Re: RFR 15 8243099: SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID support

2020-05-21 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Vladimir, On 14/05/2020 22:50, Ivanov, Vladimir A wrote: Thanks a lot Daniel! I missed these double checks. Updated webrev may be reviewed as http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sviswanathan/Vladimir/8243099/webrev.14 I use only one condition for the 'if' in the 'startup' method while kernel shoul

Re: RFR: 8243376 java.net.SocketPermission.implies(Permission p) spec is mismatching with implementation

2020-05-21 Thread Michael McMahon
Hi Jay, A couple of comments. There are other places in SocketPermission which assume that the addresses array only contains one element, eg getCanonName() assumes there is only one such name. The fix would have to account for the possibility of multiple canonical names (obtained from DNS rever

RFR: 8243376 java.net.SocketPermission.implies(Permission p) spec is mismatching with implementation

2020-05-21 Thread Jayashree Sk1
Hello, Please review the fix and Jtreg testcase to the following issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8243376 The proposed changeset is hosted at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vtewari/8243376/webrev/index.html The scenario is: - Some specified target hostname resolves to two IP addres