Re: IPv6 day non-participants

Was participating until we hit a rather nasty load balancer bug that took out the entire unit if clients with a short MTU connected and it needed to fragment packets (Citrix Netscaler running latest code). No fix is available for it yet, so we had to shut it down. Ran for about 9 hours before the

Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Joly MacFie wrote: > What seems evident, looking at > http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a > lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn > quick! Or ... folks switched it on and then it switched i

Re: IPv6 day non-participants

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote: >>> So if you are using a Netscaler with SLB-PT (IPv6 VIP balancing to >>> IPv4 servers), the entire LB is subject to stop working until they get >>> this fixed. >> >> And this is EXACTLY why we needed World IPv6 Day. > > Agreed, right on the mon

Re: IPv6 day non-participants

> > IMHO, it's worse than that.  Most sites only added a record for > their website, and frequently didn't for their DNS server.  So they > weren't *really* doing a complete IPv6 test, IMHO. There is a reason for that. First of all, we (my employer) took this as a brief test to simply see ho

Re: Cogent & HE

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote: > HE doesn't need to buy IPv6 transit, because they are in effect transit-free > (except to Cogent). It's not just a Cogent issue. They also chose not to buy from Level3 or buy those routes through a Level3 peer: >From HE's route-server: route-

Re: OOB management options @ 60 Hudson & 1 Summer

Give the Verizon Machine to Machine plan a try before you give up on the cellular. --Pete From: NANOG on behalf of Saku Ytti Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 12:33 AM To: Matthew Crocker Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: OOB management options @ 60 Hudson & 1 Summer On F

Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE

https://www.ekinops.com/products/flexrate-modules/aggregation-and-encryption-modules/pm-100g-agg --Pete PM 100G-AGG | Ekinops www.ekinops.com 100G aggregation module The EKINOPS PM 100G-AGG is a mu

RE: AS3549 NOC contacts? Another BGP hijack

Our info is up to date on the whois with ARIN where the issuance is from https://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS3549/pft?s=3549 Preferred is ipad...@centurylink.com From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Bolitho Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 4:33

Re: Centurylink Looking Glass fail

+1, or reactivate the Level(3) AS 3356 LG. --pete From: NANOG on behalf of Ca By Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 4:49 PM To: North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Centurylink Looking Glass fail Paging someone at Centurylink to fix your looking glass.

RE: rr.level3.net on autopilot?

Shoot an email to ipad...@centurylink.com and we'll give you a hand. If you are an active customer with valid circuit ID getting help from the NOC on this should be a solution they know how to provide, if you have reached the correct center. Folks that are not or have left behind old entries nee

Re: Disney+ Geolocation issues

We're seeing the same thing. Actually we saw it during pre-signup. Reached out to Disney+ weeks ago as well, with no response. Now it's launched, our support lines are flooded with people unable to give Disney all their moneys.We finally got through to Disney+ support after 2.5hrs on hold to

Looking for a Level 3 Routing Registry contact

Please contact me off list if you can help me get in touch with an actual person that can clear out old entries in the Level 3 routing registry. I can't do jack with the automated and the contacts that put them in are non responsive for clearing out their years old mess. Thanks. This communicat

Re: Status of IPv6 on Charter Communications

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 11:14:13AM -0400, David Hill wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 06:55:59AM -0700, Stephen Satchell wrote: > > Would someone at Charter Communications who is on this list indicate the > > roll-out schedule for IPv6 to business customers using cable modems as > > opposed to fi

SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

So I woke up this morning to discover my business FIOS had croaked about 3:30 AM :(. Everything looked good on the ONT, but couldn't ping the gateway. Poked at it from the other side, and it looked like traceroute died a hop or so short of what I remember, so seemed to be a layer 3 issue on their s

Re: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 06:56:13PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote: > Hopefully it won't be three days this time. Well, my FIOS mysteriously came back online about 9:45pm, a bit over 18 hours after it mysteriously dropped offline. I happened to be in the wiring closet staring angrily at

Re: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:01:03AM +, Mel Beckman wrote: > If a Frontier tech is on this list, I ask you kindly figure out what > the blasted deal is with your vanishing ticket numbers. This has been > going on for MONTHS! The cynic in me wonders if somebody is trying to artificially inflate

RE: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

> From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 6:49 AM > > Even if nothing else happens, calling in and reporting the problem *does* > (or at least it *should*) set the clock running for any SLA-related > compensation. I'm pretty sure FIOS doesn't have any contractual SLA's.

RE: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

> From: Christopher Morrow > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 8:42 AM > > and think about it, you could get ipv6 on your network... the OP still > doesn't have that native on his fios I bet. Yeah, sure, pour salt on my still open wound ;).

RE: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

> From: Matthew Black > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 9:41 AM > > I'm a Frontier FiOS customer in SoCal and have had trouble loading the > Google home page for weeks. Had trouble loading Gmail last night. When it's up, I rarely have connectivity issues. Of course, I have business class fios a

Re: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:57:10PM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > Have been evaluating going to more consumerish-grade circuits like this > at remote locations, but this scenario is one that has kept me sticking > with the more traditional (and more expensive) SLA-bound circuits. I'd call my busi

Re: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:16:43PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote: > maybe now would be a good time to ask your vz rep about this 'feature'? Hah. I asked Frontier right after the cutover and got the same Verizon smoke "Currently in the planning stages with no firm timeline for deployment."

RE: ALTDB - Getting records removed

Ditto also interested have dozens of old entries from previous delegations would like to see cleaned up but my google-foo tells me it's been a nonresponsive black hole several years now that probably should just go away if it's not going to be maintained properly. I think my favorite is the "Is

Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco

FS.COM --Pete From: NANOG on behalf of Ryugo Kikuchi Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:48:16 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Hey all, Does anyone have a recommended model of 3rd party's "QSFP-100G-LR4-S" for Cisco ASR and Nexu

RE: Youtube Outage

Well at least the BGP looks good this time and it's not being sent to Pakistan. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth McRae via NANOG Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 8:40 PM To: NANOG Subject: Youtube Outage Is this widespread? This communic

Re: FYI - Major upgrade this weekend to www.arin.net and ARIN Online

Link fails - ARTICLE NOT FOUN --Pete From: NANOG on behalf of John Curran Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 10:56:27 AM To: nanog list Subject: FYI - Major upgrade this weekend to www.arin.net and ARIN Online NANOGers - This weekend there will be a major up

RE: Issue with Geolocation in Virginia US

This sometimes helps https://support.google.com/websearch/contact/ip you should probably also seek out getting geo updated on at least 3 different ones you have 3 different results. 129.46.232.65 ip2location Raleigh NC neustarbutler TN maxmind Bridgewater NJ From: NANOG [mailto

Re: Cellular enabled console server

http://opengear.com/solutions/smart-out-band-management Out-of-Band Management - Opengear opengear.com Smart OOB™ is out-of-band access, management, auto-response and remediation for network resilience raised to a new level. The continued

Socal Frontier static IP cutover? (+OT fee bitch)

I was wondering if anybody has been contacted yet about cutting over their static IP addresses for Frontier business FIOS? Last year my understanding was that they were lent Verizon IP space for one year and everyone needed to be cutover by 4/2017; here it is 5/2017 and I've still heard nothing of

Frontier SoCal FIOS contact? - gateway proxy arp issue

So yesterday I started seeing some arp warnings in my server logs: Aug 23 16:09:29 lisa /bsd: arp info overwritten for 96.251.22.154 by f0:1c:2d:8d:0e:cf on em2 Aug 23 16:12:24 lisa /bsd: arp info overwritten for 96.251.22.154 by f0:1c:2d:8d:0e:cf on em2 Aug 23 16:21:28 lisa /bsd: arp info overwri

Re: 4 or smaller digit ASNs

acquired the original owner, or something, but I’ll be damned if > I can find historical data on who it originally belonged to. > > -b >

Re: 48vDC Output UPS

Unit in URL below has integrated distribution breakers and battery string breaker. It's a 1RU. you'll need at LEAST an additional 2RU for batteries. Supports float charging, has built-in battery low volt disconnect and battery thermal monitor. SNMP management over IPv4 supported. Available with

Re: 12 years ago today...

On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 01:43 -0700, Ali S wrote: > He should have been better known for his work. The intertubes will miss you One day I hope he'll be featured in school history lessons. An amazing legacy - something approaching 1/3rd of the planet's population uses it every time they use the 'net

Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA

On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 11:18 +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote: > MS Windows (at least 2k3 server) will simply drop packets with a > source > address of .0 or .255 coming from the legacy class C space, this hit > us > with some Win 2k3 servers that for a bunch of stupid reasons needed to > be connected to

Re: Mystery open source switching company claims top-of-rack price edge (was Re: Pica8 - Open Source Cloud Switch)

On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 20:08 +0200, Lin Pica8 wrote: > plonk ... goes your custom Marketing by annoyance, smoke, and mirrors? Gotta love the strategy cya

Re: Mystery open source switching company claims top-of-rack price edge (was Re: Pica8 - Open Source Cloud Switch)

On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 03:28 +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > >> plonk > > ... goes your custom > > Marketing by annoyance, smoke, and mirrors? Gotta love the strategy > > do not buy from spammers ...goes without saying. I'm just wondering if this a guerilla launch for some new Oracle product or proje

Re: Mystery open source switching company claims top-of-rack price edge (was Re: Pica8 - Open Source Cloud Switch)

On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 21:05 +0200, Lin Pica8 wrote: > Buy you glasses and a book about network engineering ;) ! eat your own words "in any of these ad-spam posts" Now get out, and stay out, of my NOCs Gord

Re: Token ring? topic hijack: was Re: Mystery open source switching

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 12:44 -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote: > In most if not all European countries (and likely most other countries > too) you pay a fee per time unit (say per minute) for local calls. in addition to a relatively high monthly "standing charge" subscription fee I might add! In th

Re: BGP support on ASA5585-X

On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:50 -0500, Tony Varriale wrote: > said: > >They could make it out of the box but this is why Dylan made his statement. > > His statement is far fetched at best. Unless of course he's speaking of 100 > million line ACLs. Can I just ask out of technical curiosity: Q: Wh

Re: Throttle traffic for a single local IP on a Linux router?

On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 18:32 -0500, jo...@hush.ai wrote: > $TC class add dev $INIF parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate $DNLD ceil > $DNLD > $TC class add dev $OUTIF parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate $UPLD ceil > $UPLD > $TC filter add dev $INIF parent 1:0 ip pref 1 u32 match ip src > $IP/32 0x f

Re: Throttle traffic for a single local IP on a Linux router?

On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 05:52 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: > Try a Linksys RV016, it has some decent traffic shaping tools for > larger home and small business networks. > Yes indeed it does. Ironically that device runs a linux-y kernel so is probably also using iptools/tc to achieve the shaping/pol

Latency issue - TWC NYC / Roadrunner - AS12271 / AS7843

Hi, If anyone from Time Warner Cable / Roadrunner is monitoring, there's been a high latency issue on your network in NYC both yesterday (for at least 10 hours) and again this evening to most/all of the internet. Please contact me off-list if you need more information. Thanks. Sample pings/traces

Looking for Time Warner contact AS10796

Could someone with Time Warner contact me off list I am getting nowhere with listed ARIN contact emails or cold calls into NOC on several hijacked ranges AS10796 is announcing of ours. Thanks. This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged informatio

So Cal Verizon Business FIOS to Frontier cutover

So the transition from Verizon to Frontier is coming up, and I recently got a notice from Verizon pointing me to the following website: http://meetfrontier.com/ Evidently one of the things Verizon did not sell to Frontier is their IP address space, as it seems customers with static IP addresses a

Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

We're in the beginning steps of bringing up IPv6 at the fairly large university where I work. We plan to use DHCPv6 rather than SLAAC for a variety of reasons. One of our guys recently noticed that Android has no support for DHCPv6, and a rather odd issue thread discussing it: https://code.google.

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:30:48AM +0100, Alan Buxey wrote: > Care to elaborate on the reasons? Heh, there's a reason I said "variety" ;). Honestly, I'm like 90% systems and 10% network, our network guys could probably better explain all of the underlying thought process. My primary task on the d

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

> From: Lorenzo Colitti > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 7:49 PM > > That sounds pretty stupid even for me, so probably something got lost in > translation. "Implementing stateful DHCPv6 would break planned use cases such as IPv6 tethering" "And it's not possible to enable tethering" "tethering

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

> From: Lorenzo Colitti > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 11:33 PM > > value of N. I'd be happy to work with people on an Internet draft or other [...] > It's also possible for Android to support DHCPv6 PD. Again I'd be happy to > work with people on a document that says that mobile devices should do

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

> From: Mikael Abrahamsson > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 12:05 AM > > You seem to fail to realise that you are not Lorenzos customer, his > customer is the OEMs that build mobile phones, and their customers who buy > Android phones. And he fails to realize that the people who buy android phone

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

> From: Ray Soucy > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 4:36 AM > > In practice, your device will just not be supported. [..] > If your client is broken because of an incomplete implementation, I just > won't give it an IPv6 address at all. I think a lot of others feel the > same way. [...] > already

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

k in their hand that is incapable of connecting to the network at all. Maybe you should try taking a poll of actual users? Dear user, would you rather: A) have a phone that connects to the network and the most part works barring some side cases B) have a phone that is incapable of connecting, bu

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

> From: Lorenzo Colitti > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 5:22 AM > > It's certainly a possibility for both sides in this debate to say "my way > or the highway", and wait and see what happens when operators start > removing support for IPv4. You are rather confused. Only one side of this debate

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

> From: Ray Soucy > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:06 AM > > As for thinking "long term" and "the future", we need devices to work > within current models of IPv6 to accelerate _adoption_ of IPv6 _today_ > before we can get to that future you're talking about. > > Not supporting DHCPv6 ultimatel

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

> From: Lorenzo Colitti > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 8:27 AM > > please do not construe my words on this thread as being Google's position > on anything. These messages were sent from my personal email address, and I > do not speak for my employer. Can we construe your postings on the issue t

RE: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

> From: Laszlo Hanyecz > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 4:42 PM > > from the university net Nazis Wow, it must be nice to live in a fairyland utopia where there is no DMCA, no federal laws such as HEOA, and a wide variety of other things you clearly know nothing about that require universities to b

another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

I think it's been about a year and a half since I last looked (and cried) at the status of FIOS IPv6. As far as I can tell, there's been no new official news since 2013. We're deploying IPv6 at the university I work at, so IPv6 at home is moving from "wish I had it to play with" towards "need to ha

Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 02:32:33PM -0700, Ca By wrote: > Yes, move your business to TWC. TWC has a proven v6 deployment and is > actively engaged in the community, as where vz Fios is not. > > Business only understand $ Yah, cheap bastards :). I've got 50/50 fios right now; TWC can match the do

Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 05:35:35PM -0400, John Peach wrote: > and I wouldn't hold my breath over IPv6; I have to run stunnel so I > can send email from home because they don't even use TLS. Having Hmm, I just recently set up my mail client to use Verizon's smtp servers, and TLS seemed to work

Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:31:54AM +, Mel Beckman wrote: > Just set up the tunnel. It works beautifully. Yeah, I probably will. Shouldn't expose my bluff, but I probably won't switch to business cable, I actually use my upstream 8-/. But I needed to get in one last rant before I went that wa

RE: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

> From: John Peach > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 5:02 AM > > smtps was deprecated years ago and is not implemented in postfix, hence > the need for stunnel. I should have said they don't implement STARTTLS > on either 25 or 587. Oh, ok; I assumed you were talking about a client, not an MTA. Why a

RE: Anyone competent within AT&T Uverse?

Phil if you can send me your full name, address, billing telephone number, contact number, U-Verse BAN if you know it, and what is wrong and for how long, I can escalate this to get immediate attention. Steve -Original Message- From: Phil Karn [mailto:k...@philkarn.net] Sent: Tuesday,

Verizon FIOS IPv6?

So I was curious, has anyone managed to penetrate the black hole that appears to be surrounding any actual details on Verizon FIOS IPv6 deployment? Their last official announcement indicated they would start deploying it in 2012, and clearly that didn't happen. I've been asking on and off for a cou

RE: Verizon FIOS IPv6?

> From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:strei...@cluebyfour.org] > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 6:02 PM > > If you find the answer, you win the prize. Can the prize be the Verizon employees that should have been keeping us in the loop on this in a dunk tank ;)? > I've tried shaking numerous trees (

RE: Verizon FIOS IPv6?

> From: Adam Rothschild [mailto:a...@latency.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 8:10 PM > > Sorry, yes, that is correct: one way to get IPv6 FIOS at the home is > to escalate through your (701/VZB) account team. Hmm, I actually have business FIOS at home (static IP highway robbery ), and have

RE: Verizon FIOS IPv6?

> From: Ian Bowers [mailto:iggd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 5:31 AM > > indication that native IPv6 is starting up, but never hears anything. So I > rock HE like many of you. It works pretty well, and I'm, guessing I get a > lot more address space via HE than VZ would give m

Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted

On 5/29/07, John Curran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : : P.S. I'm not at this NANOG, and it's probably too late to round up presentations, but what might be really helpful to most folks would be presentations which cover some or most aspects (getting transit, address

Re: IPv6 Training?

age contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, i

RE: Security gain from NAT (was: Re: Cool IPv6 Stuff)

DS> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:27:14 -0700 DS> From: David Schwartz [ snipped throughout ] DS> I can give you the root password to a Linux machine running telnetd DS> and sshd. If it's behind NAT/PAT, you will not get into it. Period. DS> DS> I can give you the administrator password to a Window

NANOG 40 Peering BOF XV Meeting Notes now on-line

o the document if you have updates to make. -- // // William B. Norton // Co-Founder and Chief Technical Liaison, Equinix // Skype, Y!IM: williambnorton AIM wbnorton

Re: Mikrotik RouterOS

On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 16:06 -0400, James Jones wrote: > kind ofrouterOS supports MPLS, linux does not It could (unfortunately) be a while before a full linux implementation of MPLS gains enough speed, it's very much out on the fringe of what linux "does daily". This mean that getting enough de

Re: Senderbase is offbase, need some help

On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 16:45 -0400, William Herrin wrote: > Interesting; I see similar results for my address space. Two > addresses, one of which hasn't been attached to a machine for a decade > and the other a virtual IP on a web server where the particular IP > never emits connections. Magnitude

Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 02:13 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > I would see UPNP as being a security risk and prone to denial of > > service attacks when you have torrent clients attempting to grab > every +1 apologies if I've said this here before - UPNP = unstoppable Peek and Poke Gord

Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 11:48 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Take a vacuum cleaner with extensions. Make a set of end connectors A "series of tubes" anyone? I'd also show them the rrd/MRTG graph at the perimeter. Be clear to them about the units. Never miss the chance to ask for more budget

Re: Juniper SRX-210 -- CCC certificate required

On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 10:03 +0200, Elmar K. Bins wrote: > Hello altogether, > > I'm in kind of a pinch currently - I have to get a Juniper > SRX-210 into China. That got the box stuck at import there, > and they demand the CCC certificate from us. > > Unfortunately, Juniper has as yet not been wi

Re: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router

On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 16:35 -0700, Kenny Sallee wrote: > I think if you try to traffic-shape 80Mbps on that platform you'll have > problems. We have a 7200 with NPE-G1 (rate limited at 80Mbps) and it killed > the CPU when the threshold was hit. I imagine that traffic-shaping would do > the same t

Re: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router

On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:54 -0500, Jack Bates wrote: > underpowered router or poor code Agreed. So which is it? :) To be fair, some IOS versions were better than others at it in my limited experience of that chassis. Gord -- I hold you XAP

RE: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router

On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 20:01 -0400, Brandon Kim wrote: > What about purchasing a low-end packetshaper to be used in between? If - 1/ budget is a problem and 2/ you have no BSD knowledge inhouse and 3/ the LAN side is all ethernet you could have a stab at using a PFsense box with two (and str

Re: Web expert on his 'catastrophe' key for the internet

On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:33 +0200, Elmar K. Bins wrote: > One, I do not see the operational relevance of this "news". The real problem is that articles like this DO get considerable attention in the UK - a place where "the internet" has yet to gain true understanding and recognition as a national

RE: sort by agony

My favorite is Detroit to Chicago, via ATL! -Original Message- From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:t...@americafree.tv] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:32 AM To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: sort by agony On Aug 27, 2010, at 10:08 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:

RE: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?

do have a problem with networks selling prioritized access > through the core as that only gives an incentive to congest the network > to create revenue. > +1, because anything other than that Paid-Edge-Prio(#2), to me, smells of theft, fraud, and frankly, B-S. IANAL Gord (#1) on a comletely un

RE: Facebook Issues/Outage in Southeast?

On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:47 -0700, Justin Horstman wrote: > Productivity grinds to a halt as everyone goes onto twitter to talk about > facebook being down I'm hoping (desperately) that someone other than me sees the full irony in this statement? I also have visions of hundreds of techs worl

Re: Online games stealing your bandwidth

On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 07:47 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I don't recall any protocols being standard. > > Plenty of people sell p2p caches but they all work using magic, smoke > and mirrors. > > > Adrian Less smoky is the relatively common practice (at least in Europe) of tech-friendly ISPs r

YES I'VE TRIED MANY VENUES looking for mail admin @ nist.gov

ers. Thanks, and have a great weekend! //jbaltz -- jerry b. altzmanjba...@altzman.com www.jbaltz.com thank you for contributing to the heat death of the universe.

Re: What is good in modular routers these days?

MA> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:45:17 +0200 (CEST) MA> From: Mikael Abrahamsson MA> There are no CPU based routers with proper 10GE forwarding MA> capabilities that I am aware of, closest would be network processor MA> based (which some might argue is a lot of CPUs in some cases, but MA> it's not a

Re: What is good in modular routers these days?

MA> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:31:13 +0200 (CEST) MA> From: Mikael Abrahamsson MA> > With a little creativity, it can _almost_ be done for IPv4. MA> MA> That's most likely a big _almost_. Maybe. And maybe I'm using worst-case synthetic test sets in addition to real routing sets. MA> When someon

Re: Power basics- any resources?

When it's ok to use a C14 to NEMA 5-15R cable and when it's really NOT ok.. On Sep 3, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Darren Bolding wrote: I need to teach an operations group (Systems, Network, Security, IT folks) some basics of power as it applies to the team. Normal things they will see and shoul

Re: Power Analysis/Management Tools

I do the same, but with ganglia. I've noticed that different APCs report power differently (after comparing APC output to BCMS output.) Our newer servers also report power consumption via IPMI: /usr/bin/ ipmitool sdr type "Current". We also graph that via ganglia. -Dave On Oct 26, 200

ICANN/Dotster emergency contacts? (hopefully not too OT)

Greetings, Does anyone have any "emergency" contacts at ICANN? Dotster? I have a couple domains that were erroneously expired this year instead of next. (I have the CC statement and ref # in front of me, to be certain that I'm not hallucinating.) Automated web form failed to send (to different

Re: ICANN/Dotster emergency contacts? (hopefully not too OT)

Thanks, all. I have several responses, and finally got through. Again, sorry for the OT noise. Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 8

CES / TDM-over-PSN equipment recommendations

Greetings all, Does anyone care to share good (or bad, but hopefully good) experiences with specific CES / TDM-over-PSN gear? PSN can be: * (802.1q-tagged|raw) ethernet * MPLS * UDP with the first being preferrable. TIA, Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Br

Re: Ethical DDoS drone network

PWG> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 06:53:49 -0500 PWG> From: Patrick W. Gilmore PWG> But back to your original point, how can you tell it is shit data? AFAIK, RFC 3514 is the only standards document that has addressed this. I have yet to see it implemented. ;-) Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.e

Re: Ethical DDoS drone network

RD> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:54:50 +0800 RD> From: Roland Dobbins RD> AUPs are a big issue, here.. And AUPs [theoretically] set forth definitions. Of course, there exist colo providers with "unlimited 10 Gbps bandwidth" whose AUPs read "do not use 'too much' bandwith or we will get angry", thus

RE: Ethical DDoS drone network

TAB> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:54:06 -0500 TAB> From: "BATTLES, TIMOTHY A (TIM), ATTLABS" TAB> assuming your somewhat scaled, I would think this could all be done TAB> in the lab. And end up with a network that works in the lab. :-) - bw * delay - effects of flow caching, where applicable - jitte

Re: Ethical DDoS drone network

JL> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:54:24 -0500 JL> From: Jeffrey Lyon JL> FWIW, I'm primarily concerned about testing PPS loads and not brute JL> force bandwidth. Which underscores my point: bps with minimally-sized packets is even higher pps than bps with "normal"-sized packets, for any non-minimal

Re: question about BGP default routing

KC> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:05:48 -0600 KC> From: Kai Chen KC> is this router using a default routing for all the other KC> destinations? Either that: router> sh ip route 0.0.0.0 Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet or partial tables with no default: router> sh ip rou

Re: question about BGP default routing

KC> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:52:12 -0600 KC> From: Kai Chen KC> Will this default route 0.0.0.0/0 be exporting to AS-level KC> neighbors? You can have it exported, or you can have it not exported. It depends how the route is known (eBGP? OSPF? static?) and what you set BGP to redistribute. Edd

Re: question about BGP default routing

cK> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:40:16 -0500 (EST) cK> From: chloe K cK> Why it needs default routes when running BGP? If you have a full table, you do not need default. It's even desirable to drop road-to-nowhere packets inside your network, before they clog up your connections. However, consider

Re: Ethical DDoS drone network

RD> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:50:46 +0800 RD> From: Roland Dobbins RD> > I've seen _many_ routing problems appear in large WANs that simply RD> > can't be replicated with fewer than a hundred or even a thousand RD> > routers. RD> Users can simulate many of these conditions themselves using various

Re: Ethical DDoS drone network

I propose that we create two Internets. One can be the "testing" Internet, and the other can be "production". To ensure that both receive adequate treatment, they can trade places every few days. If something breaks, it can be moved from "production" to "testing". The detection of hyperbole, sa

Re: Ethical DDoS drone network

RD> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:48:16 +0800 RD> From: Roland Dobbins RD> When one has a network/system in which the basic security BCPs RD> haven't been implemented, it makes little sense to expend scarce RD> resources testing when those resources could be better-employed RD> hardening and increasing

Re: Anyone notice strange announcements for 174.128.31.0/24

MSA> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:48:42 + MSA> From: Majdi S. Abbas MSA> More seriously, this is indeed reachability research. Try emailing MSA> the AS 3130 contacts although I'd imagine Randy will see this. Why not do this in a lab instead? ;-) Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everqu

<    1   2   3   4   >