d pressing issue. It seems
to be resolved at this point, but we have not yet heard from Qwest what the
actual problem was.
This was with sites in Northeast Ohio and the Chicago area connecting to
servers in New York and LA for what it's worth.
------
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On No
wrong and when
it was actually fixed though.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Nov 9, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Preston Parcell wrote:
> What was the timeframe for your issues? Just curious since we saw some
> strangeness last night.
>
>
> Preston
>
>
>
t took some effort.
tl;dr version: Working in an office provides structure that you may depend on
without realizing it. Be prepared to replicate as much of that structure as
needed to remain productive and not turn in to a slob.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Dec 5, 2011,
Obviously every platform worth
using has ping built in.
------
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Dec 22, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> The goal of what I am doing is to test some network convergence impact
> in a lab with two PCs with windows (Can't run Linux, it would b
it
may be something outside of my ISP's control. On the other hand if things
start dragging on my home connection or anywhere else that I know I can expect
a certain result speedtest.net is usually my first stop.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Dec 25, 2011, at 9:43 PM, Gran
I was seeing the same problem, but it seems to be working now.
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> works for me
>
>
e day, the content is simply
activated, you get the key, your PC decrypts it, and you go play.
On a well designed digital distribution system the release second traffic spike
should be a lot less than you'd think.
------
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Jan 27, 2012, at 5:35 AM, Te
I don't know if the box uses any different settings, but using the Windows
client on my PC with quality maxed just now I saw a consistent 5.35mbit/sec
during action sequences and fast-paced cutscenes, much less of course in menus
and such.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On J
ouble the audio bandwidth in the same
data bandwidth (64kbit/sec/stream) as G.711.
If your carrier is forcing G.729 or GSM, they're a joke.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On May 2, 2012, at 15:52, Eric Wieling wrote:
>
> I doubt the g729 or GSM codecs used by VoIP and Cell phones can
mparison.
The cellular world works with less bandwidth and more loss than the VoIP world
usually deals with, so while us VoIP guys sometimes use their codecs (GSM for
example) they don't tend to bother with ours. That said, the article you link
is talking about the same sort o
ia.org/wiki/Nationwide_Wireless_Priority_Service
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Emergency_Telecommunications_Service
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
ditional landline. If they don't
have VoIP or it's not working for some reason, everything becomes a mobile call.
Again not arguing one side or another, just that there's enough mobile usage
that it would seem reasonable either way.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
mpletion problems, it
seems that GETS works well and WPS works until the cells get completely flooded
as happened during the '09 Inauguration.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
$random_computer exceeds the
perceived risk, they'll do it if they can.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:08, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> For those of us who have not kept up with every latest feature that Cisco
> rolls out across all its platforms, can someone explain this new service? Is
> it like Windows update, where Cisco will auto-update your router s/w and
> thereby brick
On Jul 5, 2012, at 11:24, Joe Greco wrote:
> And what happens when your *cough* "router" isn't actually on the
> Internet? How can it be managed and upgraded on a regular old network?
If there is no internet connection, you get a very limited page that's
apparently only really good to get you b
On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:42, Jon Lewis wrote:
> Routers are sometimes used on networks that don't have internet connectivity
> [by design]. This seems amazingly short-sighted for a company that's been
> around selling routing gear as long as cisco.
Not to defend Cisco's idiotic decision, but in t
On Jul 13, 2012, at 16:02, Grant Ridder wrote:
> The admins say they are working on a content filter system. All you really
> should have to do if do keyword filtering in mailman. I have this setup on
> a maillist that i manage.
How well would that actually work against what seems to be a bored
ng it wrong and should rethink your
business model. Wireless carriers get a bit more leeway due to spectrum
limitations, but even there a 5GB cap is barely reasonable for an entry level
offering.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
ue unlimited, but are not
allowed to tether. The previous unlimited but throttled to 2G after X amount
of transfer plans remain available for those who tether.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
ally irrelevant for anyone who's not at the scale to
be dealing directly with Tier 1 carriers. Capacity costs money, but once it's
there utilization is nothing.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
nd messages directly while still stopping or minimizing the ability
of the thousands of zombies sharing an ISP with you from doing the same the
world would love to hear it.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
rea where they're more likely to be found. The only
"bypass" is to go back to using their own machines or compromised equipment on
higher-grade connections.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
all messages on that port
would defeat the purpose.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
etailed analysis of some kind and sees that I'm also
checking my email from the same IP that's sending these messages, I don't know,
but they are not just blocking anything coming in from a random cable IP. I'll
bet it raises the "spam likelihood" or whatever as it probably should, but it's
not a total block.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
ming back around to the already raised point about if we're going to have to
change a lot of things, why not just put that effort in to doing it right with
IPv6 rather than trying to keep address conservation via DNAT alive?
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
get the content.
In the case of a security alert, I could see it being used if the destination
is in fact an example of an attack site to prevent someone from inadvertently
clicking the link and getting infected.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
" error, so the practical result is the same.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
unwanted files, like advertisements
or a malware. The method is directly change all 'http' to 'hxxp' in specific
uncompressed .exe or .swf files with a hex editor.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
g iOS 4.1.2) all client->server DHCP was broadcast, as well as
server->client NACKs. Server->client offers and ACKs were unicast.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
>
> Maybe because he has 130 sites and 130 truck rolls is not cheap. Also
> company policy says no.
>
>
You are correct that deploying to a number of sites isn't cheap, but the
actual relevant question is how does this cost compare to the cost
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> Jonathan stated that they have health data on the network and only company
> issued devices are allowed. I would suggest to him that he inventory the
> equipment via MAC address (I'm guessing that it's mostly standard issue
> stuff that would
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:44 PM, George Herbert wrote:
> This solution - the "don't care" solution - almost fails the
> negligence test for certain security regimes including PCI (credit
> cards) and possibly SOX for retail data locations (and HIPPA for
> hospitals / medical locations, etc).
>
Of
I have had this same behavior at my UniFi pilot site. What I discovered in
my case was a combination of bad behaviors in both the UniFi unit and
Android.
Long story short Android really wants to hang on to a WiFi signal as long
as it can and does not seemingly scan for other signals when connecte
34 matches
Mail list logo
