rown-up with real work to do.
Drive slow,
Paul
it ain't gonna replace TCP/IP, DNS,
or IP addresses anytime soon. :-)
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
x27;em, right? :-)
>
Compare & contrast: There is still large-scale resistance (for lack of
a better term) to IPv6 deployment, so what chance does deployment of
Named Data-Networking stand? :-)
- - ferg
> On September 5, 2014 10:27:18 AM EDT, Paul Ferguson
> wrote:
>
> On 9/
ning DNS
>>> /and Google/ into IP in place of, y'know, IP addresses. ]
>>>
>>> Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
>>> j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think
>>> RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 9/5/2014 12:49 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:38:13 -0700, Paul Ferguson said:
>> The principle questions still stand unanswered:
>>
>> What is the motivation for this? What do you gain? Does it
Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:28:45 +
From: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk
To: i...@ietf.org
http://blog.bimajority.org/2014/09/05/the-network-nightmare-that-ate-my-week/
Interesting scaling concerns...
Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
[end]
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Pub
Later,
I think it requires 5.7G of free space on the device -- but the download
is not that big.
On 9/18/2014 午前 11:04, JoeSox wrote:
Grant,
Do you have a reference? Someone just told me it is more around 5GB.
--
Later, Joe
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Grant Ridder
wrote:
For those
First time I'm seeing it, and I've been a Cogent client for quite a while.
Have you tried getting in touch with their NOC yet? They're one of the
most responsive in the industry.
On 10/3/2014 午前 01:03, ryanL wrote:
hi. relatively new cogent customer. is what i've stated in my subject line
kin
I'm allocating /64s in /56 boundaries per customer.
Allows me to give the client more should they need it without fuss.
On 10/9/2014 午前 10:18, Erik Sundberg wrote:
I am planning out our IPv6 deployment right now and I am trying to figure out
our default allocation for customer LAN blocks. So w
I've been using /36s per location, but hm -- great question.
How easy is it to get a larger allocation anyway? In RIPE, i.e: you just
ask and get a /29 with no questions asked.
On 10/9/2014 午後 11:31, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Selection of a default prefix is easy. Here are the steps.
4. Keeping
Does it actually persist to your destination?
Loss in transit paths is simply ICMP de-prioritization unless it's
losing packets all the way to the last hop.
On 10/23/2014 午後 01:18, Javier J wrote:
Anyone else notice this?
Or is this an AWS issue in APAC that hasn't been reported yet?
AU-NY(
e, directed to
abuse@ the main domain for that ISP.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5070.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5965.txt
--
Paul W Bennett
I've used the first one, and hacked on the second.
WANGuard, when deployed properly, works amazingly well.
ddosmon is only useful if you have netflow v5 flows (or sflow that can
get converted to nfv5), but also works well when coupled with exabgp /
openbgpd.
I added some per ip limiting / ex
I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
justification these days, sadly.
Good luck nonetheless.
On 11/10/2014 午後 11:00, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
Hey,
VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already a
Hey,
If anyone from the routing / peering team of Internode / iiNet happens
to frequent this list, could you reach me off-list?
I've been having routing problems with my peering session to you for a
few months already, and haven't been able to get a response off the
helpdesk.
Thanks, and s
GNS3, while unofficial, is what I'd recommend for that.
On 11/11/2014 午後 11:59, Colton Conor wrote:
Does CBT or any of these other subscription based learning courses include
a Cisco IOS simulator so we don't have to buy a Cisco lab or equipment?
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Scott Morris wr
Agree, cuustomer service is really not upto par these days.
All my other carriers do better from that standpoint, but the network
performance isn't all that bad.
Just pray that nothing breaks...
On 11/13/2014 午前 08:22, Christopher Nielsen wrote:
We had circuits with Abovenet in San Jose and
There's another option called the Noction IRP.
I've been told that it's a cheaper FCP replacement.
On 11/17/2014 午前 12:42, Phil Bedard wrote:
Didn't Avaya completely drop the old Route Science line at this point?
Internap still sells their FCP appliance which does similar things and of
course
ly towards single
badguy / single incident). With that power comes greater complexity,
though. I'll have to look at Net::Abuse::Utils since that's the first
I've ever heard of it and I don't know what it can do. If it can't
make IODEF, I'm a capable Perl programmer, so I can take a look, but
no promises.
--
Paul W Bennett
> Don't forget IETF RFC 5970 "IODEF"
Sorry, that's 5070, not 5970. Slip of the finger.
--
Paul W Bennett
work abuse should be *EASY*. Say it with me ... *EASY*.
No promises, at this stage, but I thought some of you would like to
know that this project is at least in the pre-planning stages.
--
Paul W Bennett
WANguard from andrisoft has worked well on this for us.
It supports flow telemetry and mirrored ports both (We use flows
strictly), and does what it says it does.
No complaints.
On 11/21/2014 午後 12:00, Robert Duffy wrote:
I've been using NTOP for couple of years. I'm mostly looking for some
ticle is here:
http://www.channel4.com/news/spy-cable-revealed-how-telecoms-firm-worked-with-gchq
My question is this: Do willful actions such as these violate peering,
transit, and/or exchange agreements in any way?
Thanks,
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Ke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/21/2014 7:07 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
> Paul Ferguson writes:
>
>> I'll apologize up front if this offends anyone's sensitivities as
>> to what is relevant for list conversation... but one sentence in
&g
,
- - ferg
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message- From: NANOG
> [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ferguson Sent:
> Friday, November 21, 2014 7:59 AM To: NANOG Subject: Transit,
> Exchange Point Agreements, and Acceptable Use?
>
> I'll apologize
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Paul Bennett wrote:
> Inspired by this thread (and other recent similar ones about how hard
> it is to report abuse in the right format to the right people), I've
> decided I'm going to start work on [a] Perl module
Well ... preliminary grou
No problem here in Los Angeles either, but seeing a lone route through
Atrato only.
flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin
*>194.71.107.0/24 <> 100 0 3491 5580 39138 22351 2.207
51040 i
* 194.71.107.0/24 <> 100 0 174 5580 39138
Do these people never check what exactly they end up originating
outbound due to a config change, if that's really the case?
On 11/30/2014 午後 11:24, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
"Simon" == Simon Leinen writes:
Simon> Some suspicious paths I'm seeing right now:
Simon> 133439 5
S
Share them anyway? Juniper's certs have enough demand as well :)
On 12/5/2014 午前 05:13, Eric Litvin wrote:
have some juniper but not cisco.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Bacon Zombie wrote:
Anybody got codes valid for December?
On 14 Nov 2014 18:07, "Wakefield, Thad M."
wrote:
Since th
Just been using the .net version of our company domain for
router/interface IPs.
Also own the AS.com/net and .as though, primarily to not get
squatted on.
On 12/10/2014 午前 09:30, Keefe John wrote:
I've been seeing more and more carriers(and even small ISPs) using
as.net as their domain f
Tons of such companies exist; BlackLotus/Staminus/Prolexic/Voxility to
name a few within the US.
Service provided is usually based on proprietary algorithms that may or
may not do what you want it to do, though.
On 12/11/2014 10:39 AM, Javier J wrote:
What about DDOS protection as a service?
Apologies if you are on multiple lists and see multiple copies of this
email.
-
The next OARC Spring Workshop will take place in Amsterdam on May 9th
and 10th, the weekend before RIPE70. OARC is requesting proposals for
presentations, with a preference for DDoS attack reports and mit
While it indeed is true that attacks up to 600 gbit/s (If OVH and
CloudFlare's data is to be believed) have been known to happen in the
wild, it's very unlikely that you need to mitigate anything close.
The average attack is usually around the 10g mark (That too barely) --
so even solutions th
ur network. Hibernia
Networks blocks them for us.
Ammar
On 11 Jan 2015, at 8:37 am, Paul S. wrote:
While it indeed is true that attacks up to 600 gbit/s (If OVH and CloudFlare's
data is to be believed) have been known to happen in the wild, it's very
unlikely that you need to mitigate anyth
Very true.
Last year's Atrato outages in NY come to mind on this one.
On 1/11/2015 午後 01:51, Roland Dobbins wrote:
On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Paul S. wrote:
Obviously, concerns are different if you're an enterprise that's a DDoS magnet
-- but for general service pr
There's the Cisco xRV too, should be decent for playing around with.
On 1/12/2015 午前 12:08, Dave Bell wrote:
Maybe try the Cisco CSR1000v. In the trial mode it won't give you a
decent throughput, but should have all features enabled.
On 11 January 2015 at 15:02, Ammar Zuberi wrote:
I’m stuck
Like Mike mentioned, the feature list in RouterOS is nothing short of
impressive -- problem is that pretty much everything in there is
inherently buggy.
That and one hell of a painful syntax-schema to work with too.
On 1/27/2015 午前 10:57, Tony Wicks wrote:
And the solution to this issue is -
Anyone aware of any dpdk enabled solutions in the software routing space
that doesn't cost an arm and a leg?
vMX certainly does.
On 1/27/2015 午後 04:33, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
Hello!
Looks like somebody want to build Linux soft router!) Nice idea for
routing 10-30 GBps. I route about 5+ Gbps in
That's the problem though.
Everyone has presentations for the most part, very few actual tools that
end users can just use exist.
On 1/28/2015 午後 08:02, Robert Bays wrote:
On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Jim Shankland wrote:
My expertise, such as it ever was, is a bit stale at this point, and
groups of users to different VLANs
(all on a single SSID), just different username/password to connect.
Signal penetration is the best that I have ever seen, and makes the Cisco
Aironet enterprise stuff look really really silly.
paul
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 4:46 AM, Eduardo Schoed
That has been my experience as well (only from the RF side) and I would
believe this was a design choice. The ISP usually wants to keep control
over the firmware versions of the CM for various technical/support reasons
versus having consumers mess with the firmware.
Paul
On Wednesday, January
idea to use
UBNT but it definitely turned me off of their product after digging into their
gear...
Again as someone pointed out, for residential and perhaps SOHO applications it
can probably work well - and in my opinion it's priced for that market.
Paul
-Original Message-
F
and segregation fairly trivial (for non-trivial values of
trivial :-)).
paul
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Tyler Mills wrote:
>
> Most of the issues are related to firmware. Most of my UBNT experience was
> with the UAP-Pro and the UAP-AC, and it wasn't a good experience.
&
It was all users getting randomly disconnected ... the AP's stayed online but
the traffic would completely halt for 15-30 seconds at a time. Their
association with the AP would stay in tact ....
Paul
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
Open – it was just for a trade show setting .. few years ago ….
Thanks,
Paul
From: Mike Lyon [mailto:mike.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:07 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: Mike Hammett; NANOG
Subject: RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
Just curious, were
]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 6:49 AM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: 'Nathan Anderson'; 'A MEKKAOUI'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: cable modem firmware upgrade
"Paul Stewart" writes:
> That has been my experience as well (only from the RF side) and I would
> believe
Cisco. Some of the Cisco folk
that I know think that that is a point in favour of Cisco, as it adds to job
security :-)
paul
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Edwards, Jermaine wrote:
>
> Ruckus should work fine for you. You need to have a controller and need a
> good RF
anything ever again.
paul
> On Feb 1, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Dennis Bohn wrote:
>
> We are substantially larger and use Aruba, but I am wondering why no one
> has mentioned Meraki (now cisco-meraki). We tried one of their give-away
> aps and it seemed fine, with the 'cl
isn't pnap a direct vz customer either way? I know it's in the DFW blend
which we have, not sure about NY.
It shouldn't be out of their ability to complain.
On 2/4/2015 午後 01:35, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Charles Gagnon wrote:
Anyone from VZ FiOS network on t
ing INSIDE your network. Not just your WAN traffic, which would be bad
enough.
paul
contents I can see ….”
With Ruckus (or almost any other) gear, I have to either open up a hole through
my firewall or grab the packet traces and send them to the tech folk. They
don’t have uncontrolled access to my internal traffic out of the box.
paul
> On Feb 4, 2015, at 8:31 AM,
As a current Cogent customer, my experience on the service side of
things is similar.
Very responsive (I called on a Sunday and had someone with good enough
clue + router access pick up instantly.)
NOC is competent, and my sales guys (I've had two so far) are not pushy
at all. I don't have a
n't want to take the time to check. You would need to capture
> the MD5 from a known good image, and watch for changes.
>
- --
Paul Ferguson
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
You might want to check out Console by IIX (www.iix.net).
They are re-shaping peering automation with SDN.
Drive Slow,
Paul WALL
On 9/21/15, Erik Sundberg wrote:
> Just wondering how far everyone is going on filtering BGP sessions when
> peering with other content providers and carrier
+1, this is the only sensible advice here.
NSPs actually do seem to care about not letting things like these happen.
On 2015/09/29 01:24 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At 23:11 28/09/2015 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
Start announcing their prefixes?
Contact the upstreams of AS20115 - Cogent, Leve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 9/30/2015 8:25 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Guessing no one cares.
Darwinism.
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
Anyone in a network administrator position struggling with IPv6 (and not
willing to fix that out of their own initiative) has no business running
any network.
You should hire better staff.
On 10/13/2015 06:56 PM, Max Tulyev wrote:
On our network, we had to spent times more money in people tha
Their products seem to be named 'MPC' or 'ASR,' reminds me of J and C
respectively.
Very unique way of naming things, I must say.
On 10/15/2015 06:08 AM, rdrake wrote:
Does anyone have experience running Packetfront hardware in a
production network? We've looked at a few and they seem to be p
Hey!
New message, please read <http://throughaglassdarkly.net/wind.php?y>
Paul Rolland
Hey!
New message, please read <http://funezy.com/made.php?hwx>
Paul Rolland
Hey!
New message, please read <http://takestockinyourlife.com/youth.php?n7pb>
Paul Rolland
Hey!
New message, please read <http://bambooco.ru/life.php?gasg>
Paul Ferguson
Hey!
New message, please read <http://africancichlidphotos.com/behind.php?wvwqc>
Paul Stewart
Hi,
Can someone from the moderator team take a look?
This has been going on for a while.
Be careful in your search for RATs -- in the security world it also stands for
Remote Access Trojan. :-)
- ferg
On October 29, 2015 3:06:23 PM EDT, Jesse McGraw wrote:
>Historically there was RAT (Router Audit Tool). You'll have to do some
>
>googling to see where it's hosted now and whether
Tom,
Could you expand further on this?
On 11/25/2015 07:29 AM, Tom Hill wrote:
And in relation to Brocade: I'd feel very uncomfortable throwing any
*new* money at MLXe, CER or CES. Strategy for those families seems to
have fallen off of a cliff.
Hey folks.
Looking for feedback from actual customers on SevOne for network monitoring
. anyone using them and willing to share thoughts online/offline?
They have an appealing system for network monitoring and considering it as a
replacement to Solarwinds.
Cheers,
Paul
ere peering doesn't happen.
going to nanog and yelling about peering by saying that you're a
victim isn't a mutual benefit last i checked. their lack of peering
doesn't demand another moment of our attention. choose wisely.
Drive slow,
Paul WALL
It is worth noting that HE indeed provides the full view, it's the other
side that has an issue.
(Since HE isn't really a tier 1, their transit relationships with Telia
and other carriers "save" them)
Cogent -> HE dies with unreachable on the first hop though, and that's
an issue for Cogent
11:43 AM, Paul S. wrote:
It is worth noting that HE indeed provides the full view, it's the
other side that has an issue.
(Since HE isn't really a tier 1, their transit relationships with
Telia and other carriers "save" them)
Cogent -> HE dies with unreachable on the fi
RIPE stats also takes a feed similarly.
On 12/9/2015 01:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:
Hi,
For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous
Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS
in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operat
I recommend them for everything other than the quality of their remote
hands. They could do with some improvements in this department.
We have space at Cologix Dallas (within Infomart), and it's all fine. We
run our own ASN too though, so no idea on the bandwidth side of things.
On 12/15/2015
I'm not sure if these URLs are supposed to resolve `-`
On 1/1/2016 05:51 PM, mate csaba wrote:
On 01/01/2016 09:40 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
opinions?
yep. do not click on strange urls.
never. and disable flash! and activate firewall.
this one http://fun.nop.hu/cisco-asa.jpg
or this one http:
Definitely there is - don't have any names handy but there were a few companies
at NANOG Montreal that chased me down re: leasing IP space (and of course
selling).
Paul
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Javier J
Sent: Tuesday, January 5,
r "normal" network issues
>> then we would of heard of injuries before.
>
> I think that line refers to drone operators ...
>
- --
Paul Ferguson
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B
>> I would kill for a 24-port 10GbE Juniper switch for ~$2,500. You
can't even get a 24-port 1GbE for that.
EX4200s are abundant for much less in Ebay (for the 24port 1g requirement).
In the 10G space though, indeed, Juniper is expensive.
On 1/30/2016 05:03 PM, Jonas Bjork wrote:
Dear Mr. Car
ortunately it is hard to simultaneously allow legitimate
unauthenticated use without allowing abusive route objects. Which is
why there is a lot of head-scratching here; I don't have an answer to
that one.
Paul.
Apologies for a post as a non-expert, but it was suggested that I see if
any Verizon techs are reading here and to solicit opinions on fixing a
peculiar problem.
I noticed about a month ago that all upload traffic from my home router
(Fios) to a specific work machine was extremely slow. I firs
Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Paul Paukstelis
mailto:shocksofmig...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Apologies for a post as a non-expert, but it was suggested that I
see if any Verizon techs are reading here and to solicit opinions
on fixing a peculiar problem.
I noticed about a mon
DO's SG range is allocated out of a single /64 (I think?) and Google
basically asks for captcha on every single request over IPv6. :(
We're using it as a corporate vpn.
On 3/1/2016 01:49 AM, Keenan Tims wrote:
FWIW I have seen the captchas more often on IPv6 both from home and the office
than
You too ? I gave up ... after calling their local offices, their toll free
number, emails, phone calls, etc.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:34 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Citrix Sales Reps?
I
All 6 of my upstreams (Most of them tier 1s, except Internap which is a
tier 3?) have cooperated just fine in blocking problematic IPs if needed
in emergencies.
I did not have to argue.
On 3/18/2015 午後 02:26, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 18/Mar/15 04:13, Roland Dobbins wrote:
Also, asking your u
On 3/18/2015 午後 02:44, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 18/Mar/15 07:31, Paul S. wrote:
All 6 of my upstreams (Most of them tier 1s, except Internap which is
a tier 3?) have cooperated just fine in blocking problematic IPs if
needed in emergencies.
In the data plane for the link facing you, or through
+1, I've had good luck with this as well.
My experiences pretty much mirror yours, NOC says no, had to ask my SE
to take care of it.
Didn't have any issues after.
On 3/23/2015 午後 11:55, Ca By wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Justin M. Streiner
wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Ca By wrote:
Same here. These Indosat guys can't seem to catch a break =/
On 3/26/2015 午後 11:43, Peter Rocca wrote:
We just received a similar alert from bgpmon - part of 108.168.0.0/17 is being
advertised as /20's - although we're still listed as the origin. We are 40788.
108.168.64.0/20 4795 4795 4761 9
Do you have data on '100% of the traffic' being bad?
I happen to have a large Chinese clientbase, and this is not the case on
my network.
On 4/2/2015 午後 04:35, Colin Johnston wrote:
or ignore/block russia and north korea and china network blocks
takes away 5% of network ranges for memory head
:
On 2 Apr 2015, at 08:40, Paul S. wrote:
Do you have data on '100% of the traffic' being bad?
as a example anything in 163data.com.cn is bad
Colin
I happen to have a large Chinese clientbase, and this is not the case on my
network.
On 4/2/2015 午後 04:35, Colin Johnston wrote:
David Barroso's (Spotify) SDN Internet Router [0] comes to mind.
0 - https://github.com/dbarrosop/sir
On 4/2/2015 午後 07:47, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
Filtering countries is a bad idea, but it is probably possible to create
filters so 99% of your actual traffic is handled by a relatively small
subs
contacts of
whom many of them didn't know the mask had changed in the first place.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Bill Woodcock
Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2015 10:36 PM
To: Mike Hammett
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Small IX IP Blocks
>
there's something wiggy and everyone is being treated as a DMARC
> encumbered sender.
>
>
I'm on a gazillion lists, and this is the only one which seems to have
this particularly annoying problem.
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 5/7/2015 7:23 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> I'm on a gazillion lists, and this is the only one which seems to
> have this particularly annoying problem.
And fixed!
Apologies for the noise.
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
PGP Pu
Hi guys,
We're shortly going to be getting some 10G SANs, and I was wondering
what people were using as SAN switches for 10G SANs.
It is my understanding that low buffer sizes make most 'normal' 10G
ethernet switches unsuitable for the job.
We're pretty much an exclusive Juniper shop, but a
e in So Cal.
fuel
YOUTH ENGAGEMENT
Paul Lam | Network Administrator
T: +1(613) 224-6738 x257 | M:
www.fuelyouth.com<http://www.fuelyouth.com>
I've observed past behaviour of image and page content "optimization" (i.e.
> minifying, recompression) that causes problems for a site over this type of
> connection when using plaintext.
>
> M.
>
> Original Message
> From: Paul Lam
> Sent: Tues
Problem in this space is, none of the products offered are genuinely
affordable.
When your route optimization software costs more monthly than yet
another link to yet another tier one provider... `-`
On 5/16/2015 午前 12:27, Rafael Possamai wrote:
Internap also has a product called MIRO, altho
Apologies if you are on multiple lists and see multiple copies of this
email.
-
The next DNS-OARC Fall Workshop will take place in Montreal on Oct 3rd
and 4th, the weekend before NANOG65. DNS-OARC is requesting proposals
for presentations, with a preference for DNSSEC work. We are
I hear the Supreme Court just ruled IPv6 legal in all states...
What does this mean for the backward people who have been steadily
resisting deploying the current version of the Internet Protocol?
Drive Slow,
Paul
fore they fully deployed).
The interesting part was that the development consisted of 4400 active users
the last time I heard but the bandwidth to upstream provider was still only a
single GigE and was not hitting serious saturation levels most of the time.
Paul
-Original Message--
>>
>>
>>
- --
>> TTFN, patrick
>>
>>> On Jul 08, 2015, at 10:06 , Marshall Eubanks
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/08/us-ual-flights-idUSKCN0PI1
IX20150708
>>>
>>>
>>>
tivity for various applications. We fixed the router."
https://twitter.com/barronstechblog/status/618816643821633536
- - ferg
On 7/8/2015 9:36 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> All completely coincidental networking issues, not related to
> anything malicious.
>
> - ferg
>
>
&g
501 - 600 of 1420 matches
Mail list logo
