-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 9/5/2014 7:35 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> "Interface" sure. > > But the dangers of replacing actual /addresses/ with things which > are not is sufficiently well understood that even Van Jacobson > ought to know about 'em, right? :-) > Compare & contrast: There is still large-scale resistance (for lack of a better term) to IPv6 deployment, so what chance does deployment of Named Data-Networking stand? :-) - - ferg > On September 5, 2014 10:27:18 AM EDT, Paul Ferguson > <fergdawgs...@mykolab.com> wrote: > > On 9/5/2014 7:16 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > How many Youtube subject tags will fit in *your* routers' TCAM? > > http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/09/04/2156232/ucla-cisco-more-launch-consortium-to-replace-tcpip > > [ Can someone convince me this isn't the biggest troll in the > history of the internet? Cause it sounds like shoehorning DNS /and > Google/ into IP in place of, y'know, IP addresses. ] > > > I didn't read it that way exactly, especially in light of this not > in the Wikipedia article: > > "Application-layer designs have also been proposed for deploying a > content-centric interface. This has benefits such as easier > deployment, backwards compatibility and more flexible delivery > support." > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Named_data_networking > > It's an interesting concept, but it ain't gonna replace TCP/IP, > DNS, or IP addresses anytime soon. :-) > > - ferg > > > > -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my > brevity. - -- Paul Ferguson VP Threat Intelligence, IID PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlQJy0gACgkQKJasdVTchbIVGQEAmPM5XTV9er8vtivwsPncz8x4 rDxyKiXDvD08CeqRN/cBANKT4Da86IryizcPp7UTknguI6N3yrAdBYYhmzVInZH8 =wVf9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
