On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Check out: http://www.bcp38.info
Right on. :-)
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
t; representative from Capital One but after leaving several voice mails I have
>> yet to get a call back.
>>
>> Thank you in advance for anyone's assistance,
>>
>> John Caffery
>> Information Technology Consultant
>> Louisiana Optical Network Initiative - LONI
>> O 225.578.7263
>> C 225.252.3046
>> www.loni.org<http://www.loni.org/>
>>
>>
>
>
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
Hang on -- University of New Orleans's AS is 23666?
Looks like "SISTELINDO-AS-ID PT Sistelindo Mitralintas":
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=as23666
?
- ferg
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> John,
>
> Can you provide the prefi
In the original message, he said 23666
- ferg
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM, David Walker wrote:
> On 03/05/2013, John D Caffery wrote:
>> The UNO AS number is 23666 ...
>
> 26333 right?
>
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
Ya think? :-)
- ferg
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:45 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 02 May 2013 17:05:36 -0700, Paul Ferguson said:
>> In the original message, he said 23666
>
> But 'whois as23666' points at Indonesia, not Louisiana, so I suspect
> some transcription errors
I'll take a guess they are back logged - they have been working on our traffic
stats since a week before that posting made it to nanog list
--- Sent via IPhone
On 2011-12-16, at 9:16 AM, "Dennis Burgess" wrote:
> Same here.
>
> ---
> Den
a different way, if a customer is getting 20X1 Internet service
and the speedtest shows 17 X 0.8 then case closed - if they are getting a
speedtest result of 5 X 0.5 then our helpdesk will take a further look -
this is really in rough terms...
Paul
-Original Message-
From: jacob
I second The SSL Store (http://www.thesslstore.com/)
--
Paul Norton
Systems Administrator
Neoverve - www.neoverve.com
Neoverve Blog - http://blog.neoverve.com/
On 1/6/2012 7:31 AM, Ken A wrote:
theSSLstore has good reseller pricing on a variety of certs.
~ $10 domain validated rapidssl certs
George,
We appreciate your sponsorship but using the NANOG mailing list to
sell your colo is inappropriate.
Best Regards,
Paul
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:20 PM, George Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> If folks are having colo. issues please take a look at Telx.
> We will be in San Diego as well.
&g
SV1 or SV5 (San Jose) DC's - this is not mandatory,
we're open for suggestions
If you feel your company measures up or is a cut above the rest, please get in
touch with us to discuss the specific details.
Cheers
Paul
Hey folks. just curious what people are using for automating updates to
Linux boxes?
Today, we manually do YUM updates to all the CentOS servers . just an
example but a good one. I have heard there are some open source solutions
similar to that of Red Hat Network?
Cheers,
Paul
Awesome! I remember someone telling me about this before and couldn't
remember the name til now...
Cheers,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Ankers [mailto:md1...@md1clv.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:08 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Subject: Re: Linux Centralized Administr
On 01/12/2012 03:51 PM, chaim.rie...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/12/2012 4:43 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Paul Stewart
wrote:
Today, we manually do YUM updates to all the CentOS servers . just an
example but a good one. I have heard there are some open source
On 01/12/2012 03:51 PM, chaim.rie...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/12/2012 4:43 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Paul Stewart
wrote:
Today, we manually do YUM updates to all the CentOS servers . just an
example but a good one. I have heard there are some open source
On 01/19/2012 12:41 PM, Ryan Gelobter wrote:
The megaupload.com domain was seized today, has anyone noticed significant
drops in network traffic as a result?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/78786408/Mega-Indictment
http://techland.time.com/2012/01/19/feds-shut-down-megaupload-com-file-sharing-website/
For us (AS11666), about 3-4% of total traffic typically
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Paul Graydon [mailto:p...@paulgraydon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:27 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Megaupload.com seized
On 01/19/2012 12:41 PM, Ryan Gelobter wrote:
>
her each take-down
should apply to just an individual user's link to a file or whether the
file itself should be removed. That could be different from
circumstance to circumstance.
Paul
We really like Lantronix .. use them a lot.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Ray Soucy [mailto:r...@maine.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 11:09 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Console Server Recommendation
What are people using for console servers these days? We've historically
used re
olks using today and your experiences?
Thanks,
Paul
e same time.
You could try Cogent, AT&T, or Savvis, though they'll probably fill up
now that I've mentioned it.
Drive Slow (like a download going over Comcast-GBLX),
Paul Wall
withdrawals and it would be useful to have a peek and
> see if any such event concerning our prefix/as was seen anywhere.
RIPE's RIS does this - http://ris.ripe.net
Paul.
t;> *huge* misconception about the operational status of IPv6 (imho).
>>
>> Steve
>
> By that definition, IPv4 is non-operational.
>
> You can break anything if you try hard enough.
This being well demonstrated by most of the "Internet" access provided
by hotels, for example.
--
Paul
toring (not
sure how good his monitoring was, though.)
Paul
s
only in theory. Just having a grasp of that makes all the world of
difference when it comes to troubleshooting. Start at layer 1 and work
upwards (unless you're able to make appropriate intuitive leaps.) Is it
physically connected? Are the link lights flashing? Can traffic route to
it, etc. etc.
Paul
On 02/17/2012 04:29 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:50:11PM -1000, Paul Graydon
wrote:
At the same time, it's shocking how many network people I come across
with no real grasp of even what OSI means by each layer, even if it's
only in the
rting at which point you can see the
pattern emerge where the automatic trading algorithms started doing
their thing. Definitely too volatile.
Paul
emely hard to mold someone's thinking patterns by the time they're
adults. When we interview we try to spend more time trying to gauge
problem solving capabilities than anything else, after first quickly
establishing their technical level.
Paul
On 2/17/2012 8:43 AM, Kenneth M.
On 2/17/2012 10:55 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
Paul Graydon wrote:
Give me someone who can already think and analyse over someone who
'knows' it all, any day. You can be qualified to the hilt but
absolutely useless in the real world (I've watched CCNP and higher
struggling to
aaS et al
For what little it's probably worth mentioning, Amazon provides a shared
storage platform in the form of EBS, Elastic Block Storage, which you can
choose to use as your root device on your server if you so wish
(wouldn't advise you do, latency is unpredictable), or you can have it mounted
wherever is relevant for your data (the most common route). That's their
non-physical server dependent storage provision.
If you pay extra it'll replicate, or even replicate between availability zones.
You can also choose to have Amazon monitor and ensure sufficient numbers of
your server are running through autoscale.
Paul
...
Great, that's another filter to add to my mailserver.
Paul
On 3/4/2012 6:22 AM, Guru NANOG wrote:
Common Misconception: One additional bit of IPv4 Addressing will solve
world hunger
The Evil Bit (or spare unused bit) can be used to store (restore) one bit
The Left-Most bit of the 3
On 03/12/2012 10:05 AM, Maverick wrote:
Is there a whitelist that applications have to talk to in order to
update themselves?
Which applications? What updates?
f it's necessary to be talking about
blacklisting/whitelisting sites under such conditions as PCs in a prison
you're really better off just paying for something like a Websense to
take care of it.
Paul
?:[^()<>@,;:\\".\[\] \000-\031]+(?:(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])+|\Z|(?=[\["
()<>@,;:\\".\[\]]))|\[([^\[\]\r\\]|\\.)*\](?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])*)(?:\.(?:(?:\r\n)
?[ \t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\".\[\] \000-\031]+(?:(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])+|\Z|(?=[\["()<>
@,;:\\".\[\]]))|\[([^\[\]\r\\]|\\.)*\](?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])*))*(?:,@(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\".\[\] \000-\031]+(?:(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])+|\Z|(?=[\["()<>@,
;:\\".\[\]]))|\[([^\[\]\r\\]|\\.)*\](?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])*)(?:\.(?:(?:\r\n)?[ \t]
)*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\".\[\] \000-\031]+(?:(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])+|\Z|(?=[\["()<>@,;:\\
".\[\]]))|\[([^\[\]\r\\]|\\.)*\](?:(?:\r\n)?[ \t])*))*)*:(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])*)?
(?:[^()<>@,;:\\".\[\] \000-\031]+(?:(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])+|\Z|(?=[\["()<>@,;:\\".
\[\]]))|"(?:[^\"\r\\]|\\.|(?:(?:\r\n)?[ \t]))*"(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])*)(?:\.(?:(?:
\r\n)?[ \t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\".\[\] \000-\031]+(?:(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])+|\Z|(?=[\[
"()<>@,;:\\".\[\]]))|"(?:[^\"\r\\]|\\.|(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t]))*"(?:(?:\r\n)?[ \t])
*))*@(?:(?:\r\n)?[ \t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\".\[\]
\000-\031]+(?:(?:(?:\r\n)?[ \t])
+|\Z|(?=[\["()<>@,;:\\".\[\]]))|\[([^\[\]\r\\]|\\.)*\](?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])*)(?:\
.(?:(?:\r\n)?[ \t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\".\[\] \000-\031]+(?:(?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])+|\Z
|(?=[\["()<>@,;:\\".\[\]]))|\[([^\[\]\r\\]|\\.)*\](?:(?:\r\n)?[
\t])*))*\>(?:(
?:\r\n)?[ \t])*))*)?;\s*)
Paul
ork in a pinch.
Plain-text, no attachments, etc. Don't expect anything more than an
autoreply, but all complaints do get processed.
--
Paul
for their grey-listing/rate limiting report message. I've given up
trying to report anything e-mail related to Yahoo, mostly just apologise
to end users and suggest they use another e-mail provider.
Paul
On 03/21/2012 03:27 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Yahoo!'s abuse contact from w
considered below average."
To be fair to the initiative at least its goal is for universal access
to 1Gbps by 2018, something they term 'ultra-high-speed' (not sure where
that definition comes from): http://hawaii.gov/gov/broadband-policy-outline/
Paul
to "light blue touch paper and
retire to a safe distance" territory even mentioning them. There is a
good chance you might get a reply from Sorbs here, they almost always
seem to respond when things get raised on NANOG.
Paul
On 04/04/2012 09:53 AM, Chris Conn wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone fro
Stay away from the NYIIX. It goes down every month or two, and its
current management is not competent. There are plenty of competitive
options, including Equinix and Telx/TIE (which is free or close to
it).
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On 4/19/12, Abdelkader Chikh Daho wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
Based on conversations on this list a month or so ago, ISPs were
contacted with details of which of their IPs had compromised boxes
behind them, but it seems the consensus is that ISP were going to just
wait for users to phone support when it broke rather than be proactive
about it.
Paul
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/04/27/2039237/engineers-ponder-easier-fix-to-internet-problem
> "The problem: Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) enables routers to
> communicate about the best path to other networks, but routers don't
> verify the route 'announcements.' When routing problems erupt, '
We are using Solarwinds on our systems. it's one commercial system to
consider.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Vytautas V Grigaliunas [mailto:v...@fnal.gov]
Sent: May-01-12 4:31 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: IPv6 monitoring...
Greetings...
What are people using for
Cogent is really better suited as a tertiary provider.
Not a bad option, but you don't want to lose redundancy when they get
involved in their peering dispute or de-peering du jour.
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On 5/14/12, Michael J McCafferty wrote:
> Jason,
>
> I agree with John. You
I liked Cogent when we had them years ago but due to routing instability
(off the charts) and unplanned down time every single month we dropped
them. they call me every 3-6 months (different person each time) and I
tell them to go away
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Tim
have been using Bacula but it lacks bare metal options and
doesn't have any nice reporting options (Executive Dashboard etc)
Thanks for any input,
Paul
Nothing here for what it's worth....
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:j...@west.net]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:01 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Spam from inteliquent.com subject "nanog"
Anyone else just get this? Curious if they're sc
ext step will be to reach out to the carriers themselves, but I figured
many of their Network Engineers are probably on the NANOG mailing list and
this would be a great place to start.
Thanks in advance for your time and assistance.
Sincerely,
- Paul Porter
--
*Paul G. Porter
*GREE Inte
On 05/22/2012 01:21 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On May 22, 2012 4:00 PM, "Paul Porter" wrote:
Hi NANOG,
I'm looking for some information on the four largest US mobile phone
carriers and the current state of their IPv6 infrastructure. Specifically,
we are trying to figure out:
On 05/22/2012 01:40 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
On 05/22/2012 01:21 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On May 22, 2012 4:00 PM, "Paul Porter" wrote:
Hi NANOG,
I'm looking for some information on the four largest US mobile phone
carriers and the current state of their IPv6 infrastructure
<http://boingboing.net/2012/03/29/paul-vixies-firsthand-accoun.html>
He was there, and Put The Fix In, to down the network.
Certainly news to Phil Almquist and the entire BIND
development team
at UCB. Paul was at DECWRL and cut his teeth
greetings. i didn't notice this before, and i want to complete the record.
i'm paying more attention to the quoting this time, too.
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 04:33:28PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:40 AM, wrote:
> > > Paul will be t
s on about, i can't tell. the software is free, and isc cherishes our
relevance.
if you catch us doing wierd layer ten stuff that bugs you, give a shout.
maybe we don't really mean it.
> ... and i run and appreciate the software.
that's why we're here.
paul
nt of need. that's
nuts for a lot of reasons, one of which is its potentially and unmanageably
circular dependency on the acceptance of a route you don't know how to
accept or reject yet.
my take-away from this thread is: very few people take RPKI seriously, but
even fewer take ROVER seriously.
--
Paul Vixie
KI6YSY
(all caught up after this.)
Jay Ashworth writes:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "paul vixie"
>
>> On 5/28/2012 11:52 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> > ... maybe a bit too much layer ten for my taste. ...
>>
>> on that, we're trying to im
On 5/28/2012 9:42 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On May 28, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>> third, rsync's dependencies on routing (as in the RPKI+ROA case) are not
>> circular (which i think was david conrad's point but i'll drag it to here.)
> Nope. My poin
On 5/29/2012 10:27 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:01:59PM +,
> paul vixie wrote
> a message of 37 lines which said:
>
>> i can tell more than that. rover is a system that only works at all
>> when everything everywhere is working well,
On 28/05/12 22:19, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 5/28/12 6:31 AM, Evgeniy Aikashev wrote:
We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers
have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs.
Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range.
Do y
you fetched has only the risk of
staleness or invalidity, but never reachability.
as others have stated, there is no reference collection of bad ideas.
otherwise we would have written this one up in 1996 when a couple of dns
people looked at the routing system and said 'hey what about something
like [ROVER]?' and the routing people explained in detail why it
wouldn't work.
paul
is the effect of seeing one of those rrsets but not the
other? (here again we see the disadvantage of starting from incomplete
information.)
On 2012-05-30 4:24 AM, Shane Amante wrote:
> On May 29, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> the problem is in time domain bo
On 2012-05-30 12:53 AM, Nabil Sharma wrote:
> Paul:
>
> Where can we read details about the services ISC provided to the FBI,
> and how they were compensated?
it's in the AP News article published a few weeks ago. for an example:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/04/23/hundr
is you've also got to go into the realms of private clouds
(using, for example, openstack), on your own infrastructure in your own
datacenter. That's before you even start delving into PaaS, SaaS
"clouds" etc.
"Cloud" is a marketing term, not an engineering one.
Paul
On 06/07/2012 12:59 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:12:09 -1000, Paul Graydon said:
what cloud is you've also got to go into the realms of private clouds
(using, for example, openstack), on your own infrastructure in your own
datacenter.
Same definition. The
I'm not learning any records for Streampix (www.xfinitytv.com), only A's.
The domains this site redirects to are available over a v6 transport,
but not the actual streaming.
Anyone know what's going on?
Thanks,
Paul Wall
nconvenience might be having to log into each of whatever
sites it is you're concerned about and changing the password on them.
Paul
On 06/08/2012 10:02 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
From: Lyndon Nerenberg
On 2012-06-08, at 12:48 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
I'm sorry, my brain doesn't hold that many passwords. Unless you're
a savant, neither does yours. So what you're telling me and the rest
of the world
On 06/08/2012 10:22 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 06/08/2012 12:56 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
Use a password safe. Simple. Most of them even include secure
password generators. That way you only have one password to remember
stored in a location you have control over (and is encrypted), and
In my case I rely on Password Safe
(http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/), Password Gorilla
(https://github.com/zdia/gorilla/wiki/) and Dropbox.
PasswordSafe has android and windows clients. The windows client will
work under wine on linux if you really want, but it's a bit of a pain.
Passwor
On 06/08/2012 11:07 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 05:00:14PM -0400, Tyler Haske wrote:
KeePass, KeyPassDroid and Dropbox.
Yes, of course, I'll just upload all my passwords to a place totally
under the control of someone (well, actually, _two_ other ones) else,
and then pray
cting ipv6 spam based on source address.
for more information see:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110607_two_stage_filtering_for_ipv6_electronic_mail/
paul
so, we'll all need network operators to whitelist the parts of their
address spaces that they plan to send e-mail from, so that we can avoid
having to blackhole things one /64 at a time.
as before: for more information see:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110607_two_stage_filtering_for_ipv6_electronic_mail/
paul
, arguments from non-operators should and do carry less weight.)
--
Paul Vixie
KI6YSY
he 15 million open recursives would be good to see fixed.
at the moment most attacks are using authority servers, where it's far
easier to automatically tell attack flows from non-attack flows.
--
Paul Vixie
KI6YSY
but I believe that's Windows only.
RedHat have Satellite that patches and a whole lot more but that comes
at a premium. There is also SpaceWalk from them:
http://spacewalk.redhat.com/ that manages RedHat, CentOS and Scientific
Linux patching.
Paul
owners of SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM,
BEYONDWHOIS.COM, SHQIPHOST.COM, NASHHOST.NET and UNIMUNDI.COM playing
games.
Probably a stupid question, but what do they gain by doing such?
Paul
Comments?
Drive Slow
Paul
On 6/30/2012 3:16 PM, Paul WALL wrote:
Comments?
Drive Slow
Paul
Not very well if you have a modern box (RHES/CentOS 6) and Java apps
running on them. RHES/CentOS 5 merrily ignored it. Worse, just
bouncing the Java stack didn't fix it, it required the box to be
rebooted. A siz
d no
back-plane meant they were unable to reconfigure it to route around the
problem.
Paul
On 7/3/2012 1:53 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
UTC (and the system clock) should not move backwards, but, rather they repeat
second 59. UTC goes 58->59->00 most of the time, but during a leap second, it
should go 58->59->59->00). It's not so much going backwards as dropping a chime.
If they do that, t
That's unusual... we've gone through hard drive replacements many times and
always gotten a detailed email from them before the hard drive arrived
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Robert Glover [mailto:robe...@garlic.com]
Sent: July-13-12 2:32 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subje
> Wes Felter
> IBM Research - Austin
IRON looks interesting. I will look at that in more depth. We provide true
multi-homing across providers (usually what we find most people mean when they
say BGP) and v6 to the home via LISP. The traffic can be configured for load
sharing across li
ve provided addressing from your aggregate to your customer and they
have indicated that they are multi-homing, you need to preserve their
prefix-length in your outbound advertisements, or the redundant provider
carries the inbound traffic. Is this also frowned on? To me, this is the
multihoming tax we all pay for.
Paul
You need to raise your MTU above that on the other side and do a ping size
sweep. Unlike at Layer-3 when you can use set a DF bit and get back an ICMP
error, at Layer-2 when you exceed the far side's MTU, the packets are silently
dropped.
Paul Vinciguerra
CCIE# 10291
120 W Park A
ormous customer base is hungry for it.
--
Paul Bennett
ASR supports OTV if you can do multicast over L3. Although, you may not need
L2 extensions in the end.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Lavine [mailto:source_ro...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:23 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Layer2 over Layer3
To all,
I am trying to
e actually need from these temporary addresses.
Veering slightly off-topic for NANOG, but is this worth taking onto the
address policy mailing list ahead of RIPE65 to ensure people who aren't
in the WG session are aware of the issue - and can therefore support (or
question) any prop
Philip,
Here is the best reference I know of to address your issue.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/white_paper_c11_493718.html#wp9000281
From: Philip Lavine [mailto:source_ro...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 6:06 PM
To: David Swafford; Paul
that the addresses are not
unused. Not announced != Not used.
Paul.
>
> Ok, then let's take a step back, perhaps not permanently, and say DNS
> resolution is only really useful for routers with more than just a
> single default external route.
>
> So DNS could be reduced to an inter-router only protocol, similar to
> BGP in some sense.
LISP DDT uses a lookup
Curious whether it's commonplace to find systems that automatically regard .0
and .255 IP addresses (ipv4) as src/dst in packets as traffic that should be
considered invalid. When you have a pool of assignable addresses, you should
expect to see x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 in passing traffic (ie. VIP
ccess then invite them to scan
the LAN and see if said machines are picked up.
My experience of these things a year or two ago was that most of these
companies thought everyone had an internal flat IPv4 network in RFC1918
space and that was that. YMMV of course.
Paul.
--
Paul Thornton
right now, right?
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
funding him and AEI. Call it whatever
you want, I think "lobbyist" is the best word choice.
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:12 AM, mcfbbqroast . wrote:
> Wait, I'm confused?
>
> Of the ISPs can't handle 5mbps of traffic when a customer wants to watch
It is common courtesy around these parts to not libel your customers,
especially when they're paying you lots of money and making up 30% of
your incoming traffic. That you're posting in "hypotheticals" does
not mask your true messaging.
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On Tue, Jul
? This
question comes up about once a month, absent any good solutions, so
insight would be appreciated.
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:25 PM, McElearney, Kevin
wrote:
>
>
> On 7/29/14, 12:45 PM, "valdis.kletni...@vt.edu"
> wrote:
>
>>On
Appears to be loading just fine from here in Sg.
On Jul 31, 2014 11:21 PM, "Mike A" wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 02:38:13PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
> > We've been seeing some issues with getting to Ebay this morning, only a
> very select few of their GSLB sites in DNS seem to be responding
a case oppened in jtac
to try solve it
Sent from my iPhone
On 06/08/2014, at 07:15, Sebastian Wiesinger
wrote:
* Paul S. [2014-08-02 05:18]:
Hi folks,
We're considering the EX4300 to run routing (l3) for a few
hypervisors of ours that are connected via l2.
Primarily interested due to t
On 8/6/2014 午後 09:13, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 6 août 2014 20:54 +0900, "Paul S." :
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't OSPF require the AFL license
anyway to be 'legitly' ran?
OSPF does not need a feature license on those models (it is needed on
EX2200). AF
It would appear you've done your part in trying to reach out (and
subsequently failed), so the next step to go is dropping all traffic
from it.
Nothing wrong with trying to protect your own customer from people who
cannot be bothered to do their own due diligence.
On 8/11/2014 午前 12:19, Gabr
d Tony Li from several years ago which illustrated this, but
cannot find a reference at the moment
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Apologies for replying to my own post, but... below:
On 8/13/2014 7:05 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> On 8/13/2014 6:52 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> Am I overly cynical, or does this all work out perfectly for
>> some vendors? I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/13/2014 11:09 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 8/13/14 8:55 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>> Apologies for replying to my own post, but... below:
>>
>> On 8/13/2014 7:05 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
401 - 500 of 1420 matches
Mail list logo
