On 16/02/2012 07:45, Owen DeLong wrote: > > On Feb 15, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> On 2012.02.15 19:55, Nathan Eisenberg wrote: >>>> IPv6 is operational. >>> >>> How is this a misconception? It works fine for me... >> >> Imagine an operator who is v6 ignorant, with a home provider who implements >> v6 half-assed, and tries to access a v6 site that has perhaps v6-only >> accessible nameservers, when their provider who 'offers' v6 has resolvers >> that operate only over v4. >> >> *huge* misconception about the operational status of IPv6 (imho). >> >> Steve > > By that definition, IPv4 is non-operational. > > You can break anything if you try hard enough.
This being well demonstrated by most of the "Internet" access provided by hotels, for example. -- Paul
