Personally I thought it was funny
I don't think it was meant to come across as offensive
On 8/28/2015 11:45 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
Blake,
There's no call to be blatantly offensive like that.
-mel
On Aug 28, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
I'll just leave this here
https://hones
Hi all,
Is anyone else seeing high latency and huge packet loss at NTT's NYC
location?
Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. hosted-by.reliablesite.net 0.0%920.7 1.5 0.7 6.6 1.7
2. 108.61.244.105 0.0%910.2 0.2 0.2 0.4
I see it too, there are some 517 messages in my spam folder "New message"
Most of them get blocked, but a small fraction are still making it into
my inbox
On 10/25/2015 12:13 AM, anthony kasza wrote:
Has there been a recent uptick in crap sent to the list or is it just me?
Is there anything t
Hey,
Just blocking port 19 won't cut it, as we often see Chargen attacks that
run on nonstandard ports as well
Thanks,
Paras
On 11/4/2015 12:33 PM, Mario Eirea wrote:
Hello everyone,
Looking to find out how the pricing model works for DDoS mitigation and what to
expect as far as bal
Does anyone know or have any experience with Internap's route
optimization? Is it any good?
I've heard of competing solutions as well, such as the one provided by
Noction.
Thanks for your input,
Paras
t for more details.
>
> Thank you.
> --
> Piotr Iwanejko
--
Regards,
Paras
President
ProTraf Solutions, LLC
Enterprise DDoS Mitigation
vider for link with
> > commit
> > > 10ge and burst up to 100GE. It will be definitely cheaper and simpler
> > than
> > > your "magic" with IX cost reduction.
> > >
> > > On Thursday, 21 April 2016, Paras Jha > > wrote:
> > >
>
;ve never seen in RFP
> > > significant differences in comparable products.
> > >
> > > Fairer comparison would be QFX10k, instead of MX104. QFX10k is AFAIK
> > > only product in this segment which is not using Jericho. If this is
> > > competitive advantage or risk, jury is still out, I lean towards
> > > competitive advantage, mainly due to its memory design.
> > >
> > > --
> > > ++ytti
> > >
> >
>
--
Regards,
Paras
President
ProTraf Solutions, LLC
Enterprise DDoS Mitigation
ed as being in the correct
> location by Google. Can someone from their NOC reach out off-list?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
--
Regards,
Paras
President
ProTraf Solutions, LLC
Enterprise DDoS Mitigation
nts out a 404'd URL. It's an opportunity to
> fix something and to do better.
>
> ---rsk
>
--
Regards,
Paras
President
ProTraf Solutions, LLC
Enterprise DDoS Mitigation
Hi,
Try taking a look at Zoho, they offer what you're looking for for free.
Regards
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:11 PM, sam wrote:
> Hello if this is not appropriate for this list please excuse me and
> disregard this email. I thought of no better place than this place however
> if there is a be
t;<>> -t a www.vbooter.org
> >>> ;; global options: +cmd
> >>> ;; Got answer:
> >>> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 34920
> >>> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
> >>>
> >>> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> >>> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
> >>> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> >>> ;www.vbooter.org.INA
> >>>
> >>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> >>> www.vbooter.org.299INCNAMEvbooter.org.
> >>> vbooter.org.299INA104.28.13.7
> >>> vbooter.org.299INA104.28.12.7
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can anyone from cloudflare answer me why this fits with your business
> >> model?
> >>>
> >>> Mike-
> >>
> >>
>
>
--
Regards,
Paras
President
ProTraf Solutions, LLC
Enterprise DDoS Mitigation
, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Paras Jha
wrote:
> This is quite common, almost all of the DDoS-for-hire services are hosted
> behind CloudFlare, and a great majority of them take PayPal. Another one
> had even managed to secure an EV SSL cert.
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:24 P
tions where law
> enforcement has required that we *not* terminate service to certain
> websites. In those situations we are of course not allowed to discuss
> specifics.
>
>
> Justin Paine
> Head of Trust & Safety
> CloudFlare Inc.
> PGP: BBAA 6BCE 3305 7FD
ir network), and I'd argue it's Cloudflare's responsibility to help
stop abuse.
Just my 2C
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Paras Jha
wrote:
> Justin,
>
> The only problem with that statement is that it's not true: if you did
> terminate service to them, the w
ave
> many evidences!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jair Santanna
> jairsantanna.com
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Paras
President
ProTraf Solutions, LLC
Enterprise DDoS Mitigation
x27;s nice to
see that CF does maintain a presence here.
Regards
Paras
Hi Randy,
I've found the vast majority of large service providers to be very
receptive to abuse reports when they contain evidence and valid information.
Regards
Paras
He's right, conspiracy to commit X is a valid criminal charge, at least in
the US. Conspiracy to commit fraud, theft, murder, racketeering, etc are
all "sister charges" of charges of ones actually carried out.
I believe a class action lawsuit would sidestep this. Don't quote me on
that though, I may be wrong.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Paras Jha
wrote:
> He's right, conspiracy to commit X is a valid criminal charge, at least in
> the US. Conspiracy to commit fraud, theft, murder,
Nothing is going to happen. Cloudflare will continue to turn a blind eye
towards abusive customers, and even downright allow customers to HTTP scan
from their network without batting an eyelash. The mere act of scanning
isn't illegal, but it shows the kind of mindset that they have.
re well diversified
> with other more ethical carriers. Otherwise please consider another
> organization to work with.
> In our case we were better of with Ransomeware, than Zayo as a vendor! Its
> cheaper and less damaging
>
> A Zayo victim and a NANOG Member
>
--
Regards,
Paras
President
ProTraf Solutions, LLC
Enterprise DDoS Mitigation
Well don't forget, normal attacks launched from vDOS were around 8 -
16gbps.
On the Krebs article, he mentions "the company received an email directly
from vDOS claiming credit for the attack"
Now, if this holds true, it's likely that the operator of vDOS (Apple J4ck
was his moniker) was directin
Hello,
Can a rep for GTT contact me off-list? I tried twice using their website,
but nobody has gotten back to me for a few days now.
Thanks in advance!
Transit providers are the mdidlemen of the internet, I see no problem with
the concept of "double dipping". It's their fiber and infrastructure, if
you want access to everything on their network, including other people on
their network, pay for it or find a way to get access.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016
It's interesting that they'd call about DNS amplification... You don't
typically see DNS amplified floods coming from home ISPs. I would imagine
SSDP amplification is a far greater issue for any home ISP.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I know. It seems odd, doesn't it?
>
You got MITM'd
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Damien Burke
wrote:
> You should change your paypal password.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:27 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Southw
Does anyone know of any IP space brokers other than Hilco Streambank? I'm
looking to get a feel for the market a little bit.
Regards
Paras
Hi all,
I've been trying to get this issue resolved for the entire day now, but NTT
has been pretty unreceptive here.
We're announcing a large prefix for a client across our network, and we
discovered some insanely high latency.
After tracking down the issue, we determined it to be something wro
Page Not Found
Link wasn't copied correctly, the "consumer-privacy" bit was cut off.
Here's the working link:
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-proposed-rules-protect-broadband-consumer-privacy
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Livingood, Jason
30 matches
Mail list logo
